Jaguar Xf — reliability by registration year

2008–2021 · 14 registration years · 88,701 first tests

2016 breaks the run — 2.8 pp better than the years either side 2015 breaks the run — 2.5 pp worse than the years either side

Registration years

First-attempt MOT results for every Xf registration year with at least 500 first tests in 2025. Pass rates rise with newer cars, so read a year against its neighbours rather than against the top of the table. Years without their own report are listed here with the same figures.

Jaguar Xf first-attempt MOT results by registration year
Year First tests First-attempt pass Incl. PRS Most common failure
2021 673 89.6% 92.1%
2020 1,290 87.5% 89.2%
2019 3,163 86.3% 88.4% Tyres — Condition (front) 18.2%
2018 5,506 85.4% 88.0% Tyres — Condition (front) 17.6%
2017 6,591 85.5% 88.0% Tyres — Condition (front) 14.1%
2016 7,830 83.3% 86.2% Tyres — Condition (front) 14.1%
2.8 pp better than the years either side What failed 2016 Xfs most often: Tyres — Condition (front) (14.1%) · Tread depth (rear) (11.8%) · Brake pads (rear) (7.8%)
2015 9,229 75.5% 80.1% Tyres — Condition (front) 14.6%
2.5 pp worse than the years either side What failed 2015 Xfs most often: Tyres — Condition (front) (14.6%) · Registration plate lamp(s) (14.2%) · Brake pads (rear) (9.8%)
2014 11,369 72.5% 76.8% Tyres — Condition (front) 11.9%
2013 10,154 71.9% 75.3% Tyres — Condition (front) 11.6%
2012 8,895 70.0% 73.2% Tyres — Condition (rear) 9.9%
2011 7,192 67.8% 71.8% Tyres — Condition (rear) 11.1%
2010 7,738 64.9% 70.3% Position lamp (front) 15.2%
2009 5,297 62.8% 68.4% Position lamp (front) 16.3%
2008 3,774 63.9% 69.9% Position lamp (front) 21.2%

Other Jaguar models