Skoda Citigo 2012: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 75 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2012 Skoda Citigo were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Brake performance (roller test, rear).

Summary

The 2012 Skoda Citigo follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 3,609 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
75 in every 100
Did not pass first time
25 in every 100901 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
13 yearsabout 66,270 miles
First tests counted
3,609

What failed most often

  1. Brake performance (roller test, rear)10 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Headlight aim7 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)7 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2012 Skoda Citigo vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Body and structure

One fault: fuel cap, 19 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 900 of 901 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Fuel cap

Failed on 58 first tests19 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing or ineffective fuel filler cap is Major, as is a plain fuel system leak, while a fuel system leaking excessively or a risk of fire has its own, separate wording. A fuel tank with a hole, or a split filler neck, from which fuel can leak must be failed for leaking even if the hole or split is above the fuel line.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

Four faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the brake imbalance across an axle (roller test, efficiency check, rear): 5.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake imbalance across an axle (roller test, efficiency check, rear)

Failed on 39 first tests5.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A wheel giving less than a set share of the maximum effort from the other wheel on the same axle is Major. On a steered axle, less than half is graded Dangerous. Testers disregard an imbalance if the lower effort is the result of a locked wheel, or if the higher effort from a wheel is at or below a low set figure.

Brake performance (plate test, rear)

Failed on 20 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Braking effort that is inadequate at a wheel, a brake grabbing severely and a binding brake are among the Major failures. A wheel with no recorded effort is graded Dangerous. If a vehicle fails any aspect of the plate test, the check should be repeated to confirm the result.

Brake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 94 first tests4.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 47 first tests, 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake lever

Failed on 26 first tests4.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism that is obviously worn is graded Minor. It is Major when worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release, and also when the ratchet is not holding correctly. A lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

Brake discs (front)

Failed on 33 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: petrol emissions (with catalyst), 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 54 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Exhaust system (front)

Noted on 36 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
75in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
5in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
20in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 75.0% of 3,609 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 80.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 5 fixed and the 20 not fixed make the 25 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020122013201420152016201720182019Newer cars
4060801002012Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
2012 This car75 in every 1003,609
201376 in every 1006,722
201475 in every 1008,867
201577 in every 1007,810
201674 in every 1007,595
201780 in every 1006,116
201883 in every 1005,215
201988 in every 1004,402

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2012 Citigo.

Of 2012 Citigo vehicles with under 43,000 miles, 86 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 96,000 miles or more, 64 in every 100 did.

Under 43,000733 tests
86
43,000–59,000728 tests
78
59,000–75,000 Typical car700 tests
76
75,000–96,000723 tests
71
96,000 and over723 tests
64

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 43,00059,000–75,00096,000 and over
Brake performance (roller test, rear)0.32.15.1
Headlight aim1.21.43.0
Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)1.01.72.4
Tyre tread depth (front)1.11.62.4
Fuel cap1.01.61.9

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

40in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

29in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

5in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2012 Skoda Citigo follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Brake performance (roller test, rear), about 10 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 75.0% of 3,609 first MOTs on the 2012 Skoda Citigo passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 80.4%. Among 901 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Fuel cap appears more often than on similar cars (6.4% of those tests; 58 observed failures; about 19× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2012 Skoda Citigo at the first attempt were Brake performance (roller test, rear) (10.4%), Headlight aim (7.1%) and Suspension arm pins and bushes (front) (6.9%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Fuel cap (6.4% of those tests; 58 observed failures; about 19× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Fuel cap shows up more often than on similar cars (6.4% of those tests; 58 observed failures; about 19× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2012 Skoda Citigo include Fuel cap, Brake imbalance across an axle (roller test, efficiency check, rear), Brake performance (plate test, rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2012 Skoda Citigo (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check