Volkswagen Amarok 2015: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 70 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2015 Volkswagen Amarok were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test).

Summary

The 2015 Volkswagen Amarok follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 2,543 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
70 in every 100
Did not pass first time
30 in every 100754 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
10 yearsabout 106,454 miles
First tests counted
2,543

What failed most often

  1. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)16 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Shock absorbers (rear)11 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Coil spring (front)10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2015 Volkswagen Amarok vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Six faults. The strongest is the handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test): 48 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 754 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test)

Failed on 38 first tests48 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is graded Major, and efficiency less than half of the required value is graded Dangerous. This check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake has not already been tested as the secondary brake.

Brake imbalance across an axle (roller test, efficiency check, rear)

Failed on 24 first tests6.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A wheel giving less than a set share of the maximum effort from the other wheel on the same axle is Major. On a steered axle, less than half is graded Dangerous. Testers disregard an imbalance if the lower effort is the result of a locked wheel, or if the higher effort from a wheel is at or below a low set figure.

Anti-lock braking system (ABS)

Failed on 45 first tests4.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

ABS is failed as removed only where it has obviously been removed, because not every vehicle in the age range where removal is not permitted has ABS. A warning lamp that does not light or shows an ABS fault is Major, as is a missing or excessively damaged wheel speed sensor. Every failure row for this component is Major.

Brake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 61 first tests4.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 31 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 31 first tests4.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake that is inoperative on one side is Major. When tested on the road, the failure is the vehicle deviating excessively from a straight line. Vehicles whose parking brake was already tested as the secondary brake are not tested again for this.

Handbrake lever

Failed on 23 first tests4.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism that is obviously worn is graded Minor. It is Major when worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release, and also when the ratchet is not holding correctly. A lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front): 39 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front)

Failed on 71 first tests39 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

An anti-roll bar pin or bush that is excessively worn is Major, and one likely to become detached is graded Dangerous. The wording is DVSA's general rule for a suspension pin, bush or joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 56 first tests, 23 times as often as on similar cars.

Shock absorbers (rear)

Failed on 81 first tests4.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 83 first tests, 4.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Steering

One fault: steering rack, 22 times as often as on similar cars.

Steering rack

Failed on 27 first tests22 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Steering gear casing retaining devices dangerously loose, or visible relative movement to the chassis or bodywork, is graded Dangerous. A casing not properly attached, or fractured, is Major, but a fracture that affects the stability or attachment of the casing is Dangerous. A gaiter damaged but still keeping dirt out is Minor, and Major once missing or no longer doing so.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: rear fog light, 3.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Rear fog light

Failed on 34 first tests3.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing obligatory rear fog lamp, one that is not working, or one that does not emit a steady red light is graded Major. A rear fog lamp adversely affected by the operation of any other lamp is Major too. The manual allows it to go out when main beam is switched on or when dipped beam headlamps are switched off.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Coil spring (front)

Noted on 49 first tests8.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
70in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
6in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
24in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 70.3% of 2,543 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 76.1%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 6 fixed and the 24 not fixed make the 30 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020152020Older carsNewer cars
40608010020152020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 73 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
201161 in every 100508
201267 in every 1001,125
201369 in every 1001,678
201471 in every 1002,064
2015 This car70 in every 1002,543
201673 in every 1002,280
201778 in every 1002,010
201880 in every 1002,457
201982 in every 1002,820
202085 in every 1001,526

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2015 Amarok.

Of 2015 Amarok vehicles with under 77,000 miles, 79 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 143,000 miles or more, 63 in every 100 did.

Under 77,000508 tests
79
77,000–98,000526 tests
74
98,000–116,000 Typical car501 tests
69
116,000–143,000495 tests
66
143,000 and over513 tests
63

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 77,00098,000–116,000143,000 and over
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)2.03.89.6
Shock absorbers (rear)2.23.43.1
Coil spring (front)3.12.23.1
Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front)1.22.44.5
Brake performance (roller test, rear)2.03.22.1

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

32in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

40in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

6in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2015 Volkswagen Amarok follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test), about 16 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 70.3% of 2,543 first MOTs on the 2015 Volkswagen Amarok passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 76.1%. Among 754 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test) appears more often than on similar cars (5.0% of those tests; 38 observed failures; about 48× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2015 Volkswagen Amarok at the first attempt were Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (15.6%), Shock absorbers (rear) (10.7%) and Coil spring (front) (10.3%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test) (5.0% of those tests; 38 observed failures; about 48× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test) shows up more often than on similar cars (5.0% of those tests; 38 observed failures; about 48× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2015 Volkswagen Amarok include Handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test), Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front), Steering rack. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2015 Volkswagen Amarok (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check