Mazda 6 2018: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 82 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2018 Mazda 6 were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Coil spring (rear).

Summary

The 2018 Mazda 6 follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 3,120 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
82 in every 100
Did not pass first time
18 in every 100556 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
7 yearsabout 59,378 miles
First tests counted
3,120

What failed most often

  1. Coil spring (rear)13 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Brake pads (rear)11 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2018 Mazda 6 vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

One fault: coil spring (rear), 4.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 556 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Coil spring (rear)

Failed on 75 first tests4.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One wear pattern: brake discs (rear), 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 20 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 102 first tests, 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Noted on 20 first tests4.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
82in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
3in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
15in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 82.2% of 3,120 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 84.7%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 3 fixed and the 15 not fixed make the 18 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol1,67850,795 miles8483
Diesel1,44272,760 miles8181

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020152018Older carsNewer cars
40608010020102018Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 84 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200550 in every 100529
200654 in every 100915
200752 in every 1001,676
200853 in every 1002,381
200958 in every 1002,875
201058 in every 1004,007
201159 in every 1003,220
201260 in every 1002,450
201366 in every 1003,591
201468 in every 1005,437
201571 in every 1005,966
201674 in every 1006,398
201777 in every 1004,463
2018 This car82 in every 1003,120
201987 in every 1004,244
202089 in every 1001,016
202190 in every 100642
202292 in every 100683

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage makes a modest difference on a 2018 Mazda 6.

Of 2018 Mazda 6 vehicles with under 40,000 miles, 87 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 86,000 miles or more, 80 in every 100 did.

Under 40,000623 tests
87
40,000–54,000648 tests
81
54,000–67,000 Typical car613 tests
85
67,000–86,000614 tests
79
86,000 and over621 tests
80

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol50,795 miles8483
Diesel72,760 miles8181

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 72,760 against 50,795). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 40,00054,000–67,00086,000 and over
Coil spring (rear)2.91.51.1
Brake pads (rear)1.12.42.1

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

60in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

15in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

6in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2018 Mazda 6 follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Coil spring (rear), about 13 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 82.2% of 3,120 first MOTs on the 2018 Mazda 6 passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 84.7%. Among 556 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Coil spring (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (13.5% of those tests; 75 observed failures; about 4.1× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2018 Mazda 6 at the first attempt were Coil spring (rear) (13.5%) and Brake pads (rear) (10.6%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Coil spring (rear) (13.5% of those tests; 75 observed failures; about 4.1× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Coil spring (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (13.5% of those tests; 75 observed failures; about 4.1× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2018 Mazda 6 include Coil spring (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2018 Mazda 6 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check