Model Reports 4 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

Toyota RAV4 2001: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 62 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2001 Toyota RAV4 were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Petrol emissions (with catalyst).

Summary

With 808 first tests, there are too few to say whether the 2001 Toyota RAV4 differs from the model years either side.

At a glance

How 808 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
62 in every 100
Did not pass first time
38 in every 100311 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
24 yearsabout 120,790 miles
First tests counted
808

What failed most often

  1. Petrol emissions (with catalyst)17 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2001 Toyota RAV4 vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

One fault: coil spring (rear), 3.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 311 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Coil spring (rear)

Failed on 25 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Noise, emissions and leaks

Two faults. The strongest is the petrol engine warning light: 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol engine warning light

Failed on 26 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) on a petrol engine is a Major failure when it is illuminated indicating a malfunction. The detail line DVSA gives for the same row also names an inoperative lamp. The test covers only certain petrol vehicles, depending on their age, size and fuel type.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 54 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail.

Exhaust system (rear)

Noted on 22 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Flexible brake hoses (rear)

Noted on 22 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
62in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
7in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
31in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 61.5% of 808 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 69.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 7 fixed and the 31 not fixed make the 38 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020012005201020152020Older carsNewer cars
406080100200120102020Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 60 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199856 in every 100459
199963 in every 100373
200060 in every 100389
2001 This car62 in every 100808
200260 in every 1001,544
200361 in every 1002,179
200461 in every 1002,857
200563 in every 1002,942
200657 in every 1001,936
200759 in every 1002,836
200859 in every 1002,869
200961 in every 1001,429
201069 in every 100427
201168 in every 100458
201271 in every 1001,489
201376 in every 1004,288
201479 in every 1004,492
201581 in every 1005,189
201682 in every 1007,354
201782 in every 1007,501
201883 in every 1007,041
201991 in every 1008,590
202091 in every 10011,168
202191 in every 10011,743
202294 in every 1009,602

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

With 808 first tests, there are too few to say whether the 2001 Toyota RAV4 differs from the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Petrol emissions (with catalyst), about 17 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 61.5% of 808 first MOTs on the 2001 Toyota RAV4 passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 69.4%. Among 311 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Coil spring (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (8.0% of those tests; 25 observed failures; about 3.3× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2001 Toyota RAV4 at the first attempt were Petrol emissions (with catalyst) (17.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Coil spring (rear) (8.0% of those tests; 25 observed failures; about 3.3× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Coil spring (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (8.0% of those tests; 25 observed failures; about 3.3× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2001 Toyota RAV4 include Coil spring (rear), Petrol engine warning light, Petrol emissions (with catalyst). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2001 Toyota RAV4 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check