Jaguar XF 2019: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 86 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2019 Jaguar XF were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre condition (front).

Summary

The 2019 Jaguar XF follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 3,163 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
86 in every 100
Did not pass first time
14 in every 100434 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
6 yearsabout 45,777 miles
First tests counted
3,163

What failed most often

  1. Tyre condition (front)18 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Brake pads (rear)15 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre tread depth (rear)14 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2019 Jaguar XF vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre tread depth (rear), 4.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 434 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Tyre tread depth (rear)

Failed on 61 first tests4.0 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Only primary grooves count when tread depth is assessed: those holding the wear indicators, or cut as deep as those when new. Shallower secondary grooves are ignored. Tread depth below the minimum for the vehicle is Dangerous, and so is a pattern not visible over the whole tread, but that second row applies only to vehicles that need the lower minimum.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 88 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: petrol engine warning light, 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol engine warning light

Failed on 27 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) on a petrol engine is a Major failure when it is illuminated indicating a malfunction. The detail line DVSA gives for the same row also names an inoperative lamp. The test covers only certain petrol vehicles, depending on their age, size and fuel type.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One wear pattern: brake pads (rear), 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake pads (rear)

Failed on 67 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 66 first tests, 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
86in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
2in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
12in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 86.3% of 3,163 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 88.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 2 fixed and the 12 not fixed make the 14 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel1,69751,865 miles8586
Petrol1,46640,602 miles8887

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100201020152019Older carsNewer cars
40608010020102019Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200864 in every 1003,774
200963 in every 1005,297
201065 in every 1007,738
201168 in every 1007,192
201270 in every 1008,895
201372 in every 10010,154
201473 in every 10011,369
201575 in every 1009,229
201683 in every 1007,830
201786 in every 1006,591
201885 in every 1005,506
2019 This car86 in every 1003,163
202088 in every 1001,290
202190 in every 100673

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2019 Jaguar XF.

Of 2019 Jaguar XF vehicles with under 31,000 miles, 91 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 65,000 miles or more, 81 in every 100 did.

Under 31,000654 tests
91
31,000–41,000657 tests
87
41,000–52,000 Typical car628 tests
86
52,000–65,000586 tests
86
65,000 and over638 tests
81

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel51,865 miles8586
Petrol40,602 miles8887

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 51,865 against 40,602). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 31,00041,000–52,00065,000 and over
Tyre condition (front)1.52.24.2
Brake pads (rear)2.12.92.2
Tyre tread depth (rear)0.62.23.0

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

55in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

15in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

6in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2019 Jaguar XF follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Tyre condition (front), about 18 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 86.3% of 3,163 first MOTs on the 2019 Jaguar XF passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 88.4%. Among 434 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Petrol engine warning light appears more often than on similar cars (6.2% of those tests; 27 observed failures; about 2.3× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2019 Jaguar XF at the first attempt were Tyre condition (front) (18.2%), Brake pads (rear) (15.4%) and Tyre tread depth (rear) (14.1%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Petrol engine warning light (6.2% of those tests; 27 observed failures; about 2.3× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Petrol engine warning light shows up more often than on similar cars (6.2% of those tests; 27 observed failures; about 2.3× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2019 Jaguar XF include Petrol engine warning light. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2019 Jaguar XF (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check