Honda Civic 2006: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 53 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2006 Honda Civic were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

A 2006 Honda Civic passed first time about 2 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2005 and 2007 model years.

At a glance

How 11,109 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
53 in every 100
Did not pass first time
47 in every 1005,239 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
19 yearsabout 123,479 miles
First tests counted
11,109

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)18 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Headlight aim12 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Headlight9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2006 Honda Civic vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the shock absorbers (front): 3.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 5,209 of 5,239 failed first attempts (99.4%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Shock absorbers (front)

Failed on 421 first tests3.9 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Anti-roll bar ball joint (front)

Failed on 115 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

On an anti-roll bar ball joint, DVSA fails a suspension pin, bush or joint that is excessively worn as Major. One likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 63 first tests, 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front)

Failed on 344 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Excessive wear on an anti-roll bar linkage ball joint is Major. A joint likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: side repeater indicators, 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Side repeater indicators

Failed on 240 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Sequential or dynamic direction indicators are not a reason to fail. Where a side repeater is required, it is allowed to be part of the front direction indicator if it has a marked wraparound lens, or an amber light coming through the front lens when viewed from a set distance to the side of the rear bumper. A lens defect with no effect on the emitted light is Minor, and one that adversely affects the light is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One wear pattern: brake discs (rear), 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 160 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Handbrake lever

Noted on 26 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Swivel pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 163 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Coil spring (rear)

Noted on 922 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Other suspension component (rear)

Noted on 102 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Steering rack play

Noted on 39 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Number plates (rear)

Noted on 432 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
53in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
10in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
37in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 52.8% of 11,109 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 62.6%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 10 fixed and the 37 not fixed make the 47 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol8,946118,841 miles5353
Diesel2,023147,785 miles5054

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100199520002006201020152020Older carsNewer cars
4060801002000200620102020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199578 in every 100325
199663 in every 100482
199759 in every 100755
199861 in every 100857
199962 in every 1001,141
200064 in every 1001,362
200155 in every 1003,589
200254 in every 1005,292
200353 in every 1006,068
200456 in every 1008,557
200556 in every 10010,433
2006 This car53 in every 10011,109
200753 in every 10018,127
200853 in every 10017,412
200954 in every 10016,721
201054 in every 10015,256
201157 in every 10010,444
201269 in every 10012,469
201371 in every 10014,653
201476 in every 10013,892
201579 in every 10014,533
201681 in every 10015,631
201783 in every 10013,989
201885 in every 10012,976
201986 in every 10012,034
202087 in every 1005,301
202188 in every 1004,738
202294 in every 1001,381

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2006 Civic.

Of 2006 Civic vehicles with under 91,000 miles, 63 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 156,000 miles or more, 47 in every 100 did.

Under 91,0002,177 tests
63
91,000–113,0002,182 tests
54
113,000–133,000 Typical car2,236 tests
50
133,000–156,0002,235 tests
51
156,000 and over2,229 tests
47

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol118,841 miles5353
Diesel147,785 miles5054

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 147,785 against 118,841). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 91,000113,000–133,000156,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)3.910.110.5
Headlight aim3.66.17.0
Headlight2.44.85.0
Suspension mounting area (rear)2.74.64.8
Shock absorbers (front)4.34.33.0

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

21in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

58in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

12in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2006 Honda Civic passed first time about 2 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2005 and 2007 model years. In 2025, 52.8% of 11,109 first MOTs on the 2006 Honda Civic passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 62.6%. Among 5,239 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Shock absorbers (front) appears more often than on similar cars (8.1% of those tests; 421 observed failures; about 3.9× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2006 Honda Civic at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (17.6%), Headlight aim (11.7%) and Headlight (8.9%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Shock absorbers (front) (8.1% of those tests; 421 observed failures; about 3.9× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Shock absorbers (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (8.1% of those tests; 421 observed failures; about 3.9× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2006 Honda Civic include Shock absorbers (front), Side repeater indicators, Anti-roll bar ball joint (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2006 Honda Civic (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check