Suzuki Splash 2012: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 63 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2012 Suzuki Splash were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Suspension arm ball joint (front).

Summary

The 2012 Suzuki Splash follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 3,467 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
63 in every 100
Did not pass first time
37 in every 1001,270 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
13 yearsabout 59,006 miles
First tests counted
3,467

What failed most often

  1. Suspension arm ball joint (front)17 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Coil spring (front)15 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2012 Suzuki Splash vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Eight faults. The strongest is the brake hand lever: 6.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,269 of 1,270 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Brake hand lever

Failed on 34 first tests6.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A brake lever is failed for insufficient reserve only if it is touching the floor or handlebar. On motorcycle derived systems the lever may touch the handlebar, so the extent of reserve travel is assessed during the brake test. A lever not releasing correctly is Minor, and Major where the functionality of the brakes is affected.

Handbrake lever

Failed on 39 first tests4.9 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism that is obviously worn is graded Minor. It is Major when worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release, and also when the ratchet is not holding correctly. A lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

Brake performance (plate test, rear)

Failed on 28 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Braking effort that is inadequate at a wheel, a brake grabbing severely and a binding brake are among the Major failures. A wheel with no recorded effort is graded Dangerous. If a vehicle fails any aspect of the plate test, the check should be repeated to confirm the result.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Failed on 82 first tests4.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 240 first tests, 4.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Failed on 44 first tests4.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 138 first tests, 4.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 102 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 56 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 127 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.

Brake imbalance across an axle (roller test, efficiency check, rear)

Failed on 26 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A wheel giving less than a set share of the maximum effort from the other wheel on the same axle is Major. On a steered axle, less than half is graded Dangerous. Testers disregard an imbalance if the lower effort is the result of a locked wheel, or if the higher effort from a wheel is at or below a low set figure.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: individual direction indicators (rear), 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Failed on 80 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 50 first tests, 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

One fault: suspension arm ball joint (front), 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm ball joint (front)

Failed on 222 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension arm ball joint is failed under the general suspension pin, bush or joint wording. Excessively worn is Major, and likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Brake pedal

Noted on 20 first tests6.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Macpherson strut pins and bushes (front)

Noted on 43 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Flexible brake hoses (rear)

Noted on 69 first tests4.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)

Noted on 207 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
63in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
7in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
30in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 63.4% of 3,467 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 70.1%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 7 fixed and the 30 not fixed make the 37 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002008200920102011201220132014Older carsNewer cars
4060801002012Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 65 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200852 in every 1001,572
200953 in every 1002,297
201055 in every 1001,332
201157 in every 1001,414
2012 This car63 in every 1003,467
201365 in every 1003,278
201470 in every 1002,952

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2012 Splash.

Of 2012 Splash vehicles with under 38,000 miles, 77 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 85,000 miles or more, 52 in every 100 did.

Under 38,000711 tests
77
38,000–52,000667 tests
70
52,000–67,000 Typical car707 tests
63
67,000–85,000672 tests
56
85,000 and over709 tests
52

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 38,00052,000–67,00085,000 and over
Suspension arm ball joint (front)2.08.18.6
Coil spring (front)4.44.55.1
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)0.02.49.7
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)1.43.46.5
Brake performance (roller test, rear)3.03.43.1

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

33in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

41in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

6in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2012 Suzuki Splash follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Suspension arm ball joint (front), about 17 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 63.4% of 3,467 first MOTs on the 2012 Suzuki Splash passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 70.1%. Among 1,270 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Brake hand lever appears more often than on similar cars (2.7% of those tests; 34 observed failures; about 6.7× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2012 Suzuki Splash at the first attempt were Suspension arm ball joint (front) (17.5%), Coil spring (front) (14.7%) and Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (10.5%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Brake hand lever (2.7% of those tests; 34 observed failures; about 6.7× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Brake hand lever shows up more often than on similar cars (2.7% of those tests; 34 observed failures; about 6.7× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2012 Suzuki Splash include Brake hand lever, Handbrake lever, Brake performance (plate test, rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2012 Suzuki Splash (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check