Toyota Corolla 2004: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 56 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2004 Toyota Corolla were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

The 2004 Toyota Corolla follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 5,771 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
56 in every 100
Did not pass first time
44 in every 1002,524 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
21 yearsabout 102,401 miles
First tests counted
5,771

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)12 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Headlight (front)11 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Headlight aim10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2004 Toyota Corolla vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Two faults and two wear patterns. The strongest is the flexible brake hoses (rear): 6.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,522 of 2,524 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Flexible brake hoses (rear)

Failed on 146 first tests6.4 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Testers reject a flexible brake hose for being excessively damaged or chafed only if it is severe enough to expose the reinforcement. Slight damage, chafing or twisting is graded Minor. A leak is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic braking system and Major on an air system, and a hose damaged and likely to fail is also Dangerous.

Brake pads (rear)

Failed on 147 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 164 first tests, 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake performance (roller test, front)

Failed on 149 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 140 first tests, 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake pads (front)

Failed on 110 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

One fault and one wear pattern. The strongest is the headlight (front): 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Headlight (front)

Failed on 282 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

On vehicles first used on or after a set date, a halogen headlamp unit converted to take HID or LED bulbs fails for light source and lamp not compatible, which is Major. A complete unit built with those light sources is not failed for that. The precise position of the lamps is not part of the inspection beyond a visual look to see that they sit at about the same height and distance from each side.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 168 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Headlight aim not tested

Failed on 39 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Headlamp aim recorded as not tested, or unable to be tested, is a Major failure. These results must only be used where it becomes apparent during the test that the item cannot be tested, and this could not have been identified before starting. The reason must be included in the additional information box.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Visibility

One fault: windscreen wipers (front), 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Windscreen wipers (front)

Failed on 188 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Only a clearly damaged or worn windscreen wiper needs to be rejected. A wiper that is missing or not working is graded Major, and so is a blade that is missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen. A defective blade is graded Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Swivel pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 161 first tests6.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 49 first tests4.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm (front)

Noted on 201 first tests3.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Side repeater indicators (front)

Noted on 53 first tests3.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Coil spring

Noted on 102 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake performance (plate test, front)

Noted on 34 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Number plates

Noted on 21 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
56in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
11in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
33in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 56.3% of 5,771 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 66.6%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 11 fixed and the 33 not fixed make the 44 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as tested
Petrol5,428100,825 miles57
Diesel343128,304 miles48

Figures are in every 100 first tests.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002004Older carsNewer cars
40608010020002004Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199759 in every 100384
199856 in every 100732
199960 in every 100904
200062 in every 100867
200162 in every 1001,613
200260 in every 1002,840
200357 in every 1004,322
2004 This car56 in every 1005,771
200559 in every 1009,163
200660 in every 10010,479
200760 in every 1003,658
200859 in every 1002,731
200959 in every 1001,092

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2004 Corolla.

Of 2004 Corolla vehicles with under 71,000 miles, 70 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 135,000 miles or more, 46 in every 100 did.

Under 71,0001,152 tests
70
71,000–93,0001,159 tests
60
93,000–113,000 Typical car1,174 tests
54
113,000–135,0001,107 tests
52
135,000 and over1,175 tests
46

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 71,00093,000–113,000135,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)1.54.98.7
Headlight (front)3.04.97.1
Headlight aim1.64.85.6
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)1.32.67.9
Windscreen wipers (front)3.23.33.8

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

20in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

59in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

10in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2004 Toyota Corolla follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Individual sidelight or tail light (front), about 12 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 56.3% of 5,771 first MOTs on the 2004 Toyota Corolla passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 66.6%. Among 2,524 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Flexible brake hoses (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (5.8% of those tests; 146 observed failures; about 6.4× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2004 Toyota Corolla at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (12.0%), Headlight (front) (11.2%) and Headlight aim (10.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Flexible brake hoses (rear) (5.8% of those tests; 146 observed failures; about 6.4× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Flexible brake hoses (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (5.8% of those tests; 146 observed failures; about 6.4× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2004 Toyota Corolla include Flexible brake hoses (rear), Brake performance (roller test, front), Headlight (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2004 Toyota Corolla (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check