Model Reports
8 min readUpdated 11 Sep 2026
DVSA open data · 42,231 tests analysed
Volkswagen Polo 2018: reliability & common MOT faults
10,728 first-attempt MOT failures were recorded on the 2018 Volkswagen Polo in 2025. The items recorded most often on them were Track rod end (front) and Tread depth (front). Figures are among first-attempt failed MOT tests, not among all tests.
Petrol Polos passed first time 2.1 pp more often than diesel ones (74.6% of 41,929 vs 72.5% of 302).
First-attempt pass
74.6%
of 42,231 first tests (2025)
First tests
42,231
test year 2025
Failed first attempts
10,728
failed first-attempt tests
Most common fail
39.1%
Track rod end (front)
MOT pass rates
First-attempt and official-style rates among class 4 first tests of the year.
First-attempt pass
74.6%
of 42,231 first tests (2025)
Official-style pass
78.0%
incl. same-day PRS fixes
First tests
42,231
class 4 · first MOT of the year
Typical age 7.0 yrs · median mileage 45,747 mi
vs 2024:
-1.1 pp first-attempt
Note:
Class 4 cars · first MOT of the year per vehicle · P/PRS/F outcomes (2025 data).
PRS (fixed at the station the same day) counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate.
Raw outcomes for this cohort — not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix.
MOT doesn't test engine or gearbox internals.
Common faults
Failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars.
These MOT failure patterns show up more often on this registration year than on
similar cars of the same class, age, and mileage.
Shares below are measured across the 10,726 of
10,728 failed first attempts that recorded an
odometer reading in 2025 —
the subset the age-and-mileage comparison can be computed on.
Standout: Track rod end (front) — 39.1% of this year's failed first attempts
Recorded on 4,194 of those tests. It tops the table on elevation — about 16× more often than on similar cars of the same age and mileage. On this year it is also the commonest failure, so it answers both questions at once. The full ranked list is in the table below.
Fault pattern
Location
Failures
vs similar cars
Share of fails
Confidence
Track rod end (front)
Steering > Steering linkage components > Track rod end
Front
4,194
×16
39.1%
Strong
Shock absorbers (front)
Suspension > Shock absorbers
Front
600
×4.8
5.6%
Likely
Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown
(at least 20 failures and about
2.0× more often than similar cars).
Note: Rates and comparisons are among first-attempt failed tests, not all MOTs. Patterns come from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer service bulletins, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Failures and advisories are listed separately.
Advisories
Notes recorded at the test that appear more often than on similar cars.
Advisory notes recorded on failed first-attempt tests that appear more often than on similar cars.
Advisory pattern
Location
Notes
vs similar cars
Share
Confidence
Parking brake control — Lever
Brakes > Parking brake control > Lever
Any
69
×11
0.6%
Elevated
Shock absorbers (front)
Suspension > Shock absorbers
Front
1,030
×4.9
9.6%
Likely
Service brake imbalance (rear)
Brakes > Brake performance > Service brake performance > Rbt > Service brake imbalance
Rear
28
×2.1
0.3%
Elevated
Note: Advisories are not a fail rate — they flag issues noted at the test, often before they become failures.
If you are buying one
What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.
On this year, prefer the petrol. The diesel cars passed first time 2.1 pp less often, on 302 tests.
This year also sits 2.9 pp below the midpoint of the 2017 and 2019 cars either side of it — a real break in the model's own run, not the usual year-on-year drift.
Other Polo years worth knowing about
Newer cars always pass more often, so a plain "best year" list would just
rank by age. These are the years that beat or miss the trend their own
neighbouring years set — the only age-adjusted signal this data supports.
The items that failed 2018 Polos most
often, as a share of the year's failed first attempts. This is what goes
wrong, not what is unusual — the table further up the page covers that.
Track rod end (front) — recorded on 39.1% of failed first attempts
Tread depth (front) — recorded on 6.9% of failed first attempts
Visibility — Washers — recorded on 6.7% of failed first attempts
Shock absorbers (front) — recorded on 5.6% of failed first attempts
Brake pads (front) — recorded on 5.3% of failed first attempts
Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this
model line. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a
pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.
FAQs
Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.
Petrol Polos passed first time 2.1 pp more often than diesel ones (74.6% of 41,929 vs 72.5% of 302). In 2025, 74.6% of 42,231 first MOTs on the 2018 Volkswagen Polo passed first time (PRS — items fixed at the station the same day — counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 78.0%. Among 10,728 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Track rod end (front) appears more often than on similar…
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that failed 2018 Volkswagen Polos most often at the first attempt were Track rod end (front) (39.1%), Tread depth (front) (6.9%) and Visibility — Washers (6.7%) — each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong on the car. It is a different question from which patterns are unusual for the class, which the common-faults table answ…
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Track rod end (front) (39.1% of those tests; 4,194 observed failures; about 16× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Track rod end (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (39.1% of those tests; 4,194 observed failures; about 16× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault — age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2018 Volkswagen Polo include Track rod end (front), Shock absorbers (front). These patterns show up more often than on similar cars after we filter out sparse noise — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2018 Volkswagen Polo (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.
About this data
How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.
These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars — not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.
20242025
What we include
UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.
Same-day repairs
PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.
How we compare
We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.
What this does not cover
MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics — this is not a full reliability score.
Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
Age and mileage matching reduces — but does not remove — differences in how cars were used and maintained.
We never invent pass rates, star scores, or ranks when those data marts are missing.