Toyota Avensis 2005: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 57 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2005 Toyota Avensis were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

The 2005 Toyota Avensis follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 2,786 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
57 in every 100
Did not pass first time
43 in every 1001,207 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
20 yearsabout 118,401 miles
First tests counted
2,786

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)19 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Coil spring (front)9 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Headlight aim9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2005 Toyota Avensis vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Four faults. The strongest is the suspension arm (rear): 7.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,206 of 1,207 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension arm (rear)

Failed on 48 first tests7.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a suspension arm. A component that is fractured, missing or likely to fail is graded Dangerous, and one excessively damaged or corroded is Major. On some vehicles, some highly stressed parts are thin pressed steel, and many of those have hollow box sections or up-facing areas that can collect road dirt and salt, so they get special attention.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 126 first tests, 3.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (rear)

Failed on 26 first tests6.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

An anti-roll bar pin or bush that is excessively worn is Major, and one likely to become detached is graded Dangerous. The wording is DVSA's general rule for a suspension pin, bush or joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 22 first tests, 2.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Coil spring (front)

Failed on 108 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Wheel bearings (front)

Failed on 55 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Excessive play in a wheel bearing, or a bearing that is excessively rough, is Major. Play so excessive that the bearing is likely to break up or directional control is impaired is Dangerous, and so is a bearing so rough that it is likely to overheat or break up.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: individual sidelight or tail light (rear), 3.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual sidelight or tail light (rear)

Failed on 113 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One fault: electronic stability control, 2.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Electronic stability control

Failed on 29 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

An ESC warning lamp is failed only when the tester is certain it indicates an ESC malfunction, because the lamp takes various forms and the owner's handbook may need checking. The system is also called ESP, VDC or DSC, among many other names. Every failure row is Major, covering the lamp, wheel speed sensors, wiring, other components and the switch.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Suspension arm (front)

Noted on 140 first tests5.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar (rear)

Noted on 31 first tests4.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Other suspension component (rear)

Noted on 27 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame mounting area (rear)

Noted on 33 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake light

Noted on 27 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame (rear)

Noted on 181 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
57in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
11in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
32in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 56.7% of 2,786 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 67.8%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 11 fixed and the 32 not fixed make the 43 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol2,175112,148 miles5755
Diesel609147,548 miles5660

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002000200520102015Older carsNewer cars
406080100200020052010Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200060 in every 100338
200159 in every 100467
200260 in every 100661
200355 in every 1001,505
200458 in every 1002,014
2005 This car57 in every 1002,786
200657 in every 1003,614
200758 in every 1004,056
200857 in every 1004,274
200962 in every 1004,514
201064 in every 1004,842
201165 in every 1003,942
201269 in every 1004,291
201370 in every 1002,810
201473 in every 1002,681
201576 in every 1002,819
201680 in every 1003,203
201781 in every 1002,212
201881 in every 1001,022

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2005 Avensis.

Of 2005 Avensis vehicles with under 85,000 miles, 67 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 157,000 miles or more, 46 in every 100 did.

Under 85,000550 tests
67
85,000–108,000562 tests
62
108,000–129,000 Typical car564 tests
56
129,000–157,000560 tests
53
157,000 and over549 tests
46

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol112,148 miles5755
Diesel147,548 miles5760

Figures are in every 100 first tests. At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 85,000108,000–129,000157,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)3.88.511.7
Coil spring (front)2.23.54.4
Headlight aim1.55.04.9
Brake light2.04.13.1
Petrol engine warning light2.44.64.4

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

22in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

56in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

10in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2005 Toyota Avensis follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Individual sidelight or tail light (front), about 19 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 56.7% of 2,786 first MOTs on the 2005 Toyota Avensis passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 67.8%. Among 1,207 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension arm (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (4.0% of those tests; 48 observed failures; about 7.4× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2005 Toyota Avensis at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (18.7%), Coil spring (front) (9.0%) and Headlight aim (8.6%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension arm (rear) (4.0% of those tests; 48 observed failures; about 7.4× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension arm (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (4.0% of those tests; 48 observed failures; about 7.4× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2005 Toyota Avensis include Suspension arm (rear), Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (rear), Individual sidelight or tail light (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2005 Toyota Avensis (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check