Volvo XC90 2019: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 86 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2019 Volvo XC90 were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre condition (front).

Summary

The 2019 Volvo XC90 follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 6,859 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
86 in every 100
Did not pass first time
14 in every 100949 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
6 yearsabout 56,724 miles
First tests counted
6,859

What failed most often

  1. Tyre condition (front)23 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Brake pads (rear)18 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre tread depth (front)7 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2019 Volvo XC90 vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

One fault: suspension arm ball joint (front), 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 949 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension arm ball joint (front)

Failed on 53 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension arm ball joint is failed under the general suspension pin, bush or joint wording. Excessively worn is Major, and likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 93 first tests, 9.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

One wear pattern: brake pads (rear), 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake pads (rear)

Failed on 170 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Number plates and VIN

One fault: number plates (rear), 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Number plates (rear)

Failed on 20 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A number plate that is missing, illegible, showing an incorrect registration or so insecure that it is likely to fall off is Major. Testers do not measure the characters or their spacing and reject them only if they are obviously incorrect. Delamination and the position of fixing screws or bolts get particular attention, as they can prevent number plate recognition cameras identifying the vehicle.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 42 first tests, 3.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Tyres

Two wear patterns. The strongest is the tyre condition (front): 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre condition (front)

Failed on 217 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Exposed or damaged ply or cords are graded Dangerous. A cut in excess of the requirements and deep enough to reach the ply or cords is Major, and testers may open the cut with a blunt instrument to check its depth. A tyre contacting the vehicle through flexing or suspension movement is not a defect; fouling fails only at the time of test.

Tyre condition (rear)

Failed on 204 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Exposed or damaged ply or cords are graded Dangerous. A cut in excess of the requirements and deep enough to reach the ply or cords is Major, and testers may open the cut with a blunt instrument to check its depth. A tyre contacting the vehicle through flexing or suspension movement is not a defect; fouling fails only at the time of test.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
86in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
1in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
13in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 86.2% of 6,859 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 87.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 1 fixed and the 13 not fixed make the 14 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

By fuel type

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel3,80760,331 miles8687
Petrol1,72648,478 miles8584
Hybrid1,32158,214 miles8686

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020152019Older carsNewer cars
40608010020102019Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 87 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200357 in every 100466
200455 in every 1001,446
200555 in every 1002,213
200656 in every 1001,817
200757 in every 1001,951
200858 in every 1001,313
200961 in every 1002,890
201063 in every 1005,304
201164 in every 1003,915
201269 in every 1002,736
201371 in every 1002,296
201469 in every 1002,176
201580 in every 1002,620
201680 in every 1004,981
201782 in every 1005,275
201885 in every 1006,004
2019 This car86 in every 1006,859
202086 in every 1004,650
202187 in every 1006,508
202287 in every 1006,003

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage makes a modest difference on a 2019 Volvo XC90.

Of 2019 Volvo XC90 vehicles with under 41,000 miles, 91 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 76,000 miles or more, 84 in every 100 did.

Under 41,0001,369 tests
91
41,000–52,0001,423 tests
86
52,000–62,000 Typical car1,321 tests
86
62,000–76,0001,384 tests
84
76,000 and over1,362 tests
84

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel60,331 miles8687
Petrol48,478 miles8584

Figures are in every 100 first tests. At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 41,00052,000–62,00076,000 and over
Tyre condition (front)2.33.82.9
Brake pads (rear)1.72.32.2
Tyre tread depth (front)0.41.21.4
Suspension arm ball joint (front)0.00.51.6

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

61in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

13in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

7in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2019 Volvo XC90 follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Tyre condition (front), about 23 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 86.2% of 6,859 first MOTs on the 2019 Volvo XC90 passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 87.4%. Among 949 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension arm ball joint (front) appears more often than on similar cars (5.6% of those tests; 53 observed failures; about 2.5× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2019 Volvo XC90 at the first attempt were Tyre condition (front) (22.9%), Brake pads (rear) (17.9%) and Tyre tread depth (front) (7.0%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension arm ball joint (front) (5.6% of those tests; 53 observed failures; about 2.5× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension arm ball joint (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (5.6% of those tests; 53 observed failures; about 2.5× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2019 Volvo XC90 include Suspension arm ball joint (front), Number plates (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2019 Volvo XC90 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check