These MOT failure patterns show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age, and mileage.
Shares below are measured across the 2,436 failed first attempts in 2025 that the age-and-mileage comparison can be computed on.
Standout: Drive shafts — Joints (front) — 3.5% of this year's failed first attempts
Recorded on 86 of those tests. It tops the table on elevation — about 3.5× more often than on similar cars of the same age and mileage. That is what makes it unusual for its class, which is a different question from what is most likely to fail; the buying checklist ranks by that. The full ranked list is in the table below.
No patterns met the strongest callout thresholds on this page; showing the highest-lift rows that still cleared the display floors.
| Fault pattern | Location | Failures | vs similar cars | Share of fails | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Drive shafts — Joints (front)
Body, chassis, structure > Transmission > Drive shafts > Joints
|
Front | 86 | ×3.5 | 3.5% | Likely |
|
Service brake performance (rear)
Brakes > Brake performance > Service brake performance > Rbt > Service brake performance
|
Rear | 67 | ×3.1 | 2.8% | Likely |
|
Coil spring (rear)
Suspension > Springs > Coil springs > Coil spring
|
Rear | 101 | ×2.9 | 4.1% | Possible |
|
Stop lamp (rear)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Stop lamp
|
Rear | 63 | ×2.8 | 2.6% | Possible |
|
Seat belts — Condition (rear)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems > Seat belts > Condition
|
Rear | 59 | ×2.4 | 2.4% | Possible |
Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and about 2.0× more often than similar cars).