Hyundai i10 2015: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 76 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2015 Hyundai i10 were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Windscreen washers.

Summary

The 2015 Hyundai i10 follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 21,555 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
76 in every 100
Did not pass first time
24 in every 1005,149 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
10 yearsabout 48,036 miles
First tests counted
21,555

What failed most often

  1. Windscreen washers9 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Brake light9 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2015 Hyundai i10 vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Four faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the brake discs (rear): 5.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 5,148 of 5,149 failed first attempts that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 341 first tests5.5 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 1,013 first tests, 3.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-lock braking system (ABS)

Failed on 221 first tests3.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

ABS is failed as removed only where it has obviously been removed, because not every vehicle in the age range where removal is not permitted has ABS. A warning lamp that does not light or shows an ABS fault is Major, as is a missing or excessively damaged wheel speed sensor. Every failure row for this component is Major.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 439 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.

Brake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 263 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 226 first tests, 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Electronic stability control

Failed on 118 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

An ESC warning lamp is failed only when the tester is certain it indicates an ESC malfunction, because the lamp takes various forms and the owner's handbook may need checking. The system is also called ESP, VDC or DSC, among many other names. Every failure row is Major, covering the lamp, wheel speed sensors, wiring, other components and the switch.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: brake light (rear), 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake light (rear)

Failed on 466 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

All stop lamps missing or not working is graded Dangerous, and so is a stop lamp that stays on when the brakes are released. A stop lamp that is missing or not working is Major. On some vehicles with LED rear lamps, part of the stop lamp can go out when the rear fog lamp is lit, which is not regarded as a defect.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Visibility

One fault: windscreen washers (front), 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Windscreen washers (front)

Failed on 294 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Windscreen washers that are not working, or do not provide sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen, are graded Major. They must provide enough fluid for the wipers to clear the windscreen effectively. Vehicles with an opening windscreen, or some other adequate view to the front, left and right, are not inspected for washers.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Seat belt condition (rear)

Noted on 67 first tests4.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Side repeater indicators

Noted on 25 first tests4.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Headlight (front)

Noted on 24 first tests3.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake pedal

Noted on 36 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake performance (plate test, rear)

Noted on 43 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
76in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
6in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
18in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 76.1% of 21,555 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 82.1%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 6 fixed and the 18 not fixed make the 24 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100201020152020Older carsNewer cars
406080100201020152020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 77 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200855 in every 1004,181
200958 in every 10017,479
201062 in every 10017,362
201163 in every 10016,019
201262 in every 10019,089
201363 in every 10019,598
201471 in every 10022,080
2015 This car76 in every 10021,555
201680 in every 10021,548
201781 in every 10023,091
201880 in every 10020,594
201982 in every 10017,682
202087 in every 1006,192
202185 in every 1007,840
202284 in every 1008,288

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2015 Hyundai i10.

Of 2015 Hyundai i10 vehicles with under 29,000 miles, 84 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 71,000 miles or more, 66 in every 100 did.

Under 29,0004,367 tests
84
29,000–42,0004,420 tests
81
42,000–55,000 Typical car4,278 tests
77
55,000–71,0004,197 tests
72
71,000 and over4,290 tests
66

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 29,00042,000–55,00071,000 and over
Windscreen washers1.52.13.1
Brake light0.82.13.2
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)0.91.63.9
Tyre pressure monitoring system1.41.92.2
Tyre tread depth (front)0.52.03.0

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

45in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

26in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

6in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2015 Hyundai i10 follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Windscreen washers, about 9 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 76.1% of 21,555 first MOTs on the 2015 Hyundai i10 passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 82.1%. Among 5,149 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Anti-lock braking system (ABS) appears more often than on similar cars (4.3% of those tests; 221 observed failures; about 3.8× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2015 Hyundai i10 at the first attempt were Windscreen washers (9.3%), Brake light (9.1%) and Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (8.5%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Anti-lock braking system (ABS) (4.3% of those tests; 221 observed failures; about 3.8× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Anti-lock braking system (ABS) shows up more often than on similar cars (4.3% of those tests; 221 observed failures; about 3.8× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2015 Hyundai i10 include Anti-lock braking system (ABS), Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test), Brake light (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2015 Hyundai i10 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check