Nissan Note 2008: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 51 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2008 Nissan Note were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

At the same mileage, a petrol 2008 Nissan Note passed first time more often than a diesel one: 51 in every 100 against 45 in every 100.

At a glance

How 13,223 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
51 in every 100
Did not pass first time
49 in every 1006,472 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
17 yearsabout 97,389 miles
First tests counted
13,223

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)19 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Headlight aim14 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Suspension arm ball joint (front)13 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2008 Nissan Note vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Six faults. The strongest is the suspension sub-frame pins and bushes (front): 56 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 6,461 of 6,472 failed first attempts (99.8%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension sub-frame pins and bushes (front)

Failed on 248 first tests56 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A sub-frame pin or bush with excessive wear is Major. Under DVSA's general wording for a suspension pin, bush or joint, one likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 300 first tests, 33 times as often as on similar cars.

Wheel bearings (rear)

Failed on 268 first tests3.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Excessive play in a wheel bearing, or a bearing that is excessively rough, is Major. Play so excessive that the bearing is likely to break up or directional control is impaired is Dangerous, and so is a bearing so rough that it is likely to overheat or break up.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 151 first tests, 2.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension mounting area (front)

Failed on 158 first tests3.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

The load bearing structure within a set distance of a sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting is a prescribed area. Major applies when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Dangerous applies when it is so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 116 first tests, 3.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)

Failed on 626 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Suspension arm ball joint (front)

Failed on 814 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension arm ball joint is failed under the general suspension pin, bush or joint wording. Excessively worn is Major, and likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 298 first tests, 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Coil spring (front)

Failed on 776 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: airbag warning light, 3.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Airbag warning light

Failed on 392 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

The airbag warning lamp (SRS MIL in DVSA's wording) is failed only if it indicates a system malfunction, which is Major. A lamp lit to show the passenger airbag is disabled is not to be regarded as a defect. Dashboard messages are not a defect in their own right, though they can help the tester confirm a malfunction.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 25 first tests, 3.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the horn: 2.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Horn

Failed on 234 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A horn that does not work, or is likely to be confused with an emergency vehicle siren, is graded Major. Gongs, bells, sirens and anything with more than one tone, which includes a horn that alternates between its notes, are not allowed, except a gong, bell or siren on vehicles first used before a set date. Sound defects are Minor for named cases such as a bell or harsh sound, and Major under a general row.

Number plate lights (rear)

Failed on 268 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Registration plate lamps must light up the rear registration plate and operate at the same time as the position lamps. A missing or inoperative lamp is Major when the plate has only one lamp or all its lamps are not working, and Minor when the plate has several lamps or light sources and not all have failed. A lamp throwing direct white light to the rear is also Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Side repeater indicators (front)

Noted on 74 first tests6.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake light (rear)

Noted on 175 first tests3.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Macpherson strut (front)

Noted on 132 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Headlight (front)

Noted on 348 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
51in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
12in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
37in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 51.1% of 13,223 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 63.1%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 12 fixed and the 37 not fixed make the 49 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol12,85296,806 miles5151
Diesel370116,728 miles4245

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020082015Older carsNewer cars
4060801002008Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 52 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200649 in every 1007,318
200750 in every 10010,076
2008 This car51 in every 10013,223
200954 in every 10013,504
201055 in every 10013,004
201157 in every 10011,196
201258 in every 10011,143
201363 in every 10011,398
201472 in every 10021,068
201578 in every 10014,496
201682 in every 10010,463
201782 in every 1005,027

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2008 Nissan Note.

Of 2008 Nissan Note vehicles with under 70,000 miles, 65 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 127,000 miles or more, 43 in every 100 did.

Under 70,0002,671 tests
65
70,000–89,0002,643 tests
52
89,000–106,000 Typical car2,559 tests
48
106,000–127,0002,691 tests
47
127,000 and over2,647 tests
43

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol96,806 miles5151
Diesel116,728 miles4245

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Part of the gap is mileage: diesel cars have done more miles. Even at the same mileage, petrol passed more often (51 against 45 in every 100).


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 70,00089,000–106,000127,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)4.210.912.0
Headlight aim4.67.38.3
Suspension arm ball joint (front)2.76.49.5
Coil spring (front)5.06.35.7
Brake light4.55.46.2

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

21in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

58in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

9in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

At the same mileage, a petrol 2008 Nissan Note passed first time more often than a diesel one: 51 in every 100 against 45 in every 100. In 2025, 51.1% of 13,223 first MOTs on the 2008 Nissan Note passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 63.1%. Among 6,472 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension sub-frame pins and bushes (front) appears more often than on similar cars (3.8% of those tests; 248 observed failures; about 56× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2008 Nissan Note at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (19.3%), Headlight aim (13.9%) and Suspension arm ball joint (front) (12.6%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension sub-frame pins and bushes (front) (3.8% of those tests; 248 observed failures; about 56× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension sub-frame pins and bushes (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (3.8% of those tests; 248 observed failures; about 56× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2008 Nissan Note include Suspension sub-frame pins and bushes (front), Wheel bearings (rear), Suspension mounting area (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2008 Nissan Note (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check