Saab 9-3 2008: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 64 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2008 Saab 9-3 were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Coil spring (front).

Summary

The 2008 Saab 9-3 follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 4,841 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
64 in every 100
Did not pass first time
36 in every 1001,765 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
17 yearsabout 120,723 miles
First tests counted
4,841

What failed most often

  1. Coil spring (front)11 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre condition (rear)7 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2008 Saab 9-3 vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Body and structure

Two faults. The strongest is the fuel system: 12 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,764 of 1,765 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Fuel system

Failed on 44 first tests12 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A fuel tank with a hole, or a split filler neck, from which fuel can leak must be failed for leaking even if the hole or split is above the fuel line. A leaking fuel system is Major, and graded Dangerous where it leaks excessively or there is a risk of fire. Any defective part of an LPG, CNG, LNG or hydrogen system is also graded Dangerous.

Exhaust system (front)

Failed on 46 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Noise, emissions and leaks

Two faults. The strongest is the diesel emissions test (pre-reg turbo rules before 01/07/2008): 3.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel emissions test (pre-reg turbo rules before 01/07/2008)

Failed on 64 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/07/2008)

Failed on 67 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the coil spring (rear): 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Coil spring (rear)

Failed on 150 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)

Failed on 42 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 108 first tests, 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

One fault and one wear pattern. The strongest is the handbrake performance (roller test, rear): 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 57 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake that is inoperative on one side is Major. When tested on the road, the failure is the vehicle deviating excessively from a straight line. Vehicles whose parking brake was already tested as the secondary brake are not tested again for this.

Brake pads (rear)

Failed on 114 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 47 first tests6.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Other power steering components

Noted on 36 first tests5.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Macpherson strut (front)

Noted on 57 first tests4.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar (rear)

Noted on 26 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
64in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
4in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
32in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 63.5% of 4,841 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 68.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 4 fixed and the 32 not fixed make the 36 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel2,955131,759 miles6262
Petrol1,882104,725 miles6765

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100200020052008Older carsNewer cars
40608010020002008Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 65 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199965 in every 100454
200065 in every 100568
200165 in every 100608
200269 in every 100679
200363 in every 100746
200458 in every 1001,777
200561 in every 1002,719
200660 in every 1004,231
200763 in every 1005,547
2008 This car64 in every 1004,841
200964 in every 1003,192
201066 in every 1003,100
201166 in every 1002,179

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2008 Saab 9-3.

Of 2008 Saab 9-3 vehicles with under 87,000 miles, 72 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 156,000 miles or more, 59 in every 100 did.

Under 87,000978 tests
72
87,000–110,000960 tests
63
110,000–131,000 Typical car950 tests
62
131,000–156,000982 tests
61
156,000 and over968 tests
59

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel131,759 miles6162
Petrol104,725 miles6765

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 131,759 against 104,725). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 87,000110,000–131,000156,000 and over
Coil spring (front)4.23.54.1
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)1.43.56.0
Tyre condition (rear)2.92.02.4
Brake pads (rear)0.92.43.0
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)2.71.61.1

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

33in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

42in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

9in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2008 Saab 9-3 follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Coil spring (front), about 11 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 63.5% of 4,841 first MOTs on the 2008 Saab 9-3 passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 68.4%. Among 1,765 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Fuel system appears more often than on similar cars (2.5% of those tests; 44 observed failures; about 12× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2008 Saab 9-3 at the first attempt were Coil spring (front) (10.9%), Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (10.1%) and Tyre condition (rear) (7.0%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Fuel system (2.5% of those tests; 44 observed failures; about 12× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Fuel system shows up more often than on similar cars (2.5% of those tests; 44 observed failures; about 12× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2008 Saab 9-3 include Fuel system, Exhaust system (front), Coil spring (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2008 Saab 9-3 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check