SEAT Leon 2009: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 59 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2009 SEAT Leon were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Drive shaft joints and boots (front).

Summary

The 2009 SEAT Leon follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 3,891 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
59 in every 100
Did not pass first time
41 in every 1001,583 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
16 yearsabout 120,419 miles
First tests counted
3,891

What failed most often

  1. Drive shaft joints and boots (front)13 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Headlight aim10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Coil spring (front)9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2009 SEAT Leon vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Four faults. The strongest is the suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front): 2.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,581 of 1,583 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 106 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Whether a suspension arm ball joint dust cover still keeps dirt out decides its grade. Severely deteriorated is Minor, while missing, or no longer preventing the ingress of dirt, is Major.

Suspension arm (rear)

Failed on 33 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a suspension arm. A component that is fractured, missing or likely to fail is graded Dangerous, and one excessively damaged or corroded is Major. On some vehicles, some highly stressed parts are thin pressed steel, and many of those have hollow box sections or up-facing areas that can collect road dirt and salt, so they get special attention.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 155 first tests, 3.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Coil spring (rear)

Failed on 134 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Shock absorbers (rear)

Failed on 93 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 115 first tests, 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

One fault: drive shaft joints and boots (front), 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Drive shaft joints and boots (front)

Failed on 213 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A constant velocity boot that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. It is Major once it is missing, split or insecure so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A transmission joint excessively worn is Major, and graded Dangerous when it is so worn it is likely to fail.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/07/2008), 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/07/2008)

Failed on 80 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One fault: handbrake performance (roller test, rear), 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 47 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake that is inoperative on one side is Major. When tested on the road, the failure is the vehicle deviating excessively from a straight line. Vehicles whose parking brake was already tested as the secondary brake are not tested again for this.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear)

Noted on 49 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Anti-roll bar (rear)

Noted on 20 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame (rear)

Noted on 283 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake performance (plate test, rear)

Noted on 25 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Other suspension component (rear)

Noted on 24 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
59in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
7in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
34in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 59.3% of 3,891 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 65.9%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 7 fixed and the 34 not fixed make the 41 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel2,497131,538 miles5859
Petrol1,393102,146 miles6161

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005200920152020Older carsNewer cars
40608010020092020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 61 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200261 in every 100397
200363 in every 100817
200461 in every 1001,048
200560 in every 1001,198
200655 in every 1001,950
200759 in every 1003,078
200860 in every 1003,533
2009 This car59 in every 1003,891
201061 in every 1004,828
201163 in every 1005,583
201265 in every 1007,838
201371 in every 10010,755
201476 in every 10017,542
201579 in every 10016,225
201680 in every 10015,083
201778 in every 10017,384
201878 in every 10020,120
201977 in every 10018,377
202084 in every 10012,952
202187 in every 10010,653
202289 in every 1003,314

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage makes a modest difference on a 2009 Leon.

Of 2009 Leon vehicles with under 90,000 miles, 63 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 151,000 miles or more, 57 in every 100 did.

Under 90,000785 tests
63
90,000–111,000783 tests
60
111,000–129,000 Typical car750 tests
59
129,000–151,000769 tests
57
151,000 and over801 tests
57

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel131,538 miles5859
Petrol102,146 miles6161

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 131,538 against 102,146). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 90,000111,000–129,000151,000 and over
Drive shaft joints and boots (front)4.25.35.7
Headlight aim3.22.15.9
Coil spring (front)2.93.53.1
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)1.43.27.2
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)3.42.11.5

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

25in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

52in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

10in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2009 SEAT Leon follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Drive shaft joints and boots (front), about 13 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 59.3% of 3,891 first MOTs on the 2009 SEAT Leon passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 65.9%. Among 1,583 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front) appears more often than on similar cars (6.7% of those tests; 106 observed failures; about 2.7× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2009 SEAT Leon at the first attempt were Drive shaft joints and boots (front) (13.5%), Headlight aim (9.8%) and Coil spring (front) (9.3%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front) (6.7% of those tests; 106 observed failures; about 2.7× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (6.7% of those tests; 106 observed failures; about 2.7× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2009 SEAT Leon include Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front), Suspension arm (rear), Drive shaft joints and boots (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2009 SEAT Leon (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check