Toyota Auris 2012: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 66 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2012 Toyota Auris were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

A 2012 Toyota Auris passed first time about 4 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2011 and 2013 model years.

At a glance

How 8,069 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
66 in every 100
Did not pass first time
34 in every 1002,760 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
13 yearsabout 86,514 miles
First tests counted
8,069

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)19 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Horn7 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Number plate lights7 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2012 Toyota Auris vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Lamps and electrical

Three faults. The strongest is the horn: 6.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,758 of 2,760 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Horn

Failed on 200 first tests6.7 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A horn that does not work, or is likely to be confused with an emergency vehicle siren, is graded Major. Gongs, bells, sirens and anything with more than one tone, which includes a horn that alternates between its notes, are not allowed, except a gong, bell or siren on vehicles first used before a set date. Sound defects are Minor for named cases such as a bell or harsh sound, and Major under a general row.

Individual sidelight or tail light (rear)

Failed on 258 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Side repeater indicators (front)

Failed on 173 first tests3.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Sequential or dynamic direction indicators are not a reason to fail. Where a side repeater is required, it is allowed to be part of the front direction indicator if it has a marked wraparound lens, or an amber light coming through the front lens when viewed from a set distance to the side of the rear bumper. A lens defect with no effect on the emitted light is Minor, and one that adversely affects the light is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One fault and one wear pattern. The strongest is the rigid brake pipes (rear): 3.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Failed on 126 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 446 first tests, 4.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 74 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

One fault: anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front), 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 97 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover is Major, and so is one that no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A cover that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. DVSA uses one wording for the dust cover on any suspension joint.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Chassis condition (rear)

Noted on 43 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Steering rack play

Noted on 33 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Noted on 250 first tests3.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Vehicle structure condition

Noted on 26 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension mounting area (rear)

Noted on 54 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Macpherson strut (front)

Noted on 54 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Exhaust system (rear)

Noted on 102 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
66in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
9in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
25in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 65.8% of 8,069 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 75.3%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 9 fixed and the 25 not fixed make the 34 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

By fuel type

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol4,49278,985 miles6766
Hybrid2,17496,134 miles6465
Electric59595,155 miles6566

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020122015Older carsNewer cars
4060801002012Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 67 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200758 in every 1008,906
200859 in every 1009,819
200962 in every 1009,720
201063 in every 1008,943
201163 in every 1008,904
2012 This car66 in every 1008,069
201375 in every 10013,056
201476 in every 10015,606
201577 in every 10015,711
201679 in every 10014,103
201780 in every 10012,550
201880 in every 10011,953
201979 in every 1001,013

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2012 Auris.

Of 2012 Auris vehicles with under 59,000 miles, 77 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 119,000 miles or more, 60 in every 100 did.

Under 59,0001,586 tests
77
59,000–78,0001,636 tests
68
78,000–95,000 Typical car1,638 tests
64
95,000–119,0001,585 tests
60
119,000 and over1,619 tests
60

Which fuel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol78,985 miles6766
Hybrid96,134 miles6465

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because hybrid cars have done more miles (typically 96,134 against 78,985). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 59,00078,000–95,000119,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)1.17.110.7
Horn1.52.73.3
Number plate lights0.92.92.8
Tyre condition (front)2.32.12.1
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)1.21.93.8

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

33in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

41in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

7in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2012 Toyota Auris passed first time about 4 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2011 and 2013 model years. In 2025, 65.8% of 8,069 first MOTs on the 2012 Toyota Auris passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 75.3%. Among 2,760 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Horn appears more often than on similar cars (7.3% of those tests; 200 observed failures; about 6.7× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2012 Toyota Auris at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (18.8%), Horn (7.3%) and Number plate lights (6.8%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Horn (7.3% of those tests; 200 observed failures; about 6.7× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Horn shows up more often than on similar cars (7.3% of those tests; 200 observed failures; about 6.7× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2012 Toyota Auris include Horn, Individual sidelight or tail light (rear), Side repeater indicators (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2012 Toyota Auris (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check