Skoda Octavia 2009: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 59 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2009 Skoda Octavia were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

The 2009 Skoda Octavia follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 5,581 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
59 in every 100
Did not pass first time
41 in every 1002,267 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
16 yearsabout 129,348 miles
First tests counted
5,581

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)10 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Coil spring (front)10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2009 Skoda Octavia vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the side repeater indicators (front): 4.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,265 of 2,267 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Side repeater indicators (front)

Failed on 179 first tests4.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Sequential or dynamic direction indicators are not a reason to fail. Where a side repeater is required, it is allowed to be part of the front direction indicator if it has a marked wraparound lens, or an amber light coming through the front lens when viewed from a set distance to the side of the rear bumper. A lens defect with no effect on the emitted light is Minor, and one that adversely affects the light is Major.

Individual direction indicators (front)

Failed on 48 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 41 first tests, 2.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/07/2008), 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/07/2008)

Failed on 179 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front): 2.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 158 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Whether a suspension arm ball joint dust cover still keeps dirt out decides its grade. Severely deteriorated is Minor, while missing, or no longer preventing the ingress of dirt, is Major.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 205 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Seat belt condition (rear)

Noted on 60 first tests3.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar (rear)

Noted on 38 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm (rear)

Noted on 205 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Noted on 95 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame (rear)

Noted on 429 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Shock absorbers (front)

Noted on 236 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear)

Noted on 50 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
59in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
6in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
35in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 59.4% of 5,581 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 65.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 6 fixed and the 35 not fixed make the 41 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel4,233139,008 miles5859
Petrol1,347101,226 miles6563

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005200920152020Older carsNewer cars
40608010020092020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 60 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200158 in every 100439
200263 in every 100665
200357 in every 1001,033
200458 in every 1001,315
200555 in every 1002,192
200655 in every 1003,683
200755 in every 1004,542
200857 in every 1004,443
2009 This car59 in every 1005,581
201062 in every 1007,901
201164 in every 1009,733
201264 in every 1009,485
201371 in every 1009,814
201476 in every 10015,498
201577 in every 10017,600
201680 in every 10018,877
201782 in every 10017,153
201883 in every 10015,441
201983 in every 10018,357
202086 in every 10011,334
202188 in every 1008,884
202289 in every 1005,796

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2009 Octavia.

Of 2009 Octavia vehicles with under 91,000 miles, 68 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 170,000 miles or more, 55 in every 100 did.

Under 91,0001,100 tests
68
91,000–118,0001,139 tests
61
118,000–141,000 Typical car1,096 tests
57
141,000–170,0001,140 tests
56
170,000 and over1,104 tests
55

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel139,008 miles5859
Petrol101,226 miles6563

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 139,008 against 101,226). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 91,000118,000–141,000170,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)1.84.66.1
Coil spring (front)3.64.25.3
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)4.53.82.4
Tyre condition (rear)2.43.64.4
Drive shaft joints and boots (front)1.54.14.3

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

27in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

47in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

10in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2009 Skoda Octavia follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Individual sidelight or tail light (front), about 10 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 59.4% of 5,581 first MOTs on the 2009 Skoda Octavia passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 65.2%. Among 2,267 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Side repeater indicators (front) appears more often than on similar cars (7.9% of those tests; 179 observed failures; about 4.5× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2009 Skoda Octavia at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (10.4%), Coil spring (front) (10.2%) and Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front) (9.1%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Side repeater indicators (front) (7.9% of those tests; 179 observed failures; about 4.5× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Side repeater indicators (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (7.9% of those tests; 179 observed failures; about 4.5× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2009 Skoda Octavia include Side repeater indicators (front), Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front), Individual direction indicators (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2009 Skoda Octavia (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check