Hyundai ix20 2016: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 77 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2016 Hyundai ix20 were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test).

Summary

The 2016 Hyundai ix20 follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 3,566 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
77 in every 100
Did not pass first time
23 in every 100824 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
9 yearsabout 44,848 miles
First tests counted
3,566

What failed most often

  1. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)17 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)9 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Brake light8 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2016 Hyundai ix20 vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Two faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the handbrake performance (roller test, rear): 9.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 824 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Handbrake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 42 first tests9.9 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake that is inoperative on one side is Major. When tested on the road, the failure is the vehicle deviating excessively from a straight line. Vehicles whose parking brake was already tested as the secondary brake are not tested again for this.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 142 first tests7.2 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.

Brake pads (rear)

Failed on 65 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the individual sidelight or tail light (front): 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual sidelight or tail light (front)

Failed on 71 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Brake light (rear)

Failed on 68 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

All stop lamps missing or not working is graded Dangerous, and so is a stop lamp that stays on when the brakes are released. A stop lamp that is missing or not working is Major. On some vehicles with LED rear lamps, part of the stop lamp can go out when the rear fog lamp is lit, which is not regarded as a defect.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail.

Brake performance (roller test, rear)

Noted on 27 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Number plates (rear)

Noted on 25 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
77in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
6in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
17in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 76.9% of 3,566 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 83.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 6 fixed and the 17 not fixed make the 23 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as tested
Petrol3,14443,055 miles78
Diesel42259,925 miles69

Figures are in every 100 first tests.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020102016Older carsNewer cars
40608010020102016Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 80 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
201051 in every 100306
201154 in every 1003,295
201255 in every 1003,349
201356 in every 1003,233
201463 in every 1003,344
201572 in every 1003,184
2016 This car77 in every 1003,566
201783 in every 1003,826
201888 in every 1002,119
201989 in every 1001,478

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2016 Hyundai ix20.

Of 2016 Hyundai ix20 vehicles with under 29,000 miles, 87 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 66,000 miles or more, 65 in every 100 did.

Under 29,000739 tests
87
29,000–39,000649 tests
83
39,000–51,000 Typical car745 tests
76
51,000–66,000740 tests
74
66,000 and over693 tests
65

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 29,00039,000–51,00066,000 and over
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)2.25.15.9
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)0.31.65.3
Brake light0.12.02.9
Headlight aim1.41.64.0
Brake pads (rear)0.82.43.2

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

48in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

25in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

6in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2016 Hyundai ix20 follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test), about 17 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 76.9% of 3,566 first MOTs on the 2016 Hyundai ix20 passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 83.2%. Among 824 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) appears more often than on similar cars (17.2% of those tests; 142 observed failures; about 7.2× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2016 Hyundai ix20 at the first attempt were Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (17.2%), Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (8.6%) and Brake light (8.3%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (17.2% of those tests; 142 observed failures; about 7.2× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) shows up more often than on similar cars (17.2% of those tests; 142 observed failures; about 7.2× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2016 Hyundai ix20 include Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test), Handbrake performance (roller test, rear), Individual sidelight or tail light (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2016 Hyundai ix20 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check