Suzuki Swift 2015: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 74 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2015 Suzuki Swift were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

The 2015 Suzuki Swift follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 12,007 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
74 in every 100
Did not pass first time
26 in every 1003,106 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
10 yearsabout 60,092 miles
First tests counted
12,007

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)19 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Brake light11 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Windscreen wipers (front)7 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2015 Suzuki Swift vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Two faults. The strongest is the rigid brake pipes (rear): 9.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 3,105 of 3,106 failed first attempts that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Failed on 192 first tests9.6 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 294 first tests, 5.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Failed on 128 first tests8.7 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 265 first tests, 5.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

Three faults. The strongest is the individual direction indicators (rear): 5.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Failed on 111 first tests5.9 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 134 first tests, 7.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual sidelight or tail light (front)

Failed on 590 first tests4.9 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Brake light (rear)

Failed on 342 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

All stop lamps missing or not working is graded Dangerous, and so is a stop lamp that stays on when the brakes are released. A stop lamp that is missing or not working is Major. On some vehicles with LED rear lamps, part of the stop lamp can go out when the rear fog lamp is lit, which is not regarded as a defect.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Visibility

One fault: windscreen wipers (front), 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Windscreen wipers (front)

Failed on 209 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Only a clearly damaged or worn windscreen wiper needs to be rejected. A wiper that is missing or not working is graded Major, and so is a blade that is missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen. A defective blade is graded Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Flexible brake hoses (rear)

Noted on 103 first tests6.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake pedal

Noted on 42 first tests5.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm (front)

Noted on 54 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake performance (plate test, rear)

Noted on 30 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Transmission oil leaks

Noted on 34 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
74in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
10in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
16in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 74.1% of 12,007 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 83.5%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 10 fixed and the 16 not fixed make the 26 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020152020Older carsNewer cars
406080100201020152020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 76 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200548 in every 1001,031
200650 in every 1003,181
200750 in every 1005,719
200851 in every 1006,147
200953 in every 1006,027
201056 in every 1005,486
201161 in every 1005,872
201264 in every 1008,590
201368 in every 1008,442
201471 in every 1009,785
2015 This car74 in every 10012,007
201676 in every 10010,122
201780 in every 1007,827
201884 in every 1009,830
201987 in every 10010,601
202088 in every 1007,762
202189 in every 1007,291
202293 in every 1004,340

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2015 Swift.

Of 2015 Swift vehicles with under 40,000 miles, 85 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 84,000 miles or more, 64 in every 100 did.

Under 40,0002,415 tests
85
40,000–54,0002,430 tests
78
54,000–67,000 Typical car2,363 tests
75
67,000–84,0002,355 tests
70
84,000 and over2,441 tests
64

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 40,00054,000–67,00084,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)0.44.611.1
Brake light1.03.24.0
Windscreen wipers (front)1.81.51.6
Rigid brake pipes (rear)0.91.42.0
Tyre tread depth (front)0.51.53.0

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

36in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

35in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

5in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2015 Suzuki Swift follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Individual sidelight or tail light (front), about 19 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 74.1% of 12,007 first MOTs on the 2015 Suzuki Swift passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 83.5%. Among 3,106 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Rigid brake pipes (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (6.2% of those tests; 192 observed failures; about 9.6× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2015 Suzuki Swift at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (19.0%), Brake light (11.0%) and Windscreen wipers (front) (6.7%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Rigid brake pipes (rear) (6.2% of those tests; 192 observed failures; about 9.6× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Rigid brake pipes (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (6.2% of those tests; 192 observed failures; about 9.6× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2015 Suzuki Swift include Rigid brake pipes (rear), Individual direction indicators (rear), Individual sidelight or tail light (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2015 Suzuki Swift (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check