Model Reports
8 min readUpdated 11 Sep 2026
DVSA open data · 5,771 tests analysed
Toyota Corolla 2004: reliability & common MOT faults
2,524 first-attempt MOT failures were recorded on the 2004 Toyota Corolla in 2025. The items recorded most often on them were Position lamp (front) and Headlamp (front). Figures are among first-attempt failed MOT tests, not among all tests.
Petrol Corollas passed first time 8.4 pp more often than diesel ones (56.8% of 5,428 vs 48.4% of 343).
First-attempt pass
56.3%
of 5,771 first tests (2025)
First tests
5,771
test year 2025
Failed first attempts
2,524
failed first-attempt tests
Most common fail
12.0%
Position lamp (front)
MOT pass rates
First-attempt and official-style rates among class 4 first tests of the year.
First-attempt pass
56.3%
of 5,771 first tests (2025)
Official-style pass
66.6%
incl. same-day PRS fixes
First tests
5,771
class 4 · first MOT of the year
Typical age 21.0 yrs · median mileage 102,401 mi
vs 2024:
+0.1 pp first-attempt
Note:
Class 4 cars · first MOT of the year per vehicle · P/PRS/F outcomes (2025 data).
PRS (fixed at the station the same day) counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate.
Raw outcomes for this cohort — not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix.
MOT doesn't test engine or gearbox internals.
Common faults
Failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars.
These MOT failure patterns show up more often on this registration year than on
similar cars of the same class, age, and mileage.
Shares below are measured across the 2,522 of
2,524 failed first attempts
(99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025 —
the subset the age-and-mileage comparison can be computed on.
Standout: Flexible brake hoses (rear) — 5.8% of this year's failed first attempts
Recorded on 146 of those tests. It tops the table on elevation — about 6.4× more often than on similar cars of the same age and mileage. That is what makes it unusual for its class, which is a different question from what is most likely to fail; the buying checklist ranks by that. The full ranked list is in the table below.
Fault pattern
Location
Failures
vs similar cars
Share of fails
Confidence
Flexible brake hoses (rear)
Brakes > Flexible brake hoses
Rear
146
×6.4
5.8%
Strong
Service brake performance (front)
Brakes > Brake performance > Service brake performance > Rbt > Service brake performance
Front
149
×2.8
5.9%
Possible
Headlamp (front)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Headlamps > Headlamp
Front
282
×2.1
11.2%
Possible
Visibility — Wipers (front)
Visibility > Wipers
Front
188
×2.0
7.5%
Possible
Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown
(at least 20 failures and about
2.0× more often than similar cars).
Note: Rates and comparisons are among first-attempt failed tests, not all MOTs. Patterns come from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer service bulletins, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Failures and advisories are listed separately.
Wear patterns
Usage and mileage effects that often track road use rather than model design.
These patterns look like wear or usage effects rather than model-specific design faults.
Tyres, brake friction material, and alignment-related defects often track mileage and road use.
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Headlamp aim > Headlamp aim not tested
Any
39
×2.0
1.5%
Wear
Note: These patterns are not treated as a model design fault in our common-faults ranking.
Advisories
Notes recorded at the test that appear more often than on similar cars.
Advisory notes recorded on failed first-attempt tests that appear more often than on similar cars.
Advisory pattern
Location
Notes
vs similar cars
Share
Confidence
Swivel pins and bushes (rear)
Suspension > Axles > Swivel pins and bushes
Rear
161
×6.6
6.4%
Elevated
Pins and bushes (rear)
Suspension > Sub-frames > Pins and bushes
Rear
49
×4.1
1.9%
Elevated
Suspension arm (front)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Suspension arm
Front
201
×3.8
8.0%
Elevated
Side repeaters (front)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Direction indicators > Flashing type > Side repeaters
Front
53
×3.6
2.1%
Elevated
Coil spring
Suspension > Springs > Coil springs > Coil spring
Any
102
×3.3
4.0%
Elevated
Service brake performance (front)
Brakes > Brake performance > Service brake performance > Plate brake tester > Service brake performance
Front
34
×3.1
1.3%
Likely
Service brake performance (front)
Brakes > Brake performance > Service brake performance > Rbt > Service brake performance
Front
140
×2.4
5.6%
Possible
Registration plates
Identification of the vehicle > Registration plates
Any
21
×2.3
0.8%
Elevated
Note: Advisories are not a fail rate — they flag issues noted at the test, often before they become failures.
If you are buying one
What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.
On this year, prefer the petrol. The diesel cars passed first time 8.4 pp less often, on 343 tests.
What to check on a 2004 Corolla
The items that failed 2004 Corollas most
often, as a share of the year's failed first attempts. This is what goes
wrong, not what is unusual — the table further up the page covers that.
Position lamp (front) — recorded on 12.0% of failed first attempts
Headlamp (front) — recorded on 11.2% of failed first attempts
Headlamp aim — recorded on 10.4% of failed first attempts
Rbt (sp) — recorded on 8.7% of failed first attempts
Visibility — Wipers (front) — recorded on 7.5% of failed first attempts
Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this
model line. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a
pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.
FAQs
Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.
Petrol Corollas passed first time 8.4 pp more often than diesel ones (56.8% of 5,428 vs 48.4% of 343). In 2025, 56.3% of 5,771 first MOTs on the 2004 Toyota Corolla passed first time (PRS — items fixed at the station the same day — counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 66.6%. Among 2,524 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Flexible brake hoses (rear) appears more often than on sim…
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that failed 2004 Toyota Corollas most often at the first attempt were Position lamp (front) (12.0%), Headlamp (front) (11.2%) and Headlamp aim (10.4%) — each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong on the car. It is a different question from which patterns are unusual for the class, which the common-faults table answers.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Flexible brake hoses (rear) (5.8% of those tests; 146 observed failures; about 6.4× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Flexible brake hoses (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (5.8% of those tests; 146 observed failures; about 6.4× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault — age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2004 Toyota Corolla include Flexible brake hoses (rear), Service brake performance (front), Headlamp (front). These patterns show up more often than on similar cars after we filter out sparse noise — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2004 Toyota Corolla (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.
About this data
How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.
These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars — not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.
20242025
What we include
UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.
Same-day repairs
PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.
How we compare
We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.
What this does not cover
MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics — this is not a full reliability score.
Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
Age and mileage matching reduces — but does not remove — differences in how cars were used and maintained.
We never invent pass rates, star scores, or ranks when those data marts are missing.