Peugeot 308 2017: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 72 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2017 Peugeot 308 were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre condition (front).

Summary

The 2017 Peugeot 308 follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 8,588 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
72 in every 100
Did not pass first time
28 in every 1002,411 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
8 yearsabout 65,104 miles
First tests counted
8,588

What failed most often

  1. Tyre condition (front)12 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Coil spring (front)11 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Number plate lights8 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2017 Peugeot 308 vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Body and structure

Two faults. The strongest is the exhaust system (rear): 8.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,409 of 2,411 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Exhaust system (rear)

Failed on 75 first tests8.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 85 first tests, 8.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Drive shaft joints and boots (front)

Failed on 184 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A constant velocity boot that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. It is Major once it is missing, split or insecure so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A transmission joint excessively worn is Major, and graded Dangerous when it is so worn it is likely to fail.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

Four faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar ball joint (front): 5.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar ball joint (front)

Failed on 51 first tests5.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

On an anti-roll bar ball joint, DVSA fails a suspension pin, bush or joint that is excessively worn as Major. One likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 22 first tests, 5.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front)

Failed on 176 first tests5.2 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Excessive wear on an anti-roll bar linkage ball joint is Major. A joint likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 143 first tests, 7.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 71 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Coil spring (front)

Failed on 261 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: petrol emissions (with catalyst), 3.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 156 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: number plate lights (rear), 3.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Number plate lights (rear)

Failed on 185 first tests3.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Registration plate lamps must light up the rear registration plate and operate at the same time as the position lamps. A missing or inoperative lamp is Major when the plate has only one lamp or all its lamps are not working, and Minor when the plate has several lamps or light sources and not all have failed. A lamp throwing direct white light to the rear is also Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre tread depth (rear), 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre tread depth (rear)

Failed on 170 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Only primary grooves count when tread depth is assessed: those holding the wear indicators, or cut as deep as those when new. Shallower secondary grooves are ignored. Tread depth below the minimum for the vehicle is Dangerous, and so is a pattern not visible over the whole tread, but that second row applies only to vehicles that need the lower minimum.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Flexible brake hoses (rear)

Noted on 20 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
72in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
4in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
24in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 71.9% of 8,588 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 76.5%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 4 fixed and the 24 not fixed make the 28 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel4,63777,020 miles7071
Petrol3,94854,880 miles7571

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100201020172020Older carsNewer cars
406080100201020172020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 75 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200745 in every 100556
200849 in every 1005,515
200949 in every 1008,392
201052 in every 1009,728
201157 in every 1008,047
201255 in every 1008,838
201354 in every 1009,434
201462 in every 10011,161
201567 in every 10012,989
201669 in every 10013,556
2017 This car72 in every 1008,588
201877 in every 1008,002
201981 in every 1006,840
202085 in every 1003,618
202183 in every 1001,538
202288 in every 1003,689

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2017 Peugeot 308.

Of 2017 Peugeot 308 vehicles with under 45,000 miles, 82 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 92,000 miles or more, 64 in every 100 did.

Under 45,0001,710 tests
82
45,000–59,0001,758 tests
76
59,000–72,000 Typical car1,710 tests
70
72,000–92,0001,713 tests
67
92,000 and over1,693 tests
64

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel77,020 miles7071
Petrol54,880 miles7571

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 77,020 against 54,880). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 45,00059,000–72,00092,000 and over
Tyre condition (front)2.34.03.2
Coil spring (front)1.82.83.5
Number plate lights0.62.03.3
Drive shaft joints and boots (front)2.02.21.6
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front)1.22.12.7

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

46in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

27in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

9in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2017 Peugeot 308 follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Tyre condition (front), about 12 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 71.9% of 8,588 first MOTs on the 2017 Peugeot 308 passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 76.5%. Among 2,411 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front) appears more often than on similar cars (7.3% of those tests; 176 observed failures; about 5.2× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2017 Peugeot 308 at the first attempt were Tyre condition (front) (12.0%), Coil spring (front) (10.8%) and Number plate lights (7.7%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front) (7.3% of those tests; 176 observed failures; about 5.2× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (7.3% of those tests; 176 observed failures; about 5.2× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2017 Peugeot 308 include Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front), Exhaust system (rear), Anti-roll bar ball joint (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2017 Peugeot 308 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check