Volkswagen Passat 2010: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 62 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2010 Volkswagen Passat were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre condition (rear).

Summary

The 2010 Volkswagen Passat follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 9,539 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
62 in every 100
Did not pass first time
38 in every 1003,578 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
15 yearsabout 142,671 miles
First tests counted
9,539

What failed most often

  1. Tyre condition (rear)12 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Diesel engine warning light12 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Coil spring (front)11 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2010 Volkswagen Passat vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the suspension arm (rear): 6.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 3,578 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension arm (rear)

Failed on 284 first tests6.5 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a suspension arm. A component that is fractured, missing or likely to fail is graded Dangerous, and one excessively damaged or corroded is Major. On some vehicles, some highly stressed parts are thin pressed steel, and many of those have hollow box sections or up-facing areas that can collect road dirt and salt, so they get special attention.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 516 first tests, 4.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Coil spring (rear)

Failed on 354 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)

Failed on 101 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 417 first tests, 4.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: side repeater indicators (front), 4.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Side repeater indicators (front)

Failed on 270 first tests4.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Sequential or dynamic direction indicators are not a reason to fail. Where a side repeater is required, it is allowed to be part of the front direction indicator if it has a marked wraparound lens, or an amber light coming through the front lens when viewed from a set distance to the side of the rear bumper. A lens defect with no effect on the emitted light is Minor, and one that adversely affects the light is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: diesel engine warning light, 3.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel engine warning light

Failed on 422 first tests3.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

An engine malfunction indicator lamp that is illuminated to show a malfunction is graded Major on a diesel, but only on the diesels the test covers, which depends on the vehicle type and when it was first used. DVSA lists it under exhaust emissions for compression ignition engines, and the detail line for the row also names an inoperative lamp.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One fault: electronic stability control, 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Electronic stability control

Failed on 102 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

An ESC warning lamp is failed only when the tester is certain it indicates an ESC malfunction, because the lamp takes various forms and the owner's handbook may need checking. The system is also called ESP, VDC or DSC, among many other names. Every failure row is Major, covering the lamp, wheel speed sensors, wiring, other components and the switch.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre condition (rear), 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre condition (rear)

Failed on 429 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Exposed or damaged ply or cords are graded Dangerous. A cut in excess of the requirements and deep enough to reach the ply or cords is Major, and testers may open the cut with a blunt instrument to check its depth. A tyre contacting the vehicle through flexing or suspension movement is not a defect; fouling fails only at the time of test.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Anti-roll bar (rear)

Noted on 42 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear)

Noted on 80 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame (rear)

Noted on 551 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Structural sub-frame condition (rear)

Noted on 30 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
62in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
6in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
32in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 62.5% of 9,539 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 68.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 6 fixed and the 32 not fixed make the 38 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as tested
Diesel9,227143,933 miles62
Petrol31197,466 miles71

Figures are in every 100 first tests.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002005201020152020Older carsNewer cars
406080100200020102020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200056 in every 100353
200158 in every 100732
200261 in every 1001,268
200359 in every 1002,009
200460 in every 1002,309
200560 in every 1002,817
200657 in every 1003,744
200759 in every 1005,753
200860 in every 1007,149
200962 in every 1009,220
2010 This car62 in every 1009,539
201164 in every 10014,564
201265 in every 10012,714
201367 in every 10011,280
201469 in every 10013,875
201577 in every 10014,533
201679 in every 10014,196
201781 in every 10013,102
201884 in every 10010,052
201986 in every 1006,894
202088 in every 1005,426
202187 in every 1003,304
202287 in every 1002,281

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage makes a modest difference on a 2010 Passat.

Of 2010 Passat vehicles with under 109,000 miles, 67 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 181,000 miles or more, 60 in every 100 did.

Under 109,0001,921 tests
67
109,000–132,0001,883 tests
63
132,000–154,000 Typical car1,913 tests
62
154,000–181,0001,919 tests
60
181,000 and over1,901 tests
60

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 109,000132,000–154,000181,000 and over
Tyre condition (rear)4.14.54.9
Diesel engine warning light2.34.45.8
Coil spring (front)3.24.54.4
Suspension arm (rear)2.13.52.9
Side repeater indicators2.33.62.4

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

32in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

42in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

11in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2010 Volkswagen Passat follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Tyre condition (rear), about 12 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 62.5% of 9,539 first MOTs on the 2010 Volkswagen Passat passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 68.2%. Among 3,578 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension arm (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (7.9% of those tests; 284 observed failures; about 6.5× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2010 Volkswagen Passat at the first attempt were Tyre condition (rear) (12.0%), Diesel engine warning light (11.8%) and Coil spring (front) (10.6%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension arm (rear) (7.9% of those tests; 284 observed failures; about 6.5× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension arm (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (7.9% of those tests; 284 observed failures; about 6.5× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2010 Volkswagen Passat include Suspension arm (rear), Side repeater indicators (front), Diesel engine warning light. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2010 Volkswagen Passat (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check