Honda Civic 2013: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 71 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2013 Honda Civic were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

The 2013 Honda Civic follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 14,653 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
71 in every 100
Did not pass first time
29 in every 1004,192 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
12 yearsabout 92,912 miles
First tests counted
14,653

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)24 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Headlight aim9 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Brake pads (rear)8 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2013 Honda Civic vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre pressure monitoring system, 8.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 4,175 of 4,192 failed first attempts (99.6%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Tyre pressure monitoring system

Failed on 200 first tests8.5 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A tyre pressure monitoring system that is obviously inoperative is graded Major, and so is one listed as malfunctioning or obviously inoperative. The Minor row uses the word malfunctioning too, but its detail is a warning lamp indicating a fault, and it also covers a tyre that is obviously under-inflated.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

Two faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the anti-lock braking system (ABS): 4.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-lock braking system (ABS)

Failed on 224 first tests4.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

ABS is failed as removed only where it has obviously been removed, because not every vehicle in the age range where removal is not permitted has ABS. A warning lamp that does not light or shows an ABS fault is Major, as is a missing or excessively damaged wheel speed sensor. Every failure row for this component is Major.

Electronic stability control

Failed on 139 first tests4.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

An ESC warning lamp is failed only when the tester is certain it indicates an ESC malfunction, because the lamp takes various forms and the owner's handbook may need checking. The system is also called ESP, VDC or DSC, among many other names. Every failure row is Major, covering the lamp, wheel speed sensors, wiring, other components and the switch.

Brake pads (rear)

Failed on 328 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: individual sidelight or tail light (front), 2.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual sidelight or tail light (front)

Failed on 985 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: airbag warning light, 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Airbag warning light

Failed on 147 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The airbag warning lamp (SRS MIL in DVSA's wording) is failed only if it indicates a system malfunction, which is Major. A lamp lit to show the passenger airbag is disabled is not to be regarded as a defect. Dashboard messages are not a defect in their own right, though they can help the tester confirm a malfunction.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail.

Suspension arm (front)

Noted on 161 first tests4.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension mounting area (rear)

Noted on 50 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Flexible brake hoses (rear)

Noted on 69 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
71in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
9in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
20in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 71.4% of 14,653 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 79.8%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 9 fixed and the 20 not fixed make the 29 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol7,60177,684 miles7369
Diesel7,050111,017 miles7073

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100199520002005201020132020Older carsNewer cars
4060801002000201020132020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 73 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199578 in every 100325
199663 in every 100482
199759 in every 100755
199861 in every 100857
199962 in every 1001,141
200064 in every 1001,362
200155 in every 1003,589
200254 in every 1005,292
200353 in every 1006,068
200456 in every 1008,557
200556 in every 10010,433
200653 in every 10011,109
200753 in every 10018,127
200853 in every 10017,412
200954 in every 10016,721
201054 in every 10015,256
201157 in every 10010,444
201269 in every 10012,469
2013 This car71 in every 10014,653
201476 in every 10013,892
201579 in every 10014,533
201681 in every 10015,631
201783 in every 10013,989
201885 in every 10012,976
201986 in every 10012,034
202087 in every 1005,301
202188 in every 1004,738
202294 in every 1001,381

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2013 Civic.

Of 2013 Civic vehicles with under 64,000 miles, 83 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 126,000 miles or more, 63 in every 100 did.

Under 64,0002,975 tests
83
64,000–84,0002,884 tests
76
84,000–102,000 Typical car2,916 tests
70
102,000–126,0002,906 tests
65
126,000 and over2,943 tests
63

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol77,684 miles7369
Diesel111,017 miles7073

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 111,017 against 77,684). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 64,00084,000–102,000126,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)1.57.610.7
Headlight aim0.92.63.5
Brake pads (rear)1.42.43.0
Tyre condition (front)1.72.12.3
Tyre tread depth (front)0.51.82.6

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

39in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

33in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

7in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2013 Honda Civic follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Individual sidelight or tail light (front), about 24 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 71.4% of 14,653 first MOTs on the 2013 Honda Civic passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 79.8%. Among 4,192 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Anti-lock braking system (ABS) appears more often than on similar cars (5.4% of those tests; 224 observed failures; about 4.3× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2013 Honda Civic at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (23.6%), Headlight aim (8.5%) and Brake pads (rear) (7.9%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Anti-lock braking system (ABS) (5.4% of those tests; 224 observed failures; about 4.3× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Anti-lock braking system (ABS) shows up more often than on similar cars (5.4% of those tests; 224 observed failures; about 4.3× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2013 Honda Civic include Anti-lock braking system (ABS), Electronic stability control, Individual sidelight or tail light (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2013 Honda Civic (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check