Model Reports 4 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

Nissan Navara 2006: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 54 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2006 Nissan Navara were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Chassis condition (rear).

Summary

The 2006 Nissan Navara follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 1,374 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
54 in every 100
Did not pass first time
46 in every 100632 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
19 yearsabout 140,884 miles
First tests counted
1,374

What failed most often

  1. Chassis condition (rear)18 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Suspension mounting area (rear)15 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)14 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2006 Nissan Navara vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the suspension spring mounting area (rear): 17 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 631 of 632 failed first attempts (99.8%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension spring mounting area (rear)

Failed on 33 first tests17 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Testers check the strength and continuity of the load bearing structure within a set distance of a spring, sub-frame or suspension mounting, an area DVSA calls a prescribed area. Strength that is significantly reduced, or an area inadequately repaired, is Major. Structure so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected is graded Dangerous.

Wheel bearings (front)

Failed on 42 first tests3.9 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Excessive play in a wheel bearing, or a bearing that is excessively rough, is Major. Play so excessive that the bearing is likely to break up or directional control is impaired is Dangerous, and so is a bearing so rough that it is likely to overheat or break up.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 34 first tests, 3.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension mounting area (rear)

Failed on 93 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The load bearing structure within a set distance of a sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting is a prescribed area. Major applies when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Dangerous applies when it is so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

Two faults. The strongest is the propeller shaft joints (front): 14 times as often as on similar cars.

Propeller shaft joints (front)

Failed on 22 first tests14 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A transmission joint, belt or chain that is excessively worn is Major, and one so worn it is likely to fail is graded Dangerous. A constant velocity joint boot that is severely deteriorated is Minor. A boot that is missing, or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, is Major.

Chassis condition (rear)

Failed on 114 first tests12 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A main load-bearing structural member that is fractured, deformed, modified or inadequately repaired is Major when structural rigidity is significantly reduced, and Dangerous where steering or braking is likely to be adversely affected. Corrosion of the body, cab or chassis at a mounting point is Dangerous where overall security or stability is impaired.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 44 first tests, 4.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

Two faults. The strongest is the brake efficiency below minimum (roller test): 7.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 34 first tests7.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Service brake efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and efficiency less than half of the required value is graded Dangerous. On a roller brake tester, if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock, the efficiency requirement for that system counts as met.

Brake imbalance across an axle (roller test, efficiency check, rear)

Failed on 41 first tests4.9 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A wheel giving less than a set share of the maximum effort from the other wheel on the same axle is Major. On a steered axle, less than half is graded Dangerous. Testers disregard an imbalance if the lower effort is the result of a locked wheel, or if the higher effort from a wheel is at or below a low set figure.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Steering

One fault: track rod end, 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Track rod end

Failed on 27 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play is Major, and one worn to the extent there is a serious risk of detachment is graded Dangerous. A dust cover that is damaged but still keeps dirt out is Minor, and one missing or no longer keeping dirt out is Major. Testers must tell wear from a joint's built-in clearance or spring loading.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the horn: 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Horn

Failed on 22 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A horn that does not work, or is likely to be confused with an emergency vehicle siren, is graded Major. Gongs, bells, sirens and anything with more than one tone, which includes a horn that alternates between its notes, are not allowed, except a gong, bell or siren on vehicles first used before a set date. Sound defects are Minor for named cases such as a bell or harsh sound, and Major under a general row.

Rear fog light

Failed on 25 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing obligatory rear fog lamp, one that is not working, or one that does not emit a steady red light is graded Major. A rear fog lamp adversely affected by the operation of any other lamp is Major too. The manual allows it to go out when main beam is switched on or when dipped beam headlamps are switched off.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Seat belt condition (front)

Noted on 27 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Wheel bearings (rear)

Noted on 22 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm ball joint (front)

Noted on 55 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Transmission oil leaks

Noted on 22 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Exhaust system

Noted on 57 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
54in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
8in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
38in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 54.0% of 1,374 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 61.7%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 38 not fixed make the 46 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002006201020152020Older carsNewer cars
406080100200620102020Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200457 in every 100577
200553 in every 100899
2006 This car54 in every 1001,374
200755 in every 1001,638
200855 in every 1001,317
200953 in every 1001,387
201055 in every 1001,546
201155 in every 1003,290
201252 in every 1002,874
201357 in every 1003,072
201458 in every 1003,171
201560 in every 1003,600
201670 in every 1007,275
201768 in every 1008,322
201870 in every 1007,400
201974 in every 1006,878
202078 in every 1003,960
202182 in every 1006,561

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2006 Nissan Navara follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Chassis condition (rear), about 18 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 54.0% of 1,374 first MOTs on the 2006 Nissan Navara passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 61.7%. Among 632 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Chassis condition (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (18.1% of those tests; 114 observed failures; about 12× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2006 Nissan Navara at the first attempt were Chassis condition (rear) (18.1%), Suspension mounting area (rear) (14.7%) and Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (14.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Chassis condition (rear) (18.1% of those tests; 114 observed failures; about 12× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Chassis condition (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (18.1% of those tests; 114 observed failures; about 12× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2006 Nissan Navara include Chassis condition (rear), Suspension spring mounting area (rear), Propeller shaft joints (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2006 Nissan Navara (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check