Smart (MCC) Fortwo 2008: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 62 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2008 Smart (MCC) Fortwo were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

The 2008 Smart (MCC) Fortwo follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 4,177 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
62 in every 100
Did not pass first time
38 in every 1001,583 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
17 yearsabout 69,642 miles
First tests counted
4,177

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)14 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Petrol engine warning light12 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Brake performance (roller test, rear)9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2008 Smart (MCC) Fortwo vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Body and structure

One fault: fuel cap, 19 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,581 of 1,583 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Fuel cap

Failed on 120 first tests19 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A missing or ineffective fuel filler cap is Major, as is a plain fuel system leak, while a fuel system leaking excessively or a risk of fire has its own, separate wording. A fuel tank with a hole, or a split filler neck, from which fuel can leak must be failed for leaking even if the hole or split is above the fuel line.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

One fault: suspension arm (front), 7.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm (front)

Failed on 32 first tests7.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a suspension arm. A component that is fractured, missing or likely to fail is graded Dangerous, and one excessively damaged or corroded is Major. On some vehicles, some highly stressed parts are thin pressed steel, and many of those have hollow box sections or up-facing areas that can collect road dirt and salt, so they get special attention.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

Three faults. The strongest is the brake performance (plate test, rear): 3.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake performance (plate test, rear)

Failed on 33 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Braking effort that is inadequate at a wheel, a brake grabbing severely and a binding brake are among the Major failures. A wheel with no recorded effort is graded Dangerous. If a vehicle fails any aspect of the plate test, the check should be repeated to confirm the result.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 22 first tests, 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 139 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Failed on 88 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 281 first tests, 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

One fault and one wear pattern. The strongest is the headlight aim not tested (front): 3.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Headlight aim not tested (front)

Failed on 22 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Headlamp aim recorded as not tested, or unable to be tested, is a Major failure. These results must only be used where it becomes apparent during the test that the item cannot be tested, and this could not have been identified before starting. The reason must be included in the additional information box.

Horn

Failed on 64 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A horn that does not work, or is likely to be confused with an emergency vehicle siren, is graded Major. Gongs, bells, sirens and anything with more than one tone, which includes a horn that alternates between its notes, are not allowed, except a gong, bell or siren on vehicles first used before a set date. Sound defects are Minor for named cases such as a bell or harsh sound, and Major under a general row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: petrol engine warning light, 2.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol engine warning light

Failed on 185 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) on a petrol engine is a Major failure when it is illuminated indicating a malfunction. The detail line DVSA gives for the same row also names an inoperative lamp. The test covers only certain petrol vehicles, depending on their age, size and fuel type.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Side repeater indicators

Noted on 21 first tests7.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front)

Noted on 30 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Macpherson strut pins and bushes (front)

Noted on 45 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
62in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
9in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
29in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 62.1% of 4,177 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 71.1%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 9 fixed and the 29 not fixed make the 38 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005200820152020Older carsNewer cars
40608010020082020Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200462 in every 100515
200558 in every 100615
200657 in every 100809
200760 in every 1001,922
2008 This car62 in every 1004,177
200963 in every 1005,126
201065 in every 1004,870
201168 in every 1003,561
201271 in every 1004,302
201371 in every 1004,256
201475 in every 1003,581
201576 in every 1002,115
201677 in every 1005,484
201780 in every 1004,597
201883 in every 1003,261
201986 in every 1001,802
202090 in every 100534
202191 in every 100728
202294 in every 100481

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2008 Fortwo.

Of 2008 Fortwo vehicles with under 47,000 miles, 68 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 93,000 miles or more, 57 in every 100 did.

Under 47,000814 tests
68
47,000–63,000874 tests
65
63,000–77,000 Typical car810 tests
62
77,000–93,000826 tests
59
93,000 and over850 tests
57

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 47,00063,000–77,00093,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)1.56.08.2
Petrol engine warning light2.73.56.7
Brake performance (roller test, rear)4.33.22.2
Coil spring (front)2.73.82.0
Brake light3.22.73.5

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

29in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

44in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

5in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2008 Smart (MCC) Fortwo follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Individual sidelight or tail light (front), about 14 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 62.1% of 4,177 first MOTs on the 2008 Smart (MCC) Fortwo passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 71.1%. Among 1,583 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Fuel cap appears more often than on similar cars (7.6% of those tests; 120 observed failures; about 19× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2008 Smart (MCC) Fortwo at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (13.8%), Petrol engine warning light (11.7%) and Brake performance (roller test, rear) (8.8%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Fuel cap (7.6% of those tests; 120 observed failures; about 19× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Fuel cap shows up more often than on similar cars (7.6% of those tests; 120 observed failures; about 19× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2008 Smart (MCC) Fortwo include Fuel cap, Suspension arm (front), Brake performance (plate test, rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2008 Smart (MCC) Fortwo (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check