Skoda Citigo 2017: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 80 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2017 Skoda Citigo were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Suspension arm pins and bushes (front).

Summary

The 2017 Skoda Citigo follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 6,116 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
80 in every 100
Did not pass first time
20 in every 1001,224 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
8 yearsabout 40,378 miles
First tests counted
6,116

What failed most often

  1. Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)15 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Tyre condition (rear)8 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Headlight aim7 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2017 Skoda Citigo vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Body and structure

One fault: fuel cap, 27 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,223 of 1,224 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Fuel cap

Failed on 50 first tests27 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing or ineffective fuel filler cap is Major, as is a plain fuel system leak, while a fuel system leaking excessively or a risk of fire has its own, separate wording. A fuel tank with a hole, or a split filler neck, from which fuel can leak must be failed for leaking even if the hole or split is above the fuel line.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One fault: brake performance (roller test, rear), 4.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 73 first tests4.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 35 first tests, 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

One fault: suspension arm pins and bushes (front), 3.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)

Failed on 181 first tests3.9 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 144 first tests, 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the headlight (front): 3.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Headlight (front)

Failed on 89 first tests3.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

On vehicles first used on or after a set date, a halogen headlamp unit converted to take HID or LED bulbs fails for light source and lamp not compatible, which is Major. A complete unit built with those light sources is not failed for that. The precise position of the lamps is not part of the inspection beyond a visual look to see that they sit at about the same height and distance from each side.

Number plate lights (rear)

Failed on 51 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Registration plate lamps must light up the rear registration plate and operate at the same time as the position lamps. A missing or inoperative lamp is Major when the plate has only one lamp or all its lamps are not working, and Minor when the plate has several lamps or light sources and not all have failed. A lamp throwing direct white light to the rear is also Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: petrol emissions (with catalyst), 2.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 60 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
80in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
5in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
15in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 80.0% of 6,116 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 85.3%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 5 fixed and the 15 not fixed make the 20 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020122013201420152016201720182019Older carsNewer cars
4060801002017Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 82 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
201275 in every 1003,609
201376 in every 1006,722
201475 in every 1008,867
201577 in every 1007,810
201674 in every 1007,595
2017 This car80 in every 1006,116
201883 in every 1005,215
201988 in every 1004,402

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2017 Citigo.

Of 2017 Citigo vehicles with under 24,000 miles, 88 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 60,000 miles or more, 67 in every 100 did.

Under 24,0001,267 tests
88
24,000–35,0001,217 tests
83
35,000–46,000 Typical car1,173 tests
83
46,000–60,0001,216 tests
78
60,000 and over1,241 tests
67

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 24,00035,000–46,00060,000 and over
Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)1.83.24.7
Tyre condition (rear)1.81.41.8
Headlight aim0.51.03.1
Headlight0.21.92.5
Brake performance (roller test, rear)0.21.32.7

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

49in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

24in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

4in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2017 Skoda Citigo follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Suspension arm pins and bushes (front), about 15 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 80.0% of 6,116 first MOTs on the 2017 Skoda Citigo passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 85.3%. Among 1,224 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Fuel cap appears more often than on similar cars (4.1% of those tests; 50 observed failures; about 27× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2017 Skoda Citigo at the first attempt were Suspension arm pins and bushes (front) (14.8%), Tyre condition (rear) (7.9%) and Headlight aim (7.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Fuel cap (4.1% of those tests; 50 observed failures; about 27× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Fuel cap shows up more often than on similar cars (4.1% of those tests; 50 observed failures; about 27× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2017 Skoda Citigo include Fuel cap, Brake performance (roller test, rear), Suspension arm pins and bushes (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2017 Skoda Citigo (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check