Model Reports 4 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

Peugeot Expert 2007: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 48 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2007 Peugeot Expert were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Drive shaft joints and boots (front).

Summary

The 2007 Peugeot Expert follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 1,530 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
48 in every 100
Did not pass first time
52 in every 100790 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
18 yearsabout 141,002 miles
First tests counted
1,530

What failed most often

  1. Drive shaft joints and boots (front)20 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)17 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)14 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2007 Peugeot Expert vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: seat belt mounting area (front), 5.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 763 of 790 failed first attempts (96.6%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like. 3.4% of failures are excluded because no mileage was recorded, so treat these shares as indicative for this model year.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Seat belt mounting area (front)

Failed on 33 first tests5.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A seat belt anchorage likely to become detached in the event of a collision is graded Dangerous. The load bearing structure near an anchorage, called a prescribed area, is Major when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Anchorage points are inspected for all seat belts fitted, except a belt with no corresponding seat.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the suspension mounting area (front): 4.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension mounting area (front)

Failed on 37 first tests4.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

The load bearing structure within a set distance of a sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting is a prescribed area. Major applies when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Dangerous applies when it is so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 55 first tests, 11 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension mounting area (rear)

Failed on 86 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The load bearing structure within a set distance of a sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting is a prescribed area. Major applies when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Dangerous applies when it is so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the individual direction indicators (rear): 3.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Failed on 57 first tests3.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 28 first tests, 2.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Rear fog light

Failed on 33 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing obligatory rear fog lamp, one that is not working, or one that does not emit a steady red light is graded Major. A rear fog lamp adversely affected by the operation of any other lamp is Major too. The manual allows it to go out when main beam is switched on or when dipped beam headlamps are switched off.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

One fault: drive shaft joints and boots (front), 2.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Drive shaft joints and boots (front)

Failed on 153 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A constant velocity boot that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. It is Major once it is missing, split or insecure so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A transmission joint excessively worn is Major, and graded Dangerous when it is so worn it is likely to fail.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Other power steering components

Noted on 27 first tests7.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake light

Noted on 28 first tests3.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Seat belt condition (front)

Noted on 30 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Vehicle structure condition

Noted on 21 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Exhaust system (rear)

Noted on 43 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm ball joint (front)

Noted on 43 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
48in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
10in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
42in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 48.4% of 1,530 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 58.1%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 10 fixed and the 42 not fixed make the 52 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002007201020152020Older carsNewer cars
406080100200720102020Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 49 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200449 in every 100351
200545 in every 100630
200651 in every 100844
2007 This car48 in every 1001,530
200850 in every 1001,747
200950 in every 1001,367
201050 in every 1001,601
201152 in every 1002,023
201253 in every 1002,022
201355 in every 1001,735
201462 in every 1003,061
201564 in every 1004,419
201658 in every 1003,714
201771 in every 1003,914
201871 in every 1004,569
201979 in every 1005,772
202084 in every 1003,425
202183 in every 1004,374
202279 in every 1005,256

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2007 Peugeot Expert follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Drive shaft joints and boots (front), about 20 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 48.4% of 1,530 first MOTs on the 2007 Peugeot Expert passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 58.1%. Among 790 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Seat belt mounting area (front) appears more often than on similar cars (4.3% of those tests; 33 observed failures; about 5.7× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2007 Peugeot Expert at the first attempt were Drive shaft joints and boots (front) (20.1%), Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (17.0%) and Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (14.0%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Seat belt mounting area (front) (4.3% of those tests; 33 observed failures; about 5.7× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Seat belt mounting area (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (4.3% of those tests; 33 observed failures; about 5.7× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2007 Peugeot Expert include Seat belt mounting area (front), Suspension mounting area (front), Individual direction indicators (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2007 Peugeot Expert (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check