Toyota Hilux 2016: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 69 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2016 Toyota Hilux were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Coil spring (front).

Summary

The 2016 Toyota Hilux follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 4,151 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
69 in every 100
Did not pass first time
31 in every 1001,296 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
9 yearsabout 89,326 miles
First tests counted
4,151

What failed most often

  1. Coil spring (front)14 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)11 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)11 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2016 Toyota Hilux vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the leaf spring (rear): 91 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,294 of 1,296 failed first attempts (99.8%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Leaf spring (rear)

Failed on 94 first tests91 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Modified spring anchor or shackle brackets with more mounting holes than the chassis are not a reason to reject leaf spring suspension, and neither is a missing bump stop rubber. A fractured main leaf is graded Dangerous. A spring that is fractured or seriously weakened is graded Major.

Suspension mounting area (rear)

Failed on 39 first tests69 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

The load bearing structure within a set distance of a sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting is a prescribed area. Major applies when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Dangerous applies when it is so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 23 first tests, 19 times as often as on similar cars.

Coil spring (front)

Failed on 179 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 22 first tests, 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

Six faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the rigid brake pipes (rear): 5.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Failed on 44 first tests5.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 74 first tests, 3.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake performance (roller test, front)

Failed on 59 first tests4.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 33 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake lever

Failed on 37 first tests4.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism that is obviously worn is graded Minor. It is Major when worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release, and also when the ratchet is not holding correctly. A lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

Handbrake performance (roller test)

Failed on 27 first tests3.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake that is inoperative on one side is Major. When tested on the road, the failure is the vehicle deviating excessively from a straight line. Vehicles whose parking brake was already tested as the secondary brake are not tested again for this.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 146 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.

Electronic stability control

Failed on 40 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

An ESC warning lamp is failed only when the tester is certain it indicates an ESC malfunction, because the lamp takes various forms and the owner's handbook may need checking. The system is also called ESP, VDC or DSC, among many other names. Every failure row is Major, covering the lamp, wheel speed sensors, wiring, other components and the switch.

Brake pads (front)

Failed on 113 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: rear fog light, 3.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Rear fog light

Failed on 44 first tests3.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing obligatory rear fog lamp, one that is not working, or one that does not emit a steady red light is graded Major. A rear fog lamp adversely affected by the operation of any other lamp is Major too. The manual allows it to go out when main beam is switched on or when dipped beam headlamps are switched off.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Chassis condition (rear)

Noted on 92 first tests72 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Shock absorbers (rear)

Noted on 97 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Transmission oil leaks

Noted on 23 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Noted on 43 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
69in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
6in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
25in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 68.8% of 4,151 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 74.8%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 6 fixed and the 25 not fixed make the 31 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002005201020162020Older carsNewer cars
4060801002000201020162020Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 70 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199663 in every 100348
199761 in every 100307
199855 in every 100537
199961 in every 100508
200058 in every 100483
200156 in every 100489
200258 in every 100742
200355 in every 100773
200453 in every 1001,121
200558 in every 100931
200658 in every 100820
200757 in every 1001,475
200856 in every 1001,645
200957 in every 1001,494
201056 in every 1002,040
201156 in every 1003,180
201258 in every 1003,400
201360 in every 1003,546
201463 in every 1004,427
201564 in every 1005,140
2016 This car69 in every 1004,151
201775 in every 1004,679
201876 in every 1005,088
201979 in every 1004,802
202080 in every 1004,709
202182 in every 1007,700
202285 in every 1005,889

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2016 Hilux.

Of 2016 Hilux vehicles with under 59,000 miles, 77 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 126,000 miles or more, 62 in every 100 did.

Under 59,000821 tests
77
59,000–79,000843 tests
74
79,000–99,000 Typical car811 tests
67
99,000–126,000839 tests
64
126,000 and over834 tests
62

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 59,00079,000–99,000126,000 and over
Coil spring (front)3.34.45.3
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)1.33.64.3
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)1.62.65.5
Brake pads (front)2.22.64.2
Number plate lights0.72.63.4

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

31in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

44in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

7in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2016 Toyota Hilux follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Coil spring (front), about 14 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 68.8% of 4,151 first MOTs on the 2016 Toyota Hilux passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 74.8%. Among 1,296 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Leaf spring (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (7.3% of those tests; 94 observed failures; about 91× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2016 Toyota Hilux at the first attempt were Coil spring (front) (13.8%), Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (11.3%) and Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (11.3%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Leaf spring (rear) (7.3% of those tests; 94 observed failures; about 91× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Leaf spring (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (7.3% of those tests; 94 observed failures; about 91× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2016 Toyota Hilux include Leaf spring (rear), Suspension mounting area (rear), Rigid brake pipes (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2016 Toyota Hilux (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check