At a glance
How 10,122 first tests went in 2025.
- Passed first time
- 76 in every 100
- Did not pass first time
- 24 in every 1002,420 failed first-attempt tests
- The typical car
- 9 yearsabout 54,500 miles
- First tests counted
- 10,122
What failed most often
- Individual sidelight or tail light (front)18 in every 100 failed tests
- Brake light10 in every 100 failed tests
- Tyre tread depth (front)8 in every 100 failed tests
How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.
These are patterns across 2016 Suzuki Swift vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.
Brakes
Two faults. The strongest is the rigid brake pipes (rear): 7.3 times as often as on similar cars.
Figures below are measured across the 2,420 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.
We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.
Rigid brake pipes (rear)
What it means
Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.
Also noted as an advisory
Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 188 first tests, 5.3 times as often as on similar cars.
Rigid brake pipes (front)
What it means
Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.
Also noted as an advisory
Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 178 first tests, 5.7 times as often as on similar cars.
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.
Lamps and electrical
Three faults. The strongest is the individual direction indicators (rear): 6.7 times as often as on similar cars.
Individual direction indicators (rear)
What it means
Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.
Also noted as an advisory
Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 124 first tests, 12 times as often as on similar cars.
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)
What it means
A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.
Brake light (rear)
What it means
All stop lamps missing or not working is graded Dangerous, and so is a stop lamp that stays on when the brakes are released. A stop lamp that is missing or not working is Major. On some vehicles with LED rear lamps, part of the stop lamp can go out when the rear fog lamp is lit, which is not regarded as a defect.
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.
Suspension
One fault: anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front), 2.6 times as often as on similar cars.
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)
What it means
A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.
Visibility
One fault: windscreen wipers, 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.
Windscreen wipers
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.
Advisories
Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.
An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.
Brake pedal
Flexible brake hoses (rear)
Suspension arm (front)
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.
MOT pass rates
How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.
- Passed first time
- 76in every 100
- Passed on the first test.
- Fixed at the station
- 9in every 100
- Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
- Failed
- 15in every 100
- Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.
First-attempt pass 76.1% of 10,122 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 84.6%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 9 fixed and the 15 not fixed make the 24 in every 100 that did not pass first time.
Same model, other years
Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.
Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 79 in every 100 passed first time.
| Year | Passed first time | First tests |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 48 in every 100 | 1,031 |
| 2006 | 50 in every 100 | 3,181 |
| 2007 | 50 in every 100 | 5,719 |
| 2008 | 51 in every 100 | 6,147 |
| 2009 | 53 in every 100 | 6,027 |
| 2010 | 56 in every 100 | 5,486 |
| 2011 | 61 in every 100 | 5,872 |
| 2012 | 64 in every 100 | 8,590 |
| 2013 | 68 in every 100 | 8,442 |
| 2014 | 71 in every 100 | 9,785 |
| 2015 | 74 in every 100 | 12,007 |
| 2016 This car | 76 in every 100 | 10,122 |
| 2017 | 80 in every 100 | 7,827 |
| 2018 | 84 in every 100 | 9,830 |
| 2019 | 87 in every 100 | 10,601 |
| 2020 | 88 in every 100 | 7,762 |
| 2021 | 89 in every 100 | 7,291 |
| 2022 | 93 in every 100 | 4,340 |
If you are buying one
What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.
Mileage matters most on a 2016 Swift.
Of 2016 Swift vehicles with under 35,000 miles, 87 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 76,000 miles or more, 64 in every 100 did.
What to check at your mileage
How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.
| Under 35,000 | 48,000–61,000 | 76,000 and over | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual sidelight or tail light (front) | 0.5 | 3.8 | 10.0 |
| Brake light | 0.4 | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| Tyre tread depth (front) | 0.4 | 1.5 | 3.8 |
| Windscreen wipers | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Windscreen washers | 0.8 | 1.3 | 2.4 |
Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.
When a car fails
of failed cars had one item to fix.
of failed cars had three or more items to fix.
of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).
Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.
FAQs
Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.
About this data
How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.
These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.
What we include
UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.
Same-day repairs
PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.
How we compare
We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.
What this does not cover
- MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
- Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
- Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
- If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check any vehicle’s MOT history
Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.
Run a free check