Model Reports 5 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

Nissan Qashqai 2010: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 45 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2010 Nissan Qashqai were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Track rod end (front).

Summary

The 2010 Nissan Qashqai follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 26,166 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
45 in every 100
Did not pass first time
55 in every 10014,347 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
15 yearsabout 115,353 miles
First tests counted
26,166

What failed most often

  1. Track rod end (front)24 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Drive shaft joints and boots (front)23 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)22 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2010 Nissan Qashqai vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Five faults. The strongest is the suspension arm (rear): 7.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 14,342 of 14,347 failed first attempts that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension arm (rear)

Failed on 1,019 first tests7.6 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a suspension arm. A component that is fractured, missing or likely to fail is graded Dangerous, and one excessively damaged or corroded is Major. On some vehicles, some highly stressed parts are thin pressed steel, and many of those have hollow box sections or up-facing areas that can collect road dirt and salt, so they get special attention.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 1,483 first tests, 3.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm ball joint (front)

Failed on 2,577 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension arm ball joint is failed under the general suspension pin, bush or joint wording. Excessively worn is Major, and likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front)

Failed on 1,279 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Excessive wear on an anti-roll bar linkage ball joint is Major. A joint likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Anti-roll bar ball joint (front)

Failed on 352 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

On an anti-roll bar ball joint, DVSA fails a suspension pin, bush or joint that is excessively worn as Major. One likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)

Failed on 1,329 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Steering

One fault: track rod end (front), 5.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Track rod end (front)

Failed on 3,394 first tests5.1 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play is Major, and one worn to the extent there is a serious risk of detachment is graded Dangerous. A dust cover that is damaged but still keeps dirt out is Minor, and one missing or no longer keeping dirt out is Major. Testers must tell wear from a joint's built-in clearance or spring loading.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 953 first tests, 4.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: airbag warning light, 4.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Airbag warning light

Failed on 1,042 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

The airbag warning lamp (SRS MIL in DVSA's wording) is failed only if it indicates a system malfunction, which is Major. A lamp lit to show the passenger airbag is disabled is not to be regarded as a defect. Dashboard messages are not a defect in their own right, though they can help the tester confirm a malfunction.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Body and structure

One fault: drive shaft joints and boots (front), 4.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Drive shaft joints and boots (front)

Failed on 3,328 first tests4.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A constant velocity boot that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. It is Major once it is missing, split or insecure so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A transmission joint excessively worn is Major, and graded Dangerous when it is so worn it is likely to fail.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 41 first tests, 4.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

One fault and one wear pattern. The strongest is the handbrake performance (roller test, rear): 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 534 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake that is inoperative on one side is Major. When tested on the road, the failure is the vehicle deviating excessively from a straight line. Vehicles whose parking brake was already tested as the secondary brake are not tested again for this.

Brake pads (rear)

Failed on 961 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 1,443 first tests, 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Suspension sub-frame pins and bushes (front)

Noted on 332 first tests18 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

Driver's door hinge (front)

Noted on 25 first tests8.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake pedal

Noted on 257 first tests3.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 151 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Side repeater indicators (front)

Noted on 81 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
45in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
8in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
47in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 45.2% of 26,166 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 53.0%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 47 not fixed make the 55 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel15,159122,454 miles4344
Petrol11,005105,070 miles4847

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100201020152020Older carsNewer cars
40608010020102020Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 44 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200744 in every 1007,157
200842 in every 10010,306
200942 in every 10018,193
2010 This car45 in every 10026,166
201147 in every 10029,126
201250 in every 10036,763
201352 in every 10042,253
201465 in every 10041,861
201568 in every 10053,336
201671 in every 10055,751
201776 in every 10057,212
201879 in every 10045,117
201983 in every 10047,673
202087 in every 10031,521
202188 in every 10028,472
202290 in every 10040,576

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2010 Qashqai.

Of 2010 Qashqai vehicles with under 89,000 miles, 55 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 143,000 miles or more, 41 in every 100 did.

Under 89,0005,204 tests
55
89,000–107,0005,120 tests
45
107,000–123,000 Typical car5,357 tests
42
123,000–143,0005,324 tests
42
143,000 and over5,152 tests
41

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested		Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel122,454 miles4344
Petrol105,070 miles4847

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 122,454 against 105,070). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 89,000107,000–123,000143,000 and over
Track rod end (front)7.814.215.5
Drive shaft joints and boots (front)9.013.713.3
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)7.813.114.1
Suspension arm ball joint (front)5.510.911.8
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)2.26.910.9

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.

When a car fails

18in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

61in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

15in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2010 Nissan Qashqai follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Track rod end (front), about 24 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 45.2% of 26,166 first MOTs on the 2010 Nissan Qashqai passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 53.0%. Among 14,347 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension arm (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (7.1% of those tests; 1,019 observed failures; about 7.6× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2010 Nissan Qashqai at the first attempt were Track rod end (front) (23.7%), Drive shaft joints and boots (front) (23.2%) and Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (22.2%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension arm (rear) (7.1% of those tests; 1,019 observed failures; about 7.6× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension arm (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (7.1% of those tests; 1,019 observed failures; about 7.6× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2010 Nissan Qashqai include Suspension arm (rear), Track rod end (front), Airbag warning light. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2010 Nissan Qashqai (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check