Hyundai i10 2013: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 63 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2013 Hyundai i10 were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

A 2013 Hyundai i10 passed first time about 4 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2012 and 2014 model years.

At a glance

How 19,598 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
63 in every 100
Did not pass first time
37 in every 1007,252 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
12 yearsabout 52,916 miles
First tests counted
19,598

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)23 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front)11 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Brake light10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2013 Hyundai i10 vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

One fault: suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front), 6.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 7,250 of 7,252 failed first attempts that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 810 first tests6.9 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Whether a suspension arm ball joint dust cover still keeps dirt out decides its grade. Severely deteriorated is Minor, while missing, or no longer preventing the ingress of dirt, is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

Three faults. The strongest is the anti-lock braking system (ABS): 5.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-lock braking system (ABS)

Failed on 365 first tests5.6 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

ABS is failed as removed only where it has obviously been removed, because not every vehicle in the age range where removal is not permitted has ABS. A warning lamp that does not light or shows an ABS fault is Major, as is a missing or excessively damaged wheel speed sensor. Every failure row for this component is Major.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Failed on 392 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 1,089 first tests, 4.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Failed on 158 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 509 first tests, 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

Three faults. The strongest is the individual sidelight or tail light (front): 3.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual sidelight or tail light (front)

Failed on 1,642 first tests3.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Number plate lights (rear)

Failed on 422 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Registration plate lamps must light up the rear registration plate and operate at the same time as the position lamps. A missing or inoperative lamp is Major when the plate has only one lamp or all its lamps are not working, and Minor when the plate has several lamps or light sources and not all have failed. A lamp throwing direct white light to the rear is also Minor.

Brake light

Failed on 722 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

All stop lamps missing or not working is graded Dangerous, and so is a stop lamp that stays on when the brakes are released. A stop lamp that is missing or not working is Major. On some vehicles with LED rear lamps, part of the stop lamp can go out when the rear fog lamp is lit, which is not regarded as a defect.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 131 first tests, 5.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: petrol engine warning light, 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol engine warning light

Failed on 425 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) on a petrol engine is a Major failure when it is illuminated indicating a malfunction. The detail line DVSA gives for the same row also names an inoperative lamp. The test covers only certain petrol vehicles, depending on their age, size and fuel type.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Side repeater indicators (front)

Noted on 89 first tests9.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake pedal

Noted on 64 first tests4.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension spring mounting area (rear)

Noted on 27 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Wheel bearings (rear)

Noted on 69 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm (front)

Noted on 334 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
63in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
9in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
28in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 63.0% of 19,598 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 72.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 9 fixed and the 28 not fixed make the 37 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100201020132020Older carsNewer cars
406080100201020132020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 64 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200855 in every 1004,181
200958 in every 10017,479
201062 in every 10017,362
201163 in every 10016,019
201262 in every 10019,089
2013 This car63 in every 10019,598
201471 in every 10022,080
201576 in every 10021,555
201680 in every 10021,548
201781 in every 10023,091
201880 in every 10020,594
201982 in every 10017,682
202087 in every 1006,192
202185 in every 1007,840
202284 in every 1008,288

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2013 Hyundai i10.

Of 2013 Hyundai i10 vehicles with under 33,000 miles, 77 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 77,000 miles or more, 53 in every 100 did.

Under 33,0004,005 tests
77
33,000–46,0003,737 tests
67
46,000–60,000 Typical car4,062 tests
61
60,000–77,0003,797 tests
58
77,000 and over3,995 tests
53

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 33,00046,000–60,00077,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)2.99.912.2
Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front)2.85.13.6
Brake light1.34.34.6
Suspension arm ball joint (front)0.53.07.3
Tyre condition (front)2.02.84.1

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

33in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

38in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

7in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2013 Hyundai i10 passed first time about 4 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2012 and 2014 model years. In 2025, 63.0% of 19,598 first MOTs on the 2013 Hyundai i10 passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 72.2%. Among 7,252 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front) appears more often than on similar cars (11.2% of those tests; 810 observed failures; about 6.9× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2013 Hyundai i10 at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (22.6%), Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front) (11.2%) and Brake light (10.0%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front) (11.2% of those tests; 810 observed failures; about 6.9× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (11.2% of those tests; 810 observed failures; about 6.9× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2013 Hyundai i10 include Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front), Anti-lock braking system (ABS), Rigid brake pipes (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2013 Hyundai i10 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check