Toyota Verso 2010: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 60 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2010 Toyota Verso were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

A 2010 Toyota Verso passed first time about 3 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2009 and 2011 model years.

At a glance

How 2,712 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
60 in every 100
Did not pass first time
40 in every 1001,078 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
15 yearsabout 114,003 miles
First tests counted
2,712

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)19 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)11 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Headlight aim7 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2010 Toyota Verso vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Lamps and electrical

Three faults. The strongest is the individual sidelight or tail light (rear): 5.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,078 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Individual sidelight or tail light (rear)

Failed on 152 first tests5.4 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Horn

Failed on 62 first tests4.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A horn that does not work, or is likely to be confused with an emergency vehicle siren, is graded Major. Gongs, bells, sirens and anything with more than one tone, which includes a horn that alternates between its notes, are not allowed, except a gong, bell or siren on vehicles first used before a set date. Sound defects are Minor for named cases such as a bell or harsh sound, and Major under a general row.

Number plate lights (rear)

Failed on 72 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Registration plate lamps must light up the rear registration plate and operate at the same time as the position lamps. A missing or inoperative lamp is Major when the plate has only one lamp or all its lamps are not working, and Minor when the plate has several lamps or light sources and not all have failed. A lamp throwing direct white light to the rear is also Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

Two faults. The strongest is the rigid brake pipes (rear): 3.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Failed on 65 first tests3.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 177 first tests, 3.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake lever

Failed on 28 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism that is obviously worn is graded Minor. It is Major when worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release, and also when the ratchet is not holding correctly. A lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front): 3.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 53 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover is Major, and so is one that no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A cover that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. DVSA uses one wording for the dust cover on any suspension joint.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 116 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Headlight (front)

Noted on 51 first tests3.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame mounting area (rear)

Noted on 24 first tests3.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension mounting area (rear)

Noted on 45 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Chassis condition (rear)

Noted on 21 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Seat belt condition (rear)

Noted on 20 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
60in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
12in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
28in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 60.3% of 2,712 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 71.8%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 12 fixed and the 28 not fixed make the 40 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol1,500104,673 miles6260
Diesel1,204127,135 miles5859

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020102015Older carsNewer cars
4060801002010Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 61 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200962 in every 1001,697
2010 This car60 in every 1002,712
201165 in every 1003,543
201265 in every 1002,725
201370 in every 1003,016
201470 in every 1002,745
201575 in every 1002,987
201675 in every 1003,263
201780 in every 1002,163
201880 in every 100768

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2010 Verso.

Of 2010 Verso vehicles with under 84,000 miles, 69 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 148,000 miles or more, 56 in every 100 did.

Under 84,000547 tests
69
84,000–106,000544 tests
62
106,000–123,000 Typical car524 tests
57
123,000–148,000549 tests
57
148,000 and over547 tests
56

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol104,673 miles6260
Diesel127,135 miles5859

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 127,135 against 104,673). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 84,000106,000–123,000148,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)3.89.47.5
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)3.14.84.2
Headlight aim1.81.73.5
Number plate lights (rear)1.83.23.7
Rigid brake pipes (rear)1.82.73.1

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

24in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

51in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

8in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2010 Toyota Verso passed first time about 3 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2009 and 2011 model years. In 2025, 60.3% of 2,712 first MOTs on the 2010 Toyota Verso passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 71.8%. Among 1,078 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Individual sidelight or tail light (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (14.1% of those tests; 152 observed failures; about 5.4× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2010 Toyota Verso at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (19.1%), Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front) (10.8%) and Headlight aim (6.7%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Individual sidelight or tail light (rear) (14.1% of those tests; 152 observed failures; about 5.4× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Individual sidelight or tail light (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (14.1% of those tests; 152 observed failures; about 5.4× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2010 Toyota Verso include Individual sidelight or tail light (rear), Horn, Rigid brake pipes (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2010 Toyota Verso (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check