Ford Focus 2013: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 62 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2013 Ford Focus were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Coil spring (front).

Summary

The 2013 Ford Focus follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 67,752 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
62 in every 100
Did not pass first time
38 in every 10025,818 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
12 yearsabout 91,186 miles
First tests counted
67,752

What failed most often

  1. Coil spring (front)17 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)14 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Headlight aim10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2013 Ford Focus vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar linkage (rear): 28 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 25,786 of 25,818 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Anti-roll bar linkage (rear)

Failed on 827 first tests28 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

An anti-roll bar linkage is graded Dangerous when a suspension component is missing, likely to become detached, fractured or likely to fail. Insecure attachment that impairs directional stability is graded Dangerous too. Excessive damage or corrosion that seriously weakens the part is Major, and so is plain insecure attachment to the chassis or axle.

Coil spring (front)

Failed on 4,447 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

Three faults. The strongest is the horn: 5.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Horn

Failed on 1,373 first tests5.5 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A horn that does not work, or is likely to be confused with an emergency vehicle siren, is graded Major. Gongs, bells, sirens and anything with more than one tone, which includes a horn that alternates between its notes, are not allowed, except a gong, bell or siren on vehicles first used before a set date. Sound defects are Minor for named cases such as a bell or harsh sound, and Major under a general row.

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Failed on 1,329 first tests4.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 1,315 first tests, 4.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Side repeater indicators

Failed on 847 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Sequential or dynamic direction indicators are not a reason to fail. Where a side repeater is required, it is allowed to be part of the front direction indicator if it has a marked wraparound lens, or an amber light coming through the front lens when viewed from a set distance to the side of the rear bumper. A lens defect with no effect on the emitted light is Minor, and one that adversely affects the light is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/07/2008), 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/07/2008)

Failed on 749 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Anti-roll bar (rear)

Noted on 450 first tests10 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

All direction indicators (rear)

Noted on 81 first tests7.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 2,090 first tests5.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Anti-roll bar linkage pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 92 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

All direction indicators (front)

Noted on 21 first tests3.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Individual direction indicators (front)

Noted on 441 first tests3.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Structural sub-frame condition (rear)

Noted on 96 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
62in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
8in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
30in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 61.9% of 67,752 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 70.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 30 not fixed make the 38 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol37,01679,099 miles6361
Diesel30,736109,474 miles6062

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002005201020132020Older carsNewer cars
4060801002000201020132020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 64 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199952 in every 100910
200053 in every 1001,696
200154 in every 1003,892
200252 in every 1006,783
200355 in every 1008,641
200452 in every 10011,427
200554 in every 10015,756
200657 in every 10022,078
200757 in every 10031,159
200855 in every 10037,319
200955 in every 10046,757
201056 in every 10047,851
201158 in every 10057,244
201261 in every 10061,916
2013 This car62 in every 10067,752
201464 in every 10069,468
201572 in every 10071,323
201677 in every 10060,894
201781 in every 10060,958
201882 in every 10045,414
201981 in every 10052,713
202086 in every 10036,414
202189 in every 10020,069
202290 in every 10014,931

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2013 Focus.

Of 2013 Focus vehicles with under 65,000 miles, 72 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 122,000 miles or more, 56 in every 100 did.

Under 65,00013,387 tests
72
65,000–83,00013,518 tests
65
83,000–100,000 Typical car13,842 tests
60
100,000–122,00013,460 tests
57
122,000 and over13,482 tests
56

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol79,099 miles6361
Diesel109,474 miles6062

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 109,474 against 79,099). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 65,00083,000–100,000122,000 and over
Coil spring (front)7.36.65.9
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)2.06.37.8
Headlight aim1.53.95.5
Tyre condition (front)1.92.23.2
Tyre tread depth (front)1.22.83.5

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

36in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

37in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

9in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2013 Ford Focus follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Coil spring (front), about 17 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 61.9% of 67,752 first MOTs on the 2013 Ford Focus passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 70.2%. Among 25,818 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Anti-roll bar linkage (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (3.2% of those tests; 827 observed failures; about 28× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2013 Ford Focus at the first attempt were Coil spring (front) (17.2%), Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (14.4%) and Headlight aim (9.7%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Anti-roll bar linkage (rear) (3.2% of those tests; 827 observed failures; about 28× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Anti-roll bar linkage (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (3.2% of those tests; 827 observed failures; about 28× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2013 Ford Focus include Anti-roll bar linkage (rear), Horn, Individual direction indicators (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2013 Ford Focus (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check