At a glance
How 6,147 first tests went in 2025.
- Passed first time
- 51 in every 100
- Did not pass first time
- 49 in every 1002,989 failed first-attempt tests
- The typical car
- 17 yearsabout 94,270 miles
- First tests counted
- 6,147
What failed most often
- Individual sidelight or tail light (front)18 in every 100 failed tests
- Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)15 in every 100 failed tests
- Suspension arm ball joint (front)15 in every 100 failed tests
How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.
These are patterns across 2008 Suzuki Swift vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.
Suspension
Five faults. The strongest is the macpherson strut pins and bushes (front): 8.6 times as often as on similar cars.
Figures below are measured across the 2,987 of 2,989 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.
We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.
Macpherson strut pins and bushes (front)
What it means
A suspension pin or bush that is excessively worn is graded Major. One likely to become detached is graded Dangerous. DVSA uses its general suspension pin, bush or joint wording here, not anything specific to a strut.
Also noted as an advisory
Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 182 first tests, 6.4 times as often as on similar cars.
Macpherson strut (front)
What it means
Many MacPherson strut top bushes are designed to have significant lateral play when the suspension hangs free, so a top bush is rejected only when the play comes from wear or maladjustment. A top bush or bearing with excessive wear or free play is Major. Rubber or synthetic bushes are rejected only for serious deterioration of the bonding or flexible material.
Also noted as an advisory
Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 58 first tests, 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.
Suspension sub-frame (front)
What it means
A suspension sub-frame insecurely attached to the chassis or axle is Major, and Dangerous when it is insecure and impairing directional stability. A sub-frame that is missing, likely to become detached, fractured or likely to fail is also Dangerous. Excessive damage or corrosion that seriously weakens it is Major.
Suspension arm ball joint (front)
What it means
A suspension arm ball joint is failed under the general suspension pin, bush or joint wording. Excessively worn is Major, and likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.
Shock absorbers (rear)
What it means
Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.
Brakes
Five faults. The strongest is the brake hand lever: 3.9 times as often as on similar cars.
Brake hand lever
What it means
A brake lever is failed for insufficient reserve only if it is touching the floor or handlebar. On motorcycle derived systems the lever may touch the handlebar, so the extent of reserve travel is assessed during the brake test. A lever not releasing correctly is Minor, and Major where the functionality of the brakes is affected.
Handbrake lever
Brake imbalance across an axle (roller test, efficiency check, rear)
What it means
A wheel giving less than a set share of the maximum effort from the other wheel on the same axle is Major. On a steered axle, less than half is graded Dangerous. Testers disregard an imbalance if the lower effort is the result of a locked wheel, or if the higher effort from a wheel is at or below a low set figure.
Brake performance (roller test, rear)
Handbrake performance (roller test, rear)
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.
Advisories
Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.
An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.
Rigid brake pipes (front)
Rigid brake pipes (rear)
Coil spring (front)
Wheel bearings (rear)
Transmission oil leaks (front)
Anti-roll bar ball joint (front)
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.
MOT pass rates
How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.
- Passed first time
- 51in every 100
- Passed on the first test.
- Fixed at the station
- 8in every 100
- Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
- Failed
- 41in every 100
- Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.
First-attempt pass 51.4% of 6,147 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 59.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 41 not fixed make the 49 in every 100 that did not pass first time.
Same model, other years
Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.
Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 50 in every 100 passed first time.
| Year | Passed first time | First tests |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 48 in every 100 | 1,031 |
| 2006 | 50 in every 100 | 3,181 |
| 2007 | 50 in every 100 | 5,719 |
| 2008 This car | 51 in every 100 | 6,147 |
| 2009 | 53 in every 100 | 6,027 |
| 2010 | 56 in every 100 | 5,486 |
| 2011 | 61 in every 100 | 5,872 |
| 2012 | 64 in every 100 | 8,590 |
| 2013 | 68 in every 100 | 8,442 |
| 2014 | 71 in every 100 | 9,785 |
| 2015 | 74 in every 100 | 12,007 |
| 2016 | 76 in every 100 | 10,122 |
| 2017 | 80 in every 100 | 7,827 |
| 2018 | 84 in every 100 | 9,830 |
| 2019 | 87 in every 100 | 10,601 |
| 2020 | 88 in every 100 | 7,762 |
| 2021 | 89 in every 100 | 7,291 |
| 2022 | 93 in every 100 | 4,340 |
If you are buying one
What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.
Mileage matters most on a 2008 Swift.
Of 2008 Swift vehicles with under 67,000 miles, 61 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 120,000 miles or more, 47 in every 100 did.
What to check at your mileage
How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.
| Under 67,000 | 86,000–102,000 | 120,000 and over | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual sidelight or tail light (front) | 3.3 | 8.0 | 11.4 |
| Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) | 4.0 | 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Suspension arm ball joint (front) | 5.7 | 7.3 | 10.1 |
| Suspension arm pins and bushes (front) | 3.6 | 5.6 | 5.3 |
| Brake performance (roller test, rear) | 4.7 | 3.7 | 3.4 |
Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.
When a car fails
of failed cars had one item to fix.
of failed cars had three or more items to fix.
of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).
Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.
FAQs
Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.
About this data
How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.
These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.
What we include
UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.
Same-day repairs
PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.
How we compare
We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.
What this does not cover
- MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
- Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
- Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
- If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check any vehicle’s MOT history
Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.
Run a free check