Peugeot 307 2007: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 49 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2007 Peugeot 307 were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

The 2007 Peugeot 307 follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 5,519 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
49 in every 100
Did not pass first time
51 in every 1002,811 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
18 yearsabout 96,415 miles
First tests counted
5,519

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)13 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Drive shaft joints and boots (front)13 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Headlight9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2007 Peugeot 307 vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Steering

Two faults. The strongest is the steering rack (front): 5.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,809 of 2,811 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Steering rack (front)

Failed on 90 first tests5.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Steering gear casing retaining devices dangerously loose, or visible relative movement to the chassis or bodywork, is graded Dangerous. A casing not properly attached, or fractured, is Major, but a fracture that affects the stability or attachment of the casing is Dangerous. A gaiter damaged but still keeping dirt out is Minor, and Major once missing or no longer doing so.

Track rod end (front)

Failed on 232 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play is Major, and one worn to the extent there is a serious risk of detachment is graded Dangerous. A dust cover that is damaged but still keeps dirt out is Minor, and one missing or no longer keeping dirt out is Major. Testers must tell wear from a joint's built-in clearance or spring loading.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 126 first tests, 3.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

One fault: suspension mounting area (front), 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension mounting area (front)

Failed on 65 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The load bearing structure within a set distance of a sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting is a prescribed area. Major applies when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Dangerous applies when it is so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the individual sidelight or tail light (rear): 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual sidelight or tail light (rear)

Failed on 251 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Rear fog light

Failed on 88 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing obligatory rear fog lamp, one that is not working, or one that does not emit a steady red light is graded Major. A rear fog lamp adversely affected by the operation of any other lamp is Major too. The manual allows it to go out when main beam is switched on or when dipped beam headlamps are switched off.

Headlight aim not tested

Failed on 48 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Headlamp aim recorded as not tested, or unable to be tested, is a Major failure. These results must only be used where it becomes apparent during the test that the item cannot be tested, and this could not have been identified before starting. The reason must be included in the additional information box.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One wear pattern: brake discs (rear), 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 69 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 450 first tests, 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Engine mounting condition

Noted on 22 first tests7.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Swivel pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 116 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Suspension sub-frame pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 35 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Individual direction indicators (front)

Noted on 81 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake performance (plate test, rear)

Noted on 45 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Non-component advisories (front)

Noted on 358 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
49in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
9in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
42in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 49.1% of 5,519 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 57.5%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 9 fixed and the 42 not fixed make the 51 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol3,64186,786 miles5048
Diesel1,878116,649 miles4749

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002002200320042005200620072008Older carsNewer cars
4060801002007Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200247 in every 100996
200347 in every 1001,632
200448 in every 1002,421
200547 in every 1003,253
200650 in every 1005,130
2007 This car49 in every 1005,519
200851 in every 1001,398

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2007 Peugeot 307.

Of 2007 Peugeot 307 vehicles with under 68,000 miles, 59 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 130,000 miles or more, 43 in every 100 did.

Under 68,0001,098 tests
59
68,000–87,0001,104 tests
52
87,000–106,000 Typical car1,123 tests
49
106,000–130,0001,098 tests
43
130,000 and over1,093 tests
43

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol86,786 miles5048
Diesel116,649 miles4749

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 116,649 against 86,786). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 68,00087,000–106,000130,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)3.37.28.6
Drive shaft joints and boots (front)7.26.18.0
Headlight4.04.56.0
Track rod end (front)2.64.85.3
Brake light3.33.35.5

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

18in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

59in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

12in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2007 Peugeot 307 follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Individual sidelight or tail light (front), about 13 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 49.1% of 5,519 first MOTs on the 2007 Peugeot 307 passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 57.5%. Among 2,811 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Steering rack (front) appears more often than on similar cars (3.2% of those tests; 90 observed failures; about 5.4× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2007 Peugeot 307 at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (12.9%), Drive shaft joints and boots (front) (12.9%) and Headlight (9.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Steering rack (front) (3.2% of those tests; 90 observed failures; about 5.4× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Steering rack (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (3.2% of those tests; 90 observed failures; about 5.4× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2007 Peugeot 307 include Steering rack (front), Suspension mounting area (front), Individual sidelight or tail light (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2007 Peugeot 307 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check