Volkswagen Polo 2013: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 62 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2013 Volkswagen Polo were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Suspension arm pins and bushes (front).

Summary

A 2013 Volkswagen Polo passed first time about 1 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2012 and 2014 model years.

At a glance

How 36,830 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
62 in every 100
Did not pass first time
38 in every 10013,938 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
12 yearsabout 75,562 miles
First tests counted
36,830

What failed most often

  1. Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)9 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Headlight aim9 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Coil spring (front)8 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2013 Volkswagen Polo vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Four faults. The strongest is the brake hand lever: 6.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 13,934 of 13,938 failed first attempts that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Brake hand lever

Failed on 327 first tests6.5 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A brake lever is failed for insufficient reserve only if it is touching the floor or handlebar. On motorcycle derived systems the lever may touch the handlebar, so the extent of reserve travel is assessed during the brake test. A lever not releasing correctly is Minor, and Major where the functionality of the brakes is affected.

Handbrake lever

Failed on 486 first tests5.2 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism that is obviously worn is graded Minor. It is Major when worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release, and also when the ratchet is not holding correctly. A lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 34 first tests, 3.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake imbalance across an axle (roller test, efficiency check, rear)

Failed on 336 first tests3.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A wheel giving less than a set share of the maximum effort from the other wheel on the same axle is Major. On a steered axle, less than half is graded Dangerous. Testers disregard an imbalance if the lower effort is the result of a locked wheel, or if the higher effort from a wheel is at or below a low set figure.

Brake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 789 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre pressure monitoring system, 4.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre pressure monitoring system

Failed on 303 first tests4.5 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A tyre pressure monitoring system that is obviously inoperative is graded Major, and so is one listed as malfunctioning or obviously inoperative. The Minor row uses the word malfunctioning too, but its detail is a warning lamp indicating a fault, and it also covers a tyre that is obviously under-inflated.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the shock absorbers (rear): 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Shock absorbers (rear)

Failed on 699 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)

Failed on 1,319 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the individual sidelight or tail light (rear): 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual sidelight or tail light (rear)

Failed on 550 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Headlight aim not tested (front)

Failed on 127 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Headlamp aim recorded as not tested, or unable to be tested, is a Major failure. These results must only be used where it becomes apparent during the test that the item cannot be tested, and this could not have been identified before starting. The reason must be included in the additional information box.

Number plate lights (rear)

Failed on 518 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Registration plate lamps must light up the rear registration plate and operate at the same time as the position lamps. A missing or inoperative lamp is Major when the plate has only one lamp or all its lamps are not working, and Minor when the plate has several lamps or light sources and not all have failed. A lamp throwing direct white light to the rear is also Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Body and structure

One fault: exhaust system, 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Exhaust system

Failed on 554 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Power steering pipes and hoses (front)

Noted on 106 first tests7.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Vehicle structure condition (front)

Noted on 58 first tests6.9 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Steering drag link end (front)

Noted on 24 first tests4.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Steering ball joint (front)

Noted on 44 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Chassis condition (front)

Noted on 24 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Steering rack play

Noted on 63 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake performance (plate test, rear)

Noted on 165 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
62in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
8in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
30in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 62.2% of 36,830 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 70.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 30 not fixed make the 38 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol33,50373,470 miles6362
Diesel3,324100,349 miles5761

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002005201020132020Older carsNewer cars
4060801002000201020132020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 63 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199857 in every 100347
199960 in every 100710
200053 in every 1001,908
200154 in every 1002,969
200248 in every 1004,711
200347 in every 1008,132
200447 in every 10010,245
200546 in every 10012,446
200648 in every 10016,464
200751 in every 10019,945
200850 in every 10022,110
200952 in every 10020,959
201055 in every 10034,091
201157 in every 10036,544
201260 in every 10035,425
2013 This car62 in every 10036,830
201466 in every 10042,662
201572 in every 10049,512
201674 in every 10049,981
201776 in every 10044,389
201875 in every 10042,231
201979 in every 10035,183
202086 in every 10025,440
202188 in every 10029,050
202292 in every 10021,988

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2013 Polo.

Of 2013 Polo vehicles with under 51,000 miles, 75 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 102,000 miles or more, 53 in every 100 did.

Under 51,0007,436 tests
75
51,000–68,0007,247 tests
66
68,000–83,000 Typical car7,263 tests
60
83,000–102,0007,593 tests
56
102,000 and over7,283 tests
53

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol73,470 miles6362
Diesel100,349 miles5761

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 100,349 against 73,470). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 51,00068,000–83,000102,000 and over
Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)2.13.94.8
Headlight aim2.04.14.6
Coil spring (front)2.63.32.8
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)0.62.45.6
Headlight (front)1.72.83.4

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

32in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

42in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

7in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2013 Volkswagen Polo passed first time about 1 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2012 and 2014 model years. In 2025, 62.2% of 36,830 first MOTs on the 2013 Volkswagen Polo passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 70.2%. Among 13,938 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Brake hand lever appears more often than on similar cars (2.3% of those tests; 327 observed failures; about 6.5× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2013 Volkswagen Polo at the first attempt were Suspension arm pins and bushes (front) (9.5%), Headlight aim (9.5%) and Coil spring (front) (7.6%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Brake hand lever (2.3% of those tests; 327 observed failures; about 6.5× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Brake hand lever shows up more often than on similar cars (2.3% of those tests; 327 observed failures; about 6.5× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2013 Volkswagen Polo include Brake hand lever, Handbrake lever, Brake imbalance across an axle (roller test, efficiency check, rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2013 Volkswagen Polo (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check