Model Reports
8 min readUpdated 11 Sep 2026
DVSA open data · 22,078 tests analysed
Ford Focus 2006: reliability & common MOT faults
9,386 first-attempt MOT failures were recorded on the 2006 Ford Focus in 2025. The items recorded most often on them were Position lamp (front) and Rbt (sp). Figures are among first-attempt failed MOT tests, not among all tests.
Petrol Focus passed first time 2.8 pp more often than diesel ones (57.8% of 19,669 vs 55.0% of 2,407).
First-attempt pass
57.5%
of 22,078 first tests (2025)
First tests
22,078
test year 2025
Failed first attempts
9,386
failed first-attempt tests
Most common fail
11.5%
Position lamp (front)
MOT pass rates
First-attempt and official-style rates among class 4 first tests of the year.
First-attempt pass
57.5%
of 22,078 first tests (2025)
Official-style pass
66.7%
incl. same-day PRS fixes
First tests
22,078
class 4 · first MOT of the year
Typical age 19.0 yrs · median mileage 105,595 mi
vs 2024:
+1.1 pp first-attempt
Note:
Class 4 cars · first MOT of the year per vehicle · P/PRS/F outcomes (2025 data).
PRS (fixed at the station the same day) counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate.
Raw outcomes for this cohort — not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix.
MOT doesn't test engine or gearbox internals.
Common faults
Failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars.
These MOT failure patterns show up more often on this registration year than on
similar cars of the same class, age, and mileage.
Shares below are measured across the 9,243 of
9,386 failed first attempts
(98.5%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025 —
the subset the age-and-mileage comparison can be computed on.
Standout: Pins and bushes (rear) — 4.2% of this year's failed first attempts
Recorded on 386 of those tests. It tops the table on elevation — about 4.6× more often than on similar cars of the same age and mileage. That is what makes it unusual for its class, which is a different question from what is most likely to fail; the buying checklist ranks by that. The full ranked list is in the table below.
No patterns met the strongest callout thresholds on this page; showing the highest-lift
rows that still cleared the display floors.
Fault pattern
Location
Failures
vs similar cars
Share of fails
Confidence
Pins and bushes (rear)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Pins and bushes
Rear
386
×4.6
4.2%
Likely
Individual direction indicators (rear)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Direction indicators > Flashing type > Individual direction indicators
Rear
574
×2.6
6.2%
Possible
Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown
(at least 20 failures and about
2.0× more often than similar cars).
Note: Rates and comparisons are among first-attempt failed tests, not all MOTs. Patterns come from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer service bulletins, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Failures and advisories are listed separately.
Advisories
Notes recorded at the test that appear more often than on similar cars.
Advisory notes recorded on failed first-attempt tests that appear more often than on similar cars.
Advisory pattern
Location
Notes
vs similar cars
Share
Confidence
Body — Panel (front)
Body, chassis, structure > Body > Panel
Front
50
×16
0.5%
Strong
All direction indicators
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Direction indicators > Flashing type > All direction indicators
Any
46
×6.9
0.5%
Possible
Anti-roll bars — Linkage (rear)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Linkage
Rear
23
×6.4
0.2%
Strong
Visibility — Bonnet
Visibility > Bonnet
Any
23
×6.0
0.2%
Likely
Linkage ball joints (rear)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Linkage ball joints
Rear
399
×5.7
4.3%
Possible
Ball joint (rear)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Ball joint
Rear
75
×5.4
0.8%
Possible
Suspension arm (rear)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Suspension arm
Rear
912
×5.0
9.9%
Possible
Individual direction indicators (front)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Direction indicators > Flashing type > Individual direction indicators
Front
342
×3.9
3.7%
Elevated
Note: Advisories are not a fail rate — they flag issues noted at the test, often before they become failures.
If you are buying one
What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.
On this year, prefer the petrol. The diesel cars passed first time 2.8 pp less often, on 2,407 tests.
This year also sits 1.8 pp above the midpoint of the 2005 and 2007 cars either side of it — a real break in the model's own run, not the usual year-on-year drift.
Other Focus years worth knowing about
Newer cars always pass more often, so a plain "best year" list would just
rank by age. These are the years that beat or miss the trend their own
neighbouring years set — the only age-adjusted signal this data supports.
The items that failed 2006 Focus most
often, as a share of the year's failed first attempts. This is what goes
wrong, not what is unusual — the table further up the page covers that.
Position lamp (front) — recorded on 11.5% of failed first attempts
Rbt (sp) — recorded on 7.8% of failed first attempts
Stop lamp — recorded on 7.7% of failed first attempts
Pins and bushes (front) — recorded on 7.1% of failed first attempts
Tyres — Condition (front) — recorded on 7.0% of failed first attempts
Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this
model line. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a
pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.
FAQs
Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.
Petrol Focus passed first time 2.8 pp more often than diesel ones (57.8% of 19,669 vs 55.0% of 2,407). In 2025, 57.5% of 22,078 first MOTs on the 2006 Ford Focus passed first time (PRS — items fixed at the station the same day — counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 66.7%. Among 9,386 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Pins and bushes (rear) appears more often than on similar car…
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that failed 2006 Ford Focuss most often at the first attempt were Position lamp (front) (11.5%), Rbt (sp) (7.8%) and Stop lamp (7.7%) — each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong on the car. It is a different question from which patterns are unusual for the class, which the common-faults table answers.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Pins and bushes (rear) (4.2% of those tests; 386 observed failures; about 4.6× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Pins and bushes (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (4.2% of those tests; 386 observed failures; about 4.6× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault — age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2006 Ford Focus include Pins and bushes (rear), Individual direction indicators (rear). These patterns show up more often than on similar cars after we filter out sparse noise — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2006 Ford Focus (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.
About this data
How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.
These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars — not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.
20242025
What we include
UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.
Same-day repairs
PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.
How we compare
We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.
What this does not cover
MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics — this is not a full reliability score.
Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
Age and mileage matching reduces — but does not remove — differences in how cars were used and maintained.
We never invent pass rates, star scores, or ranks when those data marts are missing.