Model Reports 5 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

Peugeot Partner 2011: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 52 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2011 Peugeot Partner were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

A 2011 Peugeot Partner passed first time about 3 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2010 and 2012 model years.

At a glance

How 5,938 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
52 in every 100
Did not pass first time
48 in every 1002,857 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
14 yearsabout 128,336 miles
First tests counted
5,938

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)21 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Drive shaft joints and boots (front)14 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Brake light12 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2011 Peugeot Partner vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: seat belt condition (front), 5.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,838 of 2,857 failed first attempts (99.3%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Seat belt condition (front)

Failed on 61 first tests5.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Any sign of overstretching is a deficiency, and so is a cut anywhere on a child seat belt. On other belts the size of a cut decides it, with a stricter limit at the webbing edge than away from it. Webbing significantly stretched or weakened has rows in both Major and Dangerous grades.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 69 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

Three faults. The strongest is the horn: 4.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Horn

Failed on 195 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A horn that does not work, or is likely to be confused with an emergency vehicle siren, is graded Major. Gongs, bells, sirens and anything with more than one tone, which includes a horn that alternates between its notes, are not allowed, except a gong, bell or siren on vehicles first used before a set date. Sound defects are Minor for named cases such as a bell or harsh sound, and Major under a general row.

Brake light (rear)

Failed on 341 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

All stop lamps missing or not working is graded Dangerous, and so is a stop lamp that stays on when the brakes are released. A stop lamp that is missing or not working is Major. On some vehicles with LED rear lamps, part of the stop lamp can go out when the rear fog lamp is lit, which is not regarded as a defect.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 83 first tests, 4.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Number plate lights

Failed on 247 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Registration plate lamps must light up the rear registration plate and operate at the same time as the position lamps. A missing or inoperative lamp is Major when the plate has only one lamp or all its lamps are not working, and Minor when the plate has several lamps or light sources and not all have failed. A lamp throwing direct white light to the rear is also Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/07/2008), 4.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/07/2008)

Failed on 206 first tests4.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Body and structure

One fault: drive shaft joints and boots (front), 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Drive shaft joints and boots (front)

Failed on 401 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A constant velocity boot that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. It is Major once it is missing, split or insecure so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A transmission joint excessively worn is Major, and graded Dangerous when it is so worn it is likely to fail.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One fault: anti-lock braking system (ABS), 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-lock braking system (ABS)

Failed on 133 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

ABS is failed as removed only where it has obviously been removed, because not every vehicle in the age range where removal is not permitted has ABS. A warning lamp that does not light or shows an ABS fault is Major, as is a missing or excessively damaged wheel speed sensor. Every failure row for this component is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Headlight

Noted on 42 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
52in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
10in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
38in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 51.9% of 5,938 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 62.5%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 10 fixed and the 38 not fixed make the 48 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201120152020Older carsNewer cars
40608010020112020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 51 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200248 in every 100427
200348 in every 100814
200450 in every 100953
200551 in every 1001,180
200654 in every 1001,639
200751 in every 1001,849
200850 in every 1002,297
200950 in every 1003,280
201051 in every 1004,432
2011 This car52 in every 1005,938
201259 in every 10010,027
201353 in every 1008,587
201458 in every 10012,849
201561 in every 10012,262
201659 in every 10012,508
201760 in every 10013,059
201861 in every 10013,167
201973 in every 10011,981
202078 in every 1009,489
202172 in every 10010,020
202274 in every 1006,506

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2011 Partner.

Of 2011 Partner vehicles with under 89,000 miles, 59 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 171,000 miles or more, 48 in every 100 did.

Under 89,0001,194 tests
59
89,000–116,0001,168 tests
53
116,000–141,000 Typical car1,163 tests
50
141,000–171,0001,190 tests
50
171,000 and over1,191 tests
48

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 89,000116,000–141,000171,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)5.011.412.7
Drive shaft joints and boots (front)6.46.86.9
Brake light4.45.86.1
Coil spring (front)5.96.34.6
Number plate lights3.04.85.0

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.

When a car fails

20in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

57in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

11in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2011 Peugeot Partner passed first time about 3 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2010 and 2012 model years. In 2025, 51.9% of 5,938 first MOTs on the 2011 Peugeot Partner passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 62.5%. Among 2,857 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Seat belt condition (front) appears more often than on similar cars (2.1% of those tests; 61 observed failures; about 5.3× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2011 Peugeot Partner at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (21.2%), Drive shaft joints and boots (front) (14.1%) and Brake light (12.0%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Seat belt condition (front) (2.1% of those tests; 61 observed failures; about 5.3× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Seat belt condition (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (2.1% of those tests; 61 observed failures; about 5.3× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2011 Peugeot Partner include Seat belt condition (front), Horn, Brake light (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2011 Peugeot Partner (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check