Mercedes-Benz E-Class 2019: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 85 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2019 Mercedes-Benz E-Class were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre condition (front).

Summary

At the same mileage, a 2019 Mercedes-Benz E-Class on another fuel passed first time more often than a petrol one: 89 in every 100 against 82 in every 100.

At a glance

How 18,126 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
85 in every 100
Did not pass first time
15 in every 1002,771 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
6 yearsabout 53,774 miles
First tests counted
18,126

What failed most often

  1. Tyre condition (front)29 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Suspension arm ball joint (front)16 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre tread depth (rear)11 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2019 Mercedes-Benz E-Class vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Road wheels

Two faults. The strongest is the wheel condition (rear): 30 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,770 of 2,771 failed first attempts that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Wheel condition (rear)

Failed on 178 first tests30 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A wheel with any fracture or welding defect is graded Dangerous. So is a tyre retaining ring likely to come off, or a wheel distorted or worn to the extent that the wheel or tyre is likely to become detached. A wheel that is badly distorted, or has an excessively worn spigot mounting, is graded Major.

Wheel condition (front)

Failed on 221 first tests28 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A wheel with any fracture or welding defect is graded Dangerous. So is a tyre retaining ring likely to come off, or a wheel distorted or worn to the extent that the wheel or tyre is likely to become detached. A wheel that is badly distorted, or has an excessively worn spigot mounting, is graded Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

One fault: suspension arm ball joint (front), 7.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm ball joint (front)

Failed on 444 first tests7.6 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A suspension arm ball joint is failed under the general suspension pin, bush or joint wording. Excessively worn is Major, and likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 286 first tests, 11 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Tyres

Two wear patterns. The strongest is the tyre tread depth (rear): 3.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre tread depth (rear)

Failed on 315 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Only primary grooves count when tread depth is assessed: those holding the wear indicators, or cut as deep as those when new. Shallower secondary grooves are ignored. Tread depth below the minimum for the vehicle is Dangerous, and so is a pattern not visible over the whole tread, but that second row applies only to vehicles that need the lower minimum.

Tyre condition (front)

Failed on 803 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Exposed or damaged ply or cords are graded Dangerous. A cut in excess of the requirements and deep enough to reach the ply or cords is Major, and testers may open the cut with a blunt instrument to check its depth. A tyre contacting the vehicle through flexing or suspension movement is not a defect; fouling fails only at the time of test.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Propeller shaft flexible couplings (rear)

Noted on 49 first tests25 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
85in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
1in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
14in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 84.7% of 18,126 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 86.3%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 1 fixed and the 14 not fixed make the 15 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

By fuel type

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel12,71958,118 miles8585
Petrol3,71740,546 miles8482
Hybrid89344,720 miles8484

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002005201020152019Older carsNewer cars
406080100200020102019Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199870 in every 100422
199971 in every 100369
200073 in every 100408
200165 in every 100554
200267 in every 100760
200368 in every 1002,313
200468 in every 1003,206
200566 in every 1003,241
200668 in every 1002,945
200771 in every 1004,547
200870 in every 1003,705
200970 in every 1005,810
201069 in every 1009,946
201169 in every 10011,790
201268 in every 10012,962
201371 in every 10016,872
201475 in every 10018,459
201577 in every 10019,522
201681 in every 10018,607
201783 in every 10019,815
201883 in every 10018,699
2019 This car85 in every 10018,126
202085 in every 1008,987
202187 in every 1005,439
202287 in every 1002,823

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage makes little difference on a 2019 E-Class.

Of 2019 E-Class vehicles with under 35,000 miles, 88 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 85,000 miles or more, 87 in every 100 did.

Under 35,0003,688 tests
88
35,000–47,0003,493 tests
85
47,000–61,000 Typical car3,693 tests
82
61,000–85,0003,615 tests
81
85,000 and over3,635 tests
87

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel58,118 miles8585
Petrol40,546 miles8482

Figures are in every 100 first tests. At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 35,00047,000–61,00085,000 and over
Tyre condition (front)4.65.42.6
Suspension arm ball joint (front)1.03.22.1
Tyre tread depth (rear)0.71.82.5
Wheel condition (front)1.31.80.6
Brake pads (rear)0.40.70.3

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

56in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

15in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

8in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

At the same mileage, a 2019 Mercedes-Benz E-Class on another fuel passed first time more often than a petrol one: 89 in every 100 against 82 in every 100. In 2025, 84.7% of 18,126 first MOTs on the 2019 Mercedes-Benz E-Class passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 86.3%. Among 2,771 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Wheel condition (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (6.4% of those tests; 178 observed failures; about 30× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2019 Mercedes-Benz E-Class at the first attempt were Tyre condition (front) (29.0%), Suspension arm ball joint (front) (16.0%) and Tyre tread depth (rear) (11.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Wheel condition (rear) (6.4% of those tests; 178 observed failures; about 30× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Wheel condition (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (6.4% of those tests; 178 observed failures; about 30× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2019 Mercedes-Benz E-Class include Wheel condition (rear), Suspension arm ball joint (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2019 Mercedes-Benz E-Class (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check