Model Reports 4 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

Toyota Aygo 2011: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 60 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2011 Toyota Aygo were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

The 2011 Toyota Aygo follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 12,025 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
60 in every 100
Did not pass first time
40 in every 1004,789 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
14 yearsabout 72,829 miles
First tests counted
12,025

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)16 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Brake performance (roller test, rear)11 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Suspension mounting area (rear)9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2011 Toyota Aygo vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: hazard warning switch, 14 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 4,786 of 4,789 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Hazard warning switch

Failed on 189 first tests14 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A hazard warning switch that is inoperative is Major, while one that is faulty or insecure is Minor. The lamps must work from one switch only, with the engine or ignition switch both on and off.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

Five faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar linkage pins and bushes (front): 14 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar linkage pins and bushes (front)

Failed on 131 first tests14 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Excessive wear in an anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush is Major. If the pin or bush is likely to become detached, it is graded Dangerous. The wording is DVSA's general one for a suspension pin, bush or joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 566 first tests, 29 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension mounting area (rear)

Failed on 443 first tests9.8 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

The load bearing structure within a set distance of a sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting is a prescribed area. Major applies when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Dangerous applies when it is so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 178 first tests, 4.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Wheel bearings (front)

Failed on 202 first tests4.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Excessive play in a wheel bearing, or a bearing that is excessively rough, is Major. Play so excessive that the bearing is likely to break up or directional control is impaired is Dangerous, and so is a bearing so rough that it is likely to overheat or break up.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 81 first tests, 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Macpherson strut (front)

Failed on 120 first tests4.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Many MacPherson strut top bushes are designed to have significant lateral play when the suspension hangs free, so a top bush is rejected only when the play comes from wear or maladjustment. A top bush or bearing with excessive wear or free play is Major. Rubber or synthetic bushes are rejected only for serious deterioration of the bonding or flexible material.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 170 first tests, 4.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension sub-frame (front)

Failed on 106 first tests3.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A suspension sub-frame insecurely attached to the chassis or axle is Major, and Dangerous when it is insecure and impairing directional stability. A sub-frame that is missing, likely to become detached, fractured or likely to fail is also Dangerous. Excessive damage or corrosion that seriously weakens it is Major.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 336 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

One fault: chassis condition (rear), 8.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Chassis condition (rear)

Failed on 97 first tests8.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A main load-bearing structural member that is fractured, deformed, modified or inadequately repaired is Major when structural rigidity is significantly reduced, and Dangerous where steering or braking is likely to be adversely affected. Corrosion of the body, cab or chassis at a mounting point is Dangerous where overall security or stability is impaired.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 38 first tests, 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

Three faults. The strongest is the brake performance (plate test, rear): 5.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake performance (plate test, rear)

Failed on 120 first tests5.2 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Braking effort that is inadequate at a wheel, a brake grabbing severely and a binding brake are among the Major failures. A wheel with no recorded effort is graded Dangerous. If a vehicle fails any aspect of the plate test, the check should be repeated to confirm the result.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 58 first tests, 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 505 first tests4.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 236 first tests, 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Failed on 222 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 732 first tests, 3.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front)

Noted on 106 first tests8.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Other suspension component (front)

Noted on 20 first tests3.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Individual direction indicators (front)

Noted on 129 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Headlight (front)

Noted on 120 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
60in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
9in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
31in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 60.2% of 12,025 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 68.8%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 9 fixed and the 31 not fixed make the 40 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201120152020Older carsNewer cars
40608010020112020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 63 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200548 in every 1001,113
200651 in every 1006,284
200753 in every 1007,852
200853 in every 1009,783
200958 in every 10011,437
201059 in every 10010,781
2011 This car60 in every 10012,025
201263 in every 10013,964
201368 in every 10014,506
201474 in every 10018,639
201580 in every 10022,441
201682 in every 10021,503
201784 in every 10020,802
201885 in every 10021,274
201986 in every 10021,387
202087 in every 10016,051
202189 in every 10016,509
202293 in every 1001,396

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2011 Aygo.

Of 2011 Aygo vehicles with under 49,000 miles, 73 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 99,000 miles or more, 50 in every 100 did.

Under 49,0002,424 tests
73
49,000–66,0002,450 tests
65
66,000–80,000 Typical car2,268 tests
59
80,000–99,0002,522 tests
54
99,000 and over2,357 tests
50

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 49,00066,000–80,00099,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)1.66.710.4
Brake performance (roller test, rear)3.74.44.6
Suspension mounting area (rear)1.74.35.0
Headlight aim2.32.54.2
Petrol emissions (with catalyst)1.12.05.9

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.

When a car fails

29in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

46in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

8in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2011 Toyota Aygo follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Individual sidelight or tail light (front), about 16 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 60.2% of 12,025 first MOTs on the 2011 Toyota Aygo passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 68.8%. Among 4,789 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Hazard warning switch appears more often than on similar cars (3.9% of those tests; 189 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2011 Toyota Aygo at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (16.1%), Brake performance (roller test, rear) (10.6%) and Suspension mounting area (rear) (9.3%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Hazard warning switch (3.9% of those tests; 189 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Hazard warning switch shows up more often than on similar cars (3.9% of those tests; 189 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2011 Toyota Aygo include Hazard warning switch, Anti-roll bar linkage pins and bushes (front), Suspension mounting area (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2011 Toyota Aygo (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check