Model Reports 4 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

Ford Puma 2020: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 89 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2020 Ford Puma were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre condition (front).

Summary

A 2020 Ford Puma passed first time about 3 in every 100 less often than the 2021 model year next to it.

At a glance

How 25,019 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
89 in every 100
Did not pass first time
11 in every 1002,701 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
5 yearsabout 32,916 miles
First tests counted
25,019

What failed most often

  1. Tyre condition (front)15 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Tyre pressure monitoring system13 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Brake pads (rear)11 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2020 Ford Puma vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre pressure monitoring system, 6.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,701 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Tyre pressure monitoring system

Failed on 359 first tests6.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A tyre pressure monitoring system that is obviously inoperative is graded Major, and so is one listed as malfunctioning or obviously inoperative. The Minor row uses the word malfunctioning too, but its detail is a warning lamp indicating a fault, and it also covers a tyre that is obviously under-inflated.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: petrol emissions (with catalyst), 2.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 57 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One wear pattern: brake discs (rear), 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 107 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail.

Steering universal joint

Noted on 21 first tests96 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Exhaust system (front)

Noted on 32 first tests5.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Brake fluid

Noted on 20 first tests3.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Tyre condition

Noted on 34 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

Wheel condition (front)

Noted on 47 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
89in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
2in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
9in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 89.2% of 25,019 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 91.1%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 2 fixed and the 9 not fixed make the 11 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
2020 This car89 in every 10025,019
202193 in every 10027,312
202292 in every 10033,463

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 92 in every 100 passed first time.

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2020 Puma.

Of 2020 Puma vehicles with under 22,000 miles, 94 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 46,000 miles or more, 82 in every 100 did.

Under 22,0004,851 tests
94
22,000–30,0005,503 tests
92
30,000–37,000 Typical car4,967 tests
91
37,000–46,0004,759 tests
87
46,000 and over4,939 tests
82

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 22,00030,000–37,00046,000 and over
Tyre condition (front)1.21.32.4
Tyre pressure monitoring system0.21.13.7
Brake pads (rear)0.41.31.7
Tyre tread depth (front)0.10.82.4
Windscreen washers0.50.61.1

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.

When a car fails

66in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

11in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

4in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2020 Ford Puma passed first time about 3 in every 100 less often than the 2021 model year next to it. In 2025, 89.2% of 25,019 first MOTs on the 2020 Ford Puma passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 91.1%. Among 2,701 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Petrol emissions (with catalyst) appears more often than on similar cars (2.1% of those tests; 57 observed failures; about 2.8× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2020 Ford Puma at the first attempt were Tyre condition (front) (15.2%), Tyre pressure monitoring system (13.3%) and Brake pads (rear) (11.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Petrol emissions (with catalyst) (2.1% of those tests; 57 observed failures; about 2.8× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Petrol emissions (with catalyst) shows up more often than on similar cars (2.1% of those tests; 57 observed failures; about 2.8× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2020 Ford Puma include Petrol emissions (with catalyst). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2020 Ford Puma (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check