Model Reports 8 min read Updated 11 Sep 2026 DVSA open data · 2,921 tests analysed

Volkswagen Touran 2006: reliability & common MOT faults

1,390 first-attempt MOT failures were recorded on the 2006 Volkswagen Touran in 2025. The items recorded most often on them were Drive shafts — Joints (front) and Pins and bushes (front). Figures are among first-attempt failed MOT tests, not among all tests.

Diesel Tourans passed first time 3.7 pp more often than petrol ones (52.9% of 2,495 vs 49.3% of 426).

First-attempt pass

52.4%

of 2,921 first tests (2025)

First tests

2,921

test year 2025

Failed first attempts

1,390

failed first-attempt tests

Most common fail

18.5%

Drive shafts — Joints (front)

MOT pass rates

First-attempt and official-style rates among class 4 first tests of the year.

First-attempt pass

52.4%

of 2,921 first tests (2025)

Official-style pass

60.3%

incl. same-day PRS fixes

First tests

2,921

class 4 · first MOT of the year

Typical age 19.0 yrs · median mileage 143,988 mi

vs 2024: +0.4 pp first-attempt

Note:

  • Class 4 cars · first MOT of the year per vehicle · P/PRS/F outcomes (2025 data).
  • PRS (fixed at the station the same day) counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate.
  • Raw outcomes for this cohort — not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix.
  • MOT doesn't test engine or gearbox internals.

Common faults

Failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars.

These MOT failure patterns show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age, and mileage.

Shares below are measured across the 1,364 of 1,390 failed first attempts (98.1%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025 — the subset the age-and-mileage comparison can be computed on.

Standout: Electronic stability control — 3.7% of this year's failed first attempts

Recorded on 50 of those tests. It tops the table on elevation — about 3.7× more often than on similar cars of the same age and mileage. That is what makes it unusual for its class, which is a different question from what is most likely to fail; the buying checklist ranks by that. The full ranked list is in the table below.

No patterns met the strongest callout thresholds on this page; showing the highest-lift rows that still cleared the display floors.

Fault pattern Location Failures vs similar cars Share of fails Confidence
Electronic stability control
Brakes > ABS / EBS / ESC > Electronic stability control
 Any 50 ×3.7 3.7% Likely
Malfunction indicator lamp
Noise, emissions and leaks > Exhaust emissions > Compression ignition > Malfunction indicator lamp
 Any 54 ×3.5 4.0% Likely
SRS malfunction indicator lamp
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems > SRS malfunction indicator lamp
 Any 154 ×3.4 11.3% Likely
Flexible brake hoses (rear)
Brakes > Flexible brake hoses
 Rear 46 ×2.7 3.4% Possible
Pins and bushes (front)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Pins and bushes
 Front 167 ×2.5 12.2% Possible
Drive shafts — Joints (front)
Body, chassis, structure > Transmission > Drive shafts > Joints
 Front 252 ×2.4 18.5% Possible
Diesel emissions test (pre-reg turbo rules before 01/07/2008) Any 73 ×2.3 5.4% Possible
Flexible brake hoses (front)
Brakes > Flexible brake hoses
 Front 47 ×2.2 3.4% Possible

Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and about 2.0× more often than similar cars).

Note: Rates and comparisons are among first-attempt failed tests, not all MOTs. Patterns come from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer service bulletins, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Failures and advisories are listed separately.

Advisories

Notes recorded at the test that appear more often than on similar cars.

Advisory notes recorded on failed first-attempt tests that appear more often than on similar cars.

Advisory pattern Location Notes vs similar cars Share Confidence
Seat belts — Condition (rear)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems > Seat belts > Condition
 Rear 73 ×8.9 5.4% Elevated
Linkage ball joints (rear)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Linkage ball joints
 Rear 68 ×4.1 5.0% Elevated
Anti-roll bar (rear)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Anti-roll bar
 Rear 24 ×3.0 1.8% Elevated
Shock absorbers (front)
Suspension > Shock absorbers
 Front 165 ×2.8 12.1% Elevated
Pins and bushes (front)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Pins and bushes
 Front 306 ×2.4 22.4% Possible
Other suspension component (rear)
Suspension > Other suspension component > Other suspension component
 Rear 27 ×2.2 2.0% Elevated
Pins and bushes (rear)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Pins and bushes
 Rear 94 ×2.0 6.9% Elevated
Individual direction indicators (front)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Direction indicators > Flashing type > Individual direction indicators
 Front 27 ×2.0 2.0% Elevated
Note: Advisories are not a fail rate — they flag issues noted at the test, often before they become failures.

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

On this year, prefer the diesel. The petrol cars passed first time 3.6 pp less often, on 426 tests.

Other Touran years worth knowing about

Newer cars always pass more often, so a plain "best year" list would just rank by age. These are the years that beat or miss the trend their own neighbouring years set — the only age-adjusted signal this data supports.

Year vs the years either side First-attempt pass (rises with newer cars) First tests
2010 Touran -4.1 pp worse 57.1% 4,410

What to check on a 2006 Touran

The items that failed 2006 Tourans most often, as a share of the year's failed first attempts. This is what goes wrong, not what is unusual — the table further up the page covers that.

  • Drive shafts — Joints (front) — recorded on 18.5% of failed first attempts
  • Pins and bushes (front) — recorded on 12.2% of failed first attempts
  • SRS malfunction indicator lamp — recorded on 11.3% of failed first attempts
  • Tyres — Condition (rear) — recorded on 10.3% of failed first attempts
  • Visibility — Washers — recorded on 8.0% of failed first attempts

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

Diesel Tourans passed first time 3.7 pp more often than petrol ones (52.9% of 2,495 vs 49.3% of 426). In 2025, 52.4% of 2,921 first MOTs on the 2006 Volkswagen Touran passed first time (PRS — items fixed at the station the same day — counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 60.3%. Among 1,390 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Electronic stability control appears more often than on…
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that failed 2006 Volkswagen Tourans most often at the first attempt were Drive shafts — Joints (front) (18.5%), Pins and bushes (front) (12.2%) and SRS malfunction indicator lamp (11.3%) — each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong on the car. It is a different question from which patterns are unusual for the class, which th…
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Electronic stability control (3.7% of those tests; 50 observed failures; about 3.7× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Electronic stability control shows up more often than on similar cars (3.7% of those tests; 50 observed failures; about 3.7× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault — age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2006 Volkswagen Touran include Electronic stability control, Malfunction indicator lamp, SRS malfunction indicator lamp. These patterns show up more often than on similar cars after we filter out sparse noise — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2006 Volkswagen Touran (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars — not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics — this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces — but does not remove — differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • We never invent pass rates, star scores, or ranks when those data marts are missing.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check