At a glance
How 5,297 first tests went in 2025.
- Passed first time
- 63 in every 100
- Did not pass first time
- 37 in every 1001,971 failed first-attempt tests
- The typical car
- 16 yearsabout 111,719 miles
- First tests counted
- 5,297
What failed most often
- Individual sidelight or tail light (front)16 in every 100 failed tests
- Tyre condition (front)10 in every 100 failed tests
- Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (rear)8 in every 100 failed tests
How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.
These are patterns across 2009 Jaguar XF vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.
Suspension
Four faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (rear): 111 times as often as on similar cars.
Figures below are measured across the 1,968 of 1,971 failed first attempts (99.8%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.
We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.
Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (rear)
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (rear)
What it means
A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.
Suspension sub-frame (rear)
What it means
A suspension sub-frame insecurely attached to the chassis or axle is Major, and Dangerous when it is insecure and impairing directional stability. A sub-frame that is missing, likely to become detached, fractured or likely to fail is also Dangerous. Excessive damage or corrosion that seriously weakens it is Major.
Also noted as an advisory
Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 470 first tests, 3.6 times as often as on similar cars.
Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)
What it means
Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.
Also noted as an advisory
Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 227 first tests, 4.8 times as often as on similar cars.
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.
Lamps and electrical
One fault: rear fog light, 2.6 times as often as on similar cars.
Rear fog light
What it means
A missing obligatory rear fog lamp, one that is not working, or one that does not emit a steady red light is graded Major. A rear fog lamp adversely affected by the operation of any other lamp is Major too. The manual allows it to go out when main beam is switched on or when dipped beam headlamps are switched off.
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.
Brakes
One wear pattern: brake pads (rear), 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.
Brake pads (rear)
What it means
A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.
Also noted as an advisory
Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 159 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.
Tyres
One wear pattern: tyre tread depth (rear), 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.
Tyre tread depth (rear)
What it means
Only primary grooves count when tread depth is assessed: those holding the wear indicators, or cut as deep as those when new. Shallower secondary grooves are ignored. Tread depth below the minimum for the vehicle is Dangerous, and so is a pattern not visible over the whole tread, but that second row applies only to vehicles that need the lower minimum.
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.
Advisories
Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.
An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.
Suspension arm ball joint (rear)
Suspension sub-frame pins and bushes (rear)
Suspension sub-frame mounting area (rear)
Structural sub-frame condition (rear)
Flexible brake hoses (front)
Individual direction indicators (front)
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.
MOT pass rates
How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.
- Passed first time
- 63in every 100
- Passed on the first test.
- Fixed at the station
- 5in every 100
- Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
- Failed
- 32in every 100
- Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.
First-attempt pass 62.8% of 5,297 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 68.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 5 fixed and the 32 not fixed make the 37 in every 100 that did not pass first time.
Petrol and diesel
Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.
Same model, other years
Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.
Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.
| Year | Passed first time | First tests |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 64 in every 100 | 3,774 |
| 2009 This car | 63 in every 100 | 5,297 |
| 2010 | 65 in every 100 | 7,738 |
| 2011 | 68 in every 100 | 7,192 |
| 2012 | 70 in every 100 | 8,895 |
| 2013 | 72 in every 100 | 10,154 |
| 2014 | 73 in every 100 | 11,369 |
| 2015 | 75 in every 100 | 9,229 |
| 2016 | 83 in every 100 | 7,830 |
| 2017 | 86 in every 100 | 6,591 |
| 2018 | 85 in every 100 | 5,506 |
| 2019 | 86 in every 100 | 3,163 |
| 2020 | 88 in every 100 | 1,290 |
| 2021 | 90 in every 100 | 673 |
If you are buying one
What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.
Mileage matters most on a 2009 Jaguar XF.
Of 2009 Jaguar XF vehicles with under 82,000 miles, 72 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 143,000 miles or more, 55 in every 100 did.
Petrol or diesel?
| Typical mileage | Passed first time, as tested | Passed first time, same mileage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diesel | 113,178 miles | 62 | 62 |
| Petrol | 95,002 miles | 71 | 69 |
Figures are in every 100 first tests. Part of the gap is mileage: diesel cars have done more miles. Even at the same mileage, petrol passed more often (69 against 62 in every 100).
What to check at your mileage
How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.
| Under 82,000 | 103,000–121,000 | 143,000 and over | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual sidelight or tail light (front) | 1.3 | 6.2 | 10.9 |
| Tyre condition (front) | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.2 |
| Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (rear) | 3.3 | 3.4 | 2.6 |
| Windscreen washers | 1.7 | 3.1 | 3.8 |
| Brake pads (rear) | 1.1 | 3.4 | 3.0 |
Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.
When a car fails
of failed cars had one item to fix.
of failed cars had three or more items to fix.
of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).
Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.
FAQs
Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.
About this data
How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.
These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.
What we include
UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.
Same-day repairs
PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.
How we compare
We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.
What this does not cover
- MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
- Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
- Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
- If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check any vehicle’s MOT history
Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.
Run a free check