Vauxhall Meriva 2009: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 50 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2009 Vauxhall Meriva were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Coil spring (rear).

Summary

The 2009 Vauxhall Meriva follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 4,150 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
50 in every 100
Did not pass first time
50 in every 1002,090 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
16 yearsabout 80,805 miles
First tests counted
4,150

What failed most often

  1. Coil spring (rear)10 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Individual sidelight or tail light (rear)9 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Headlight aim8 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2009 Vauxhall Meriva vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Three faults and two wear patterns. The strongest is the rigid brake pipes (front): 5.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,048 of 2,090 failed first attempts (98.0%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like. 2.0% of failures are excluded because no mileage was recorded, so treat these shares as indicative for this model year.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Failed on 112 first tests5.6 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 239 first tests, 3.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Flexible brake hoses (front)

Failed on 58 first tests5.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Testers reject a flexible brake hose for being excessively damaged or chafed only if it is severe enough to expose the reinforcement. Slight damage, chafing or twisting is graded Minor. A leak is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic braking system and Major on an air system, and a hose damaged and likely to fail is also Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 80 first tests, 3.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Failed on 139 first tests3.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 291 first tests, 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake pads (rear)

Failed on 106 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 46 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 247 first tests, 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the suspension sub-frame (front): 5.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension sub-frame (front)

Failed on 76 first tests5.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A suspension sub-frame insecurely attached to the chassis or axle is Major, and Dangerous when it is insecure and impairing directional stability. A sub-frame that is missing, likely to become detached, fractured or likely to fail is also Dangerous. Excessive damage or corrosion that seriously weakens it is Major.

Shock absorbers (front)

Failed on 164 first tests3.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 347 first tests, 5.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Coil spring (rear)

Failed on 212 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: engine oil leaks, 4.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Engine oil leaks

Failed on 43 first tests4.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Leaks of engine coolant, screen wash and the fluid used for selective catalyst reduction are not reasons for failure. Excessive leaking from the engine that is likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users is Major. Continuous leaking likely to pose a serious risk to road safety is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 422 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the individual sidelight or tail light (rear): 3.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual sidelight or tail light (rear)

Failed on 181 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Failed on 109 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 95 first tests, 3.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Steering

One fault: track rod end, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Track rod end

Failed on 62 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play is Major, and one worn to the extent there is a serious risk of detachment is graded Dangerous. A dust cover that is damaged but still keeps dirt out is Minor, and one missing or no longer keeping dirt out is Major. Testers must tell wear from a joint's built-in clearance or spring loading.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Steering rack play

Noted on 24 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Exhaust system (rear)

Noted on 261 first tests3.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Shock absorbers (rear)

Noted on 169 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
50in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
8in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
42in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 49.6% of 4,150 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 58.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 42 not fixed make the 50 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100200520092015Older carsNewer cars
4060801002009Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 51 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200446 in every 1001,166
200545 in every 1001,637
200647 in every 1002,751
200749 in every 1003,495
200847 in every 1003,983
2009 This car50 in every 1004,150
201056 in every 1007,921
201162 in every 10012,493
201265 in every 1007,868
201363 in every 1007,138
201467 in every 1007,152
201569 in every 1007,829
201671 in every 1006,223
201774 in every 1004,311

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2009 Meriva.

Of 2009 Meriva vehicles with under 57,000 miles, 63 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 106,000 miles or more, 41 in every 100 did.

Under 57,000821 tests
63
57,000–73,000775 tests
52
73,000–88,000 Typical car843 tests
48
88,000–106,000827 tests
45
106,000 and over819 tests
41

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 57,00073,000–88,000106,000 and over
Coil spring (rear)4.95.25.9
Individual sidelight or tail light (rear)2.45.25.0
Headlight aim2.24.46.1
Shock absorbers (front)1.94.95.4
Brake light1.93.84.9

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

22in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

57in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

13in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2009 Vauxhall Meriva follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Coil spring (rear), about 10 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 49.6% of 4,150 first MOTs on the 2009 Vauxhall Meriva passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 58.2%. Among 2,090 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Rigid brake pipes (front) appears more often than on similar cars (5.5% of those tests; 112 observed failures; about 5.6× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2009 Vauxhall Meriva at the first attempt were Coil spring (rear) (10.4%), Individual sidelight or tail light (rear) (8.8%) and Headlight aim (8.2%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Rigid brake pipes (front) (5.5% of those tests; 112 observed failures; about 5.6× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Rigid brake pipes (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (5.5% of those tests; 112 observed failures; about 5.6× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2009 Vauxhall Meriva include Rigid brake pipes (front), Suspension sub-frame (front), Flexible brake hoses (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2009 Vauxhall Meriva (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check