Peugeot Boxer 2014: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 75 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2014 Peugeot Boxer were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test).

Summary

The 2014 Peugeot Boxer follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 2,572 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
75 in every 100
Did not pass first time
25 in every 100645 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
11 yearsabout 42,208 miles
First tests counted
2,572

What failed most often

  1. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)16 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Headlight aim11 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2014 Peugeot Boxer vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Two faults. The strongest is the brake efficiency below minimum (roller test): 7.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 640 of 645 failed first attempts (99.2%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Brake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 28 first tests7.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Service brake efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and efficiency less than half of the required value is graded Dangerous. On a roller brake tester, if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock, the efficiency requirement for that system counts as met.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 105 first tests4.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: airbag warning light, 5.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Airbag warning light

Failed on 42 first tests5.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

The airbag warning lamp (SRS MIL in DVSA's wording) is failed only if it indicates a system malfunction, which is Major. A lamp lit to show the passenger airbag is disabled is not to be regarded as a defect. Dashboard messages are not a defect in their own right, though they can help the tester confirm a malfunction.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

One fault: shock absorbers (front), 3.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Shock absorbers (front)

Failed on 42 first tests3.9 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 59 first tests, 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

Two faults. The strongest is the diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/01/2014): 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/01/2014)

Failed on 32 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Diesel engine warning light

Failed on 34 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

An engine malfunction indicator lamp that is illuminated to show a malfunction is graded Major on a diesel, but only on the diesels the test covers, which depends on the vehicle type and when it was first used. DVSA lists it under exhaust emissions for compression ignition engines, and the detail line for the row also names an inoperative lamp.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: side repeater indicators, 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Side repeater indicators

Failed on 26 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Sequential or dynamic direction indicators are not a reason to fail. Where a side repeater is required, it is allowed to be part of the front direction indicator if it has a marked wraparound lens, or an amber light coming through the front lens when viewed from a set distance to the side of the rear bumper. A lens defect with no effect on the emitted light is Minor, and one that adversely affects the light is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
75in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
5in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
20in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 74.9% of 2,572 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 80.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 5 fixed and the 20 not fixed make the 25 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100199520002005201020142020Older carsNewer cars
4060801002000201020142020Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199551 in every 100709
199652 in every 100635
199755 in every 100851
199854 in every 1001,014
199957 in every 1001,094
200058 in every 1001,178
200157 in every 1001,121
200258 in every 1001,393
200365 in every 1001,819
200462 in every 1002,181
200563 in every 1002,240
200666 in every 1002,399
200770 in every 1002,199
200872 in every 1002,081
200972 in every 1001,691
201079 in every 1001,896
201177 in every 1002,018
201276 in every 1002,168
201377 in every 1002,328
2014 This car75 in every 1002,572
201577 in every 1002,996
201678 in every 1003,149
201779 in every 1003,057
201881 in every 1002,142
201982 in every 1002,009
202084 in every 1001,593
202181 in every 1001,776
202287 in every 100800

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2014 Boxer.

Of 2014 Boxer vehicles with under 24,000 miles, 87 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 116,000 miles or more, 56 in every 100 did.

Under 24,000514 tests
87
24,000–34,000509 tests
86
34,000–57,000 Typical car513 tests
80
57,000–116,000520 tests
66
116,000 and over507 tests
56

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 24,00034,000–57,000116,000 and over
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)0.41.411.6
Headlight aim0.82.14.7

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

36in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

40in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

4in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2014 Peugeot Boxer follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test), about 16 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 74.9% of 2,572 first MOTs on the 2014 Peugeot Boxer passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 80.2%. Among 645 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Brake efficiency below minimum (roller test) appears more often than on similar cars (4.4% of those tests; 28 observed failures; about 7.5× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2014 Peugeot Boxer at the first attempt were Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (16.4%) and Headlight aim (11.1%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Brake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (4.4% of those tests; 28 observed failures; about 7.5× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Brake efficiency below minimum (roller test) shows up more often than on similar cars (4.4% of those tests; 28 observed failures; about 7.5× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2014 Peugeot Boxer include Brake efficiency below minimum (roller test), Airbag warning light, Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2014 Peugeot Boxer (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check