Renault Captur 2018: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 79 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2018 Renault Captur were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre condition (front).

Summary

The 2018 Renault Captur follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 19,982 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
79 in every 100
Did not pass first time
21 in every 1004,270 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
7 yearsabout 43,292 miles
First tests counted
19,982

What failed most often

  1. Tyre condition (front)10 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Suspension arm ball joint (front)9 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre tread depth (front)9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2018 Renault Captur vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the reversing lights: 7.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 4,265 of 4,270 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Reversing lights

Failed on 97 first tests7.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Reversing lamps must show a white light to the rear, and on some vehicles the engine has to be running before they work. A lamp that does not emit a steady white light, does not face the rear or has its light intensity significantly reduced is Major. A lamp not securely attached is Minor, but one likely to become detached is Major.

Brake light (rear)

Failed on 340 first tests5.1 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

All stop lamps missing or not working is graded Dangerous, and so is a stop lamp that stays on when the brakes are released. A stop lamp that is missing or not working is Major. On some vehicles with LED rear lamps, part of the stop lamp can go out when the rear fog lamp is lit, which is not regarded as a defect.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

Two faults. The strongest is the brake performance (roller test, rear): 5.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 265 first tests5.9 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 143 first tests, 3.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 227 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front): 4.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 115 first tests4.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front)

Failed on 145 first tests4.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Excessive wear on an anti-roll bar linkage ball joint is Major. A joint likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 59 first tests, 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm ball joint (front)

Failed on 404 first tests4.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A suspension arm ball joint is failed under the general suspension pin, bush or joint wording. Excessively worn is Major, and likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Brake pedal

Noted on 35 first tests7.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Noted on 59 first tests4.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Brake performance (plate test, rear)

Noted on 27 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
79in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
4in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
17in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 78.6% of 19,982 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 83.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 4 fixed and the 17 not fixed make the 21 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol14,04040,948 miles7979
Diesel5,94249,847 miles7779

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020152018Older carsNewer cars
4060801002018Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 82 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
201355 in every 1005,383
201464 in every 10017,288
201567 in every 10021,754
201673 in every 10023,317
201777 in every 10018,711
2018 This car79 in every 10019,982
201982 in every 10019,176
202087 in every 10012,754
202190 in every 1009,348
202291 in every 1008,167

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2018 Captur.

Of 2018 Captur vehicles with under 29,000 miles, 88 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 61,000 miles or more, 68 in every 100 did.

Under 29,0004,016 tests
88
29,000–39,0004,111 tests
83
39,000–48,000 Typical car3,839 tests
79
48,000–61,0004,129 tests
75
61,000 and over3,878 tests
68

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol40,948 miles7979
Diesel49,847 miles7779

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 49,847 against 40,948). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 29,00039,000–48,00061,000 and over
Tyre condition (front)1.62.02.6
Suspension arm ball joint (front)0.72.03.1
Tyre tread depth (front)0.61.83.5
Brake pads (front)1.11.71.9
Brake light (rear)0.41.73.4

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

49in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

23in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

6in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2018 Renault Captur follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Tyre condition (front), about 10 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 78.6% of 19,982 first MOTs on the 2018 Renault Captur passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 83.4%. Among 4,270 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Brake performance (roller test, rear) appears more often than on similar cars (6.2% of those tests; 265 observed failures; about 5.9× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2018 Renault Captur at the first attempt were Tyre condition (front) (9.6%), Suspension arm ball joint (front) (9.5%) and Tyre tread depth (front) (9.1%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Brake performance (roller test, rear) (6.2% of those tests; 265 observed failures; about 5.9× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Brake performance (roller test, rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (6.2% of those tests; 265 observed failures; about 5.9× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2018 Renault Captur include Brake performance (roller test, rear), Brake light (rear), Reversing lights. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2018 Renault Captur (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check