Model Reports 8 min read Updated 11 Sep 2026 DVSA open data · 7,199 tests analysed

BMW X5 2022: reliability & common MOT faults

1,138 first-attempt MOT failures were recorded on the 2022 BMW X5 in 2025. The items recorded most often on them were Tyres — Condition (rear) and Side repeaters. Figures are among first-attempt failed MOT tests, not among all tests.

Other-fuel X5 passed first time 3.0 pp more often than hybrid ones (85.5% of 3,637 vs 82.5% of 3,064).

First-attempt pass

84.2%

of 7,199 first tests (2025)

First tests

7,199

test year 2025

Failed first attempts

1,138

failed first-attempt tests

Most common fail

49.4%

Tyres — Condition (rear)

MOT pass rates

First-attempt and official-style rates among class 4 first tests of the year.

First-attempt pass

84.2%

of 7,199 first tests (2025)

Official-style pass

85.5%

incl. same-day PRS fixes

First tests

7,199

class 4 · first MOT of the year

Typical age 3.0 yrs · median mileage 30,365 mi

vs 2024: -3.7 pp first-attempt

Note:

  • Class 4 cars · first MOT of the year per vehicle · P/PRS/F outcomes (2025 data).
  • PRS (fixed at the station the same day) counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate.
  • Raw outcomes for this cohort — not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix.
  • MOT doesn't test engine or gearbox internals.

Common faults

Failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars.

These MOT failure patterns show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age, and mileage.

Shares below are measured across the 1,138 failed first attempts in 2025 that the age-and-mileage comparison can be computed on.

Standout: Side repeaters — 6.4% of this year's failed first attempts

Recorded on 73 of those tests. It tops the table on elevation — about 9.6× more often than on similar cars of the same age and mileage. That is what makes it unusual for its class, which is a different question from what is most likely to fail; the buying checklist ranks by that. The full ranked list is in the table below.

No patterns met the strongest callout thresholds on this page; showing the highest-lift rows that still cleared the display floors.

Fault pattern Location Failures vs similar cars Share of fails Confidence
Side repeaters
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Direction indicators > Flashing type > Side repeaters
 Any 73 ×9.6 6.4% Likely
Registration plates (rear)
Identification of the vehicle > Registration plates
 Rear 38 ×2.7 3.3% Possible
Registration plates (front)
Identification of the vehicle > Registration plates
 Front 38 ×2.6 3.3% Possible
Malfunction indicator lamp
Noise, emissions and leaks > Exhaust emissions > Compression ignition > Malfunction indicator lamp
 Any 29 ×2.4 2.5% Possible

Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and about 2.0× more often than similar cars).

Note: Rates and comparisons are among first-attempt failed tests, not all MOTs. Patterns come from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer service bulletins, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Failures and advisories are listed separately.

Wear patterns

Usage and mileage effects that often track road use rather than model design.

These patterns look like wear or usage effects rather than model-specific design faults. Tyres, brake friction material, and alignment-related defects often track mileage and road use.

Pattern Location Failures vs similar cars Share of fails Confidence
Tyres — Condition (rear)
Tyres > Condition
 Rear 562 ×2.9 49.4% Wear
Note: These patterns are not treated as a model design fault in our common-faults ranking.

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

On this year, prefer the other-fuel. The hybrid cars passed first time 3.0 pp less often, on 3,064 tests.

Other X5 years worth knowing about

Newer cars always pass more often, so a plain "best year" list would just rank by age. These are the years that beat or miss the trend their own neighbouring years set — the only age-adjusted signal this data supports.

Year vs the years either side First-attempt pass (rises with newer cars) First tests
2020 X5 +1.7 pp better 88.0% 4,592
2018 X5 -1.4 pp worse 85.4% 6,560

What to check on a 2022 X5

The items that failed 2022 X5 most often, as a share of the year's failed first attempts. This is what goes wrong, not what is unusual — the table further up the page covers that.

  • Tyres — Condition (rear) — recorded on 49.4% of failed first attempts
  • Side repeaters — recorded on 6.4% of failed first attempts

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

Other-fuel X5 passed first time 3.0 pp more often than hybrid ones (85.5% of 3,637 vs 82.5% of 3,064). In 2025, 84.2% of 7,199 first MOTs on the 2022 BMW X5 passed first time (PRS — items fixed at the station the same day — counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 85.5%. Among 1,138 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Side repeaters appears more often than on similar cars (6.4% of th…
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that failed 2022 BMW X5s most often at the first attempt were Tyres — Condition (rear) (49.4%) and Side repeaters (6.4%) — each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong on the car. It is a different question from which patterns are unusual for the class, which the common-faults table answers.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Side repeaters (6.4% of those tests; 73 observed failures; about 9.6× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Side repeaters shows up more often than on similar cars (6.4% of those tests; 73 observed failures; about 9.6× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault — age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2022 BMW X5 include Side repeaters, Registration plates (rear), Malfunction indicator lamp. These patterns show up more often than on similar cars after we filter out sparse noise — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2022 BMW X5 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars — not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics — this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces — but does not remove — differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • We never invent pass rates, star scores, or ranks when those data marts are missing.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check