Peugeot 206 2003: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 52 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2003 Peugeot 206 were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Petrol emissions (with catalyst).

Summary

The 2003 Peugeot 206 follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 4,682 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
52 in every 100
Did not pass first time
48 in every 1002,230 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
22 yearsabout 81,122 miles
First tests counted
4,682

What failed most often

  1. Petrol emissions (with catalyst)10 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2003 Peugeot 206 vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Two faults. The strongest is the brake load-sensing valve: 14 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,227 of 2,230 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Brake load-sensing valve

Failed on 84 first tests14 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A load sensing valve that is seized or inoperative is Major when ABS is functioning, and graded Dangerous when ABS is not fitted or inoperative. A valve missing where fitted as standard is graded Dangerous too. A linkage that is obviously incorrectly adjusted is Major.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 30 first tests, 13 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake imbalance across an axle (roller test, efficiency check, rear)

Failed on 121 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A wheel giving less than a set share of the maximum effort from the other wheel on the same axle is Major. On a steered axle, less than half is graded Dangerous. Testers disregard an imbalance if the lower effort is the result of a locked wheel, or if the higher effort from a wheel is at or below a low set figure.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

Three faults. The strongest is the side repeater indicators: 3.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Side repeater indicators

Failed on 128 first tests3.9 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Sequential or dynamic direction indicators are not a reason to fail. Where a side repeater is required, it is allowed to be part of the front direction indicator if it has a marked wraparound lens, or an amber light coming through the front lens when viewed from a set distance to the side of the rear bumper. A lens defect with no effect on the emitted light is Minor, and one that adversely affects the light is Major.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 84 first tests, 6.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Rear fog light

Failed on 160 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing obligatory rear fog lamp, one that is not working, or one that does not emit a steady red light is graded Major. A rear fog lamp adversely affected by the operation of any other lamp is Major too. The manual allows it to go out when main beam is switched on or when dipped beam headlamps are switched off.

Individual sidelight or tail light (rear)

Failed on 161 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 73 first tests, 9.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

Two faults. The strongest is the exhaust system (front): 3.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Exhaust system (front)

Failed on 61 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 89 first tests, 2.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Exhaust system (rear)

Failed on 101 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front): 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front)

Failed on 113 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Excessive wear on an anti-roll bar linkage ball joint is Major. A joint likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 111 first tests, 3.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 159 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Anti-roll bar ball joint (front)

Noted on 23 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Coil spring (front)

Noted on 201 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
52in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
9in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
39in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 52.4% of 4,682 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 61.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 9 fixed and the 39 not fixed make the 48 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol3,71775,166 miles5352
Diesel965108,864 miles5054

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002003Older carsNewer cars
40608010020002003Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 50 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199950 in every 100366
200053 in every 100808
200152 in every 1002,132
200251 in every 1003,468
2003 This car52 in every 1004,682
200453 in every 1006,777
200554 in every 1006,383
200654 in every 1004,805
200756 in every 1002,111
200855 in every 100975
200949 in every 100465

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2003 Peugeot 206.

Of 2003 Peugeot 206 vehicles with under 53,000 miles, 62 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 112,000 miles or more, 47 in every 100 did.

Under 53,000917 tests
62
53,000–72,000959 tests
54
72,000–91,000 Typical car963 tests
54
91,000–112,000886 tests
45
112,000 and over950 tests
47

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol75,166 miles5352
Diesel108,864 miles5054

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 108,864 against 75,166). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 53,00072,000–91,000112,000 and over
Petrol emissions (with catalyst)2.96.44.1
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)1.64.96.8
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)1.54.95.5
Headlight aim3.25.35.1
Suspension arm ball joint (front)1.74.76.4

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

18in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

62in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

10in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2003 Peugeot 206 follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Petrol emissions (with catalyst), about 10 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 52.4% of 4,682 first MOTs on the 2003 Peugeot 206 passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 61.4%. Among 2,230 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Brake load-sensing valve appears more often than on similar cars (3.8% of those tests; 84 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2003 Peugeot 206 at the first attempt were Petrol emissions (with catalyst) (10.4%), Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (10.1%) and Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (9.7%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Brake load-sensing valve (3.8% of those tests; 84 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Brake load-sensing valve shows up more often than on similar cars (3.8% of those tests; 84 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2003 Peugeot 206 include Brake load-sensing valve, Side repeater indicators, Exhaust system (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2003 Peugeot 206 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check