SEAT Ibiza 2016: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 66 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2016 SEAT Ibiza were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Suspension arm pins and bushes (front).

Summary

The 2016 SEAT Ibiza follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 17,437 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
66 in every 100
Did not pass first time
34 in every 1005,888 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
9 yearsabout 64,606 miles
First tests counted
17,437

What failed most often

  1. Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)23 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Tyre tread depth (front)10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre condition (front)10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2016 SEAT Ibiza vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the suspension arm pins and bushes (front): 5.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 5,885 of 5,888 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)

Failed on 1,340 first tests5.9 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 832 first tests, 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Shock absorbers (front)

Failed on 333 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 955 first tests, 6.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 207 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

Two faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the handbrake lever: 4.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake lever

Failed on 171 first tests4.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism that is obviously worn is graded Minor. It is Major when worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release, and also when the ratchet is not holding correctly. A lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 28 first tests, 7.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 188 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Brake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 204 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: petrol emissions (with catalyst), 2.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 342 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Brake performance (plate test, rear)

Noted on 46 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Exhaust system

Noted on 150 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
66in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
5in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
29in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 66.2% of 17,437 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 71.1%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 5 fixed and the 29 not fixed make the 34 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol17,01864,216 miles6666
Diesel41981,951 miles6466

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020162020Older carsNewer cars
406080100201020162020Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 68 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200350 in every 100612
200449 in every 100848
200550 in every 1001,055
200649 in every 1001,968
200748 in every 1002,893
200848 in every 1004,240
200953 in every 1007,338
201055 in every 1009,010
201156 in every 10012,214
201259 in every 10012,236
201359 in every 10015,174
201461 in every 10018,296
201563 in every 10017,078
2016 This car66 in every 10017,437
201771 in every 10015,146
201872 in every 10012,375
201982 in every 10012,550
202086 in every 1007,811
202187 in every 1008,150
202288 in every 1005,012

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2016 Ibiza.

Of 2016 Ibiza vehicles with under 46,000 miles, 75 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 85,000 miles or more, 60 in every 100 did.

Under 46,0003,532 tests
75
46,000–59,0003,464 tests
69
59,000–71,000 Typical car3,607 tests
64
71,000–85,0003,393 tests
63
85,000 and over3,436 tests
60

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 46,00059,000–71,00085,000 and over
Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)7.18.27.7
Tyre tread depth (front)1.63.74.5
Tyre condition (front)2.13.23.9
Windscreen washers1.63.03.6
Coil spring (front)2.82.11.7

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

40in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

32in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

10in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2016 SEAT Ibiza follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Suspension arm pins and bushes (front), about 23 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 66.2% of 17,437 first MOTs on the 2016 SEAT Ibiza passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 71.1%. Among 5,888 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension arm pins and bushes (front) appears more often than on similar cars (22.8% of those tests; 1,340 observed failures; about 5.9× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2016 SEAT Ibiza at the first attempt were Suspension arm pins and bushes (front) (22.8%), Tyre tread depth (front) (10.3%) and Tyre condition (front) (9.5%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension arm pins and bushes (front) (22.8% of those tests; 1,340 observed failures; about 5.9× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension arm pins and bushes (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (22.8% of those tests; 1,340 observed failures; about 5.9× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2016 SEAT Ibiza include Suspension arm pins and bushes (front), Handbrake lever, Shock absorbers (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2016 SEAT Ibiza (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check